British Randomised Controlled Trial of Atrioventricular (AV) and Interventricular (VV) Optimisation (BRAVO)
BRAVO
1 other identifier
interventional
403
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many patients who have cardiac resynchronisation therapy (a type of pacemaker) implanted for heart failure do not have the settings of their device optimised. The most widely available method for optimisation uses flow measured using cardiac ultrasound (echocardiography) to determine the optimal settings. However, this is not frequently performed because it is time consuming and requires two skilled operators. In this study the investigators will test a new non-invasive method for optimisation, which utilises pressure measurements (non-invasive blood pressure measured from the finger). Is optimising AV and VV delay using non-invasive haemodynamics at least equivalent, in terms of exercise capacity, to conventional echo optimisation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Dec 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 13, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedJune 30, 2015
May 1, 2014
4.1 years
December 10, 2010
June 29, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Is optimising AV and VV delay using non-invasive haemodynamics at least equivalent, in terms of exercise capacity, to conventional echo optimisation
6 months following the last follow-up of the last patient
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To determine whether pressure optimisation is at least equivalent to echo optimisation of flow: in terms resulting size of the heart in terms of quality of life scores in terms of blood marker of heart failure severity
6 months following the last follow-up of the last patient
Study Arms (2)
Non-invasive haemodynamic optimisation
EXPERIMENTALOptimization of pressure production by the heart, as measured by systolic blood pressure in the systemic circulation
ECHO optimisation
ACTIVE COMPARATOROptimization of AV/VV delay using the guideline recommendations
Interventions
Comparing the method of non-invasive haemodynamic
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Chronic heart failure due to systolic dysfunction
- Biventricular pacemaker implanted
- Give written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Lung disease or any condition that would preclude them from walking on a treadmill
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Imperial College Londonlead
- University of Aberdeencollaborator
Study Sites (1)
ICCH, Imperial College London
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Whinnett ZI, Sohaib SMA, Mason M, Duncan E, Tanner M, Lefroy D, Al-Obaidi M, Ellery S, Leyva-Leon F, Betts T, Dayer M, Foley P, Swinburn J, Thomas M, Khiani R, Wong T, Yousef Z, Rogers D, Kalra PR, Dhileepan V, March K, Howard J, Kyriacou A, Mayet J, Kanagaratnam P, Frenneaux M, Hughes AD, Francis DP. Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Hemodynamic Optimization Against Echocardiographic Optimization of AV and VV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The BRAVO Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug;12(8 Pt 1):1407-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 May 16.
PMID: 29778861DERIVEDJones S, Lumens J, Sohaib SMA, Finegold JA, Kanagaratnam P, Tanner M, Duncan E, Moore P, Leyva F, Frenneaux M, Mason M, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Whinnett ZI; BRAVO Investigators. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: mechanisms of action and scope for further improvement in cardiac function. Europace. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):1178-1186. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw136.
PMID: 27411361DERIVEDWhinnett ZI, Sohaib SM, Jones S, Kyriacou A, March K, Coady E, Mayet J, Hughes AD, Frenneaux M, Francis DP; BRAVO Investigators. British randomised controlled trial of AV and VV optimization ("BRAVO") study: rationale, design, and endpoints. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Apr 3;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-42.
PMID: 24693953DERIVEDJones S, Shun-Shin MJ, Cole GD, Sau A, March K, Williams S, Kyriacou A, Hughes AD, Mayet J, Frenneaux M, Manisty CH, Whinnett ZI, Francis DP. Applicability of the iterative technique for cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization: full-disclosure, 50-sequential-patient dataset of transmitral Doppler traces, with implications for future research design and guidelines. Europace. 2014 Apr;16(4):541-50. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut257. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
PMID: 24068445DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr Darrel Francis
Imperial College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2010
First Posted
December 13, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2014-05