Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids
CAMEO
1 other identifier
interventional
261
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The CAre Management for the Effective use of Opioids (CAMEO) trial is a 2-arm randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of pharmacological vs. behavioral approaches for chronic lower back pain. The study aims are to compare the interventions' (PHARM vs. BEH) effects on pain intensity, pain interference, function, and other pain relevant outcomes over 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Dec 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 11, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 8, 2018
CompletedJuly 27, 2023
July 1, 2023
4 years
November 5, 2010
March 8, 2017
July 19, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Brief Pain Inventory Total Score at Baseline and Change Score From Baseline at 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
The Brief Pain Inventory Total Score combines scores from the BPI Pain Intensity subscale and the BPI Pain Interference subscale. This scale provides a total score from 0 (no pain/no pain interference) to 10 (worst pain imaginable/completely interferes). We report below the baseline score on the 0 to 10 scale. At each follow-up time point (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) we report the change from baseline to follow-up. This value was calculated as the baseline score minus the follow-up score.
Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Score at Baseline and Each Follow-up Time Point
The Brief Pain Inventory pain intensity score is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). We report below the baseline score on the 0 to 10 scale. At each follow-up time point (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) we report the change from baseline to follow-up. This value was calculated as the baseline score minus the follow-up score.
Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Scale Score
The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Scale score assesses if pain interferes with 7 common activities. This scale is score 0 (no interference) to 10 (high interference). The 7-items are averaged to give a score.
Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Roland Morris Disability Scale
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
AUDIT-C
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1: Pharmacological (MED)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in the Pharmacological (MED) arm will receive at least 8 contacts with the nurse care managers (NCM) over the trial period. Participants will have an initial visit at baseline to assess their current and past treatments for chronic lower back pain, pain intensity, and pain-related limitations. Patients' opioids will be adjusted and/or co-analgesics (or adjuvants) will be initiated. During follow-up calls, patients' pain severity, response to treatment, adherence, adverse effects, and desire to change current treatment will be assessed. Follow-up NCM telephone contacts will occur at 2 and 4 weeks after baseline, and months 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9 months. On average, these calls last between 10 to 20 minutes. Detailed logs will be kept of the timing and content of patient contacts.
Arm 2: Behavioral treatment (CBT)
EXPERIMENTALVeterans randomized to behavioral treatment arm (CBT) will receive a series of 8 pain self-management/coping skills training sessions delivered by one of three primary-care based clinical psychologists. Since optimal application of non-pharmacological interventions for pain involves tailoring to patient needs, participants will be introduced to a menu of self-management and coping skills rather than receive a prescribed program. Delivery of the behavioral intervention will employ a flexible approach that is easily adapted to individual preferences and perceived need for learning specific pain coping skills. Tailoring will include the selection of relevant content and skills and assessment of readiness to change behaviors.
Interventions
During the baseline assessment, the nurse care managers will determine current and past treatments for chronic lower back pain and establish whether or not patients have had an adequate trial (i.e., were analgesics sufficiently dosed). If not, the nurse care manager in conjunction with study doctors will recommend an adjustment of the patients' opioid or initiate treatment with a co-analgesic with appropriate dosing and scheduling. The Patients in the MED arm will be asked to sign an opioid treatment agreement at enrollment.
There will be 8 sessions of pain self-management and coping skills.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Veterans will be eligible if they have:
- chronic lower back pain of at least moderate intensity
- pain for 6 months
- on chronic opioid therapy
- and access to a working telephone
You may not qualify if:
- severe medical conditions
- active psychosis
- schizophrenia
- active suicidal ideation
- pending back surgery
- moderately severe cognitive impairment
- involvement in ongoing pain trials
- and pregnant or trying to become pregnant
- The investigators will exclude Veterans with an active substance use disorder (i.e., those currently in treatment), but to maximize generalizability the investigators will not exclude those with a past history of substance abuse.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-2884, United States
Related Publications (10)
Chen CX, Kroenke K, Stump TE, Kean J, Carpenter JS, Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Monahan PO. Estimating minimally important differences for the PROMIS pain interference scales: results from 3 randomized clinical trials. Pain. 2018 Apr;159(4):775-782. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001121.
PMID: 29200181RESULTChen CX, Kroenke K, Stump T, Kean J, Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Damush T, Monahan PO. Comparative Responsiveness of the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Forms With Legacy Pain Measures: Results From Three Randomized Clinical Trials. J Pain. 2019 Jun;20(6):664-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
PMID: 30529442RESULTBair MJ, Outcalt SD, Slaven JE, Kroenke K, Kempf C, Zillich AJ, Damush TM, Saha C, French DD, Krebs EE. Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO): A Randomized Trial. Abstracts of the 77th Annual Scientific Meeting, March 6-9, 2019. Vancouver, BC, Canada. Abstract 1734. [Abstract]. Psychosomatic medicine. 2019 May 1; 81(4):A-149.
RESULTKroenke K, Stump TE, Chen CX, Kean J, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Krebs EE, Monahan PO. Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials. J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.101. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
PMID: 32056864RESULTKroenke K, Stump TE, Chen CX, Kean J, Damush TM, Bair MJ, Krebs EE, Monahan PO. Responsiveness of PROMIS and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) Depression Scales in three clinical trials. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 4;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01674-3.
PMID: 33541362RESULTKroenke K, Stump TE, Kean J, Krebs EE, Damush TM, Bair MJ, Monahan PO. Diagnostic operating characteristics of PROMIS scales in screening for depression. J Psychosom Res. 2021 Aug;147:110532. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110532. Epub 2021 May 25.
PMID: 34052655RESULTBushey MA, Slaven J, Outcalt SD, Kroenke K, Kempf C, Froman A, Sargent C, Baecher B, Zillich A, Damush TM, Saha C, French DD, Bair MJ. Design and methods of the Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO) trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106456. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106456. Epub 2021 May 25.
PMID: 34048943RESULTBushey MA, Slaven JE, Outcalt SD, Kroenke K, Kempf C, Froman A, Sargent C, Baecher B, Zillich AJ, Damush TM, Saha C, French DD, Bair MJ. Effect of Medication Optimization vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among US Veterans With Chronic Low Back Pain Receiving Long-term Opioid Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2242533. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42533.
PMID: 36394874RESULTMidboe AM, Lewis ET, Paik MC, Gallagher RM, Rosenberg JM, Goodman F, Kerns RD, Becker WC, Trafton JA. Measurement of adherence to clinical practice guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic pain. Transl Behav Med. 2012 Mar;2(1):57-64. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0104-5.
PMID: 24073098RESULTKoechlin H, Locher C, Barke A, Korwisi B. Retrospective identification of the diagnosis of chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a pragmatic suggestion by The Pain Net. Pain. 2025 Feb 1;166(2):311-314. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003380. Epub 2024 Sep 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 39172815DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Matthew J. Bair
- Organization
- VA Center for Health Information and Communication
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew J. Bair, MD MS
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2010
First Posted
November 8, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 11, 2015
Study Completion
December 31, 2015
Last Updated
July 27, 2023
Results First Posted
June 8, 2018
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Upon request, we will share data with other researchers