Central Mechanisms of Intervention for Low Back Pain
Central Mechanisms of Body Based Intervention for Musculoskeletal Low Back Pain
3 other identifiers
interventional
159
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Body-based interventions have consistently shown clinical effectiveness in patients with back pain. The primary objective for this study is to compare the effect of body-based interventions commonly used in the management of low back pain on behavioral and cortical measures of pain sensitivity and central sensitization of pain. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the interventions or be in a control group. The central hypothesis for this proposal is that spinal manipulation, a specific form of body-based intervention, inhibits central sensitization of pain normalizing pain sensitivity more rapidly than other interventions. The completion of the proposed study will elucidate underpinning mechanisms of body-based interventions. Identification of these mechanisms will improve the clinical application and utilization of these interventions in the management of musculoskeletal pain conditions, especially back pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Aug 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 26, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedApril 5, 2018
April 1, 2018
4.8 years
July 26, 2011
April 4, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Immediate change in temporal sensory summation
We will use both behavioral (ratings) and cortical (using fMRI) measures of temporal sensory summation.
10 minutes post-intervention
Change in temporal sensory summation
The change temporal sensory summation (determined using quantitative sensory testing and fMRI) will be calculated from pre-intervention to 48 hours post-intervention
48 hours post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Physical Impairment Index
48 hours post-intervention
Study Arms (3)
Spinal Manipulation
EXPERIMENTALHigh-velocity manual technique applied to the pelvis with the participant in supine
Static Touch
SHAM COMPARATORPractitioner hands are placed on the lumbar spine with the participant in prone.
Spinal Mobilization
ACTIVE COMPARATOROscillation of the third lumbar level performed with the participant in prone
Interventions
High velocity low amplitude joint-biased intervention
Low velocity, large amplitude oscillating joint biased technique
The investigators maintains hand contact with both hands over the lumbar area of the participant
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 18 to 40 years
- able to read and understand spoken English
You may not qualify if:
- Previous participation in a conditioning program specific to trunk extensors in the past 6 months
- Any report of back or leg pain in the past 3 months
- Any chronic medical conditions that may affect pain perception (e.g., diabetes, high blood pressure, fibromyalgia, headaches), kidney dysfunction, muscle damage, or major psychiatric disorder
- History of previous injury including surgery to the lumbar spine, renal malfunction, cardiac condition, high blood pressure, osteoporosis, or liver dysfunction
- Consumption of any drugs (e.g., caffeine, alcohol, theophyline, tranquilizers, antidepressants) that may affect pain perception or hydration status from 24 hr. before participation until completion of the investigation
- Performance of any intervention for symptoms induced by exercise and before the termination of their participation or the protocol
- Recent illness
- Any contraindication to MRI e.g.: pacemakers, metal implants which are not MRI compatible (e.g. aneurysm clip), pregnancy and severe claustrophobia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0154, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark D Bishop, PT, PhD
University of Florida
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2011
First Posted
August 1, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04