NCT01233700

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential effectiveness of a psychosocial intervention based on the principles of motivational interviewing. The novel intervention will assist living donor candidates to think through any remaining concerns or questions that they may have about living donation. If the intervention is effective, it may help to prevent post-donation problems related to psychological and health outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
113

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2010

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2010

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 26, 2010

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 3, 2010

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

March 2, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

October 26, 2010

Last Update Submit

February 10, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

living donationorgan donationpsychological adaptationmental healthphysical well-beinginterpersonal relationsquality of lifepsychosocial factors

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • psychological distress

    PRIME-MD depression and anxiety modules, Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) anxiety items, Simmons Feelings About Donation items; Simmons Psychosocial Concerns About Donation items

    6 weeks post-donation

  • somatic/physical health perceptions

    Concerns About Donation Effects items, Simmons Post-donation Medical Concerns, Brief Pain Inventory short form, FACIT-fatigue scale, Post-surgery Body Image Questionnaire, Post-donation Symptom Checklist, Simmons Concerns About Future Health items, Simmons Perceived Stressfulness of Donation items

    6 weeks post-donation

  • interpersonal relationship quality and distress

    Simmons Family Relationship items, Short Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Family ICPS conflict and intimacy subscales

    6 weeks post-donation

  • quality of life

    RAND-12

    6 weeks post-donation

  • psychological distress

    PRIME-MD depression and anxiety modules, BSI anxiety items, Simmons Feelings About Donation items; Simmons Psychosocial Concerns About Donation items

    3 months post-donation

  • somatic/physical health perceptions

    Concerns About Donation Effects items, Simmons Post-donation Medical Concerns, Brief Pain Inventory short form, FACIT-fatigue scale, Post-surgery Body Image Questionnaire, Post-donation Symptom Checklist, Simmons Concerns About Future Health items, Simmons Perceived Stressfulness of Donation items

    3 months post-donation

  • interpersonal relationship quality and distress

    Simmons Family Relationship items, Short Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Family ICPS conflict and intimacy subscales

    3 months post-donation

  • quality of life

    RAND-12

    3 months post-donation

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Satisfaction with intervention

    pre-donation (on average, 1 week post-intervention but before donation has occurred)

  • Quality of decision to donate

    pre-donation (on average, 1 week post-intervention but before donation has occurred)

Study Arms (3)

Motivational Interviewing

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will receive two, individual telephone sessions with an interventionist, each lasting approximately 30-45 minutes. The sessions will focus on assisting subjects to delineate their reasons for or against proceeding with living organ donation and assisting subjects to resolve any lingering concerns about their decisions regarding donation.

Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing

Enhanced Standard Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects will receive two individual telephone sessions with an interventionist, each lasting approximately 30-45 minutes. The sessions will focus on providing educational information to subjects regarding healthy lifestyle issues (healthy eating, diet, exercise, quitting smoking).

Behavioral: Healthy Lifestyles Education

Standard Care

NO INTERVENTION

Subjects will receive the standard care and education provided by the Living Donor Program at their medical center.

Interventions

Standard motivational interviewing techniques will be applied to assist subjects to consider and work to resolve any remaining concerns, doubts, or ambivalence about their decision about donating an organ to someone else.

Motivational Interviewing

Educational information will be presented to subjects in didactic form on lifestyles issues of relevance to living donors.

Enhanced Standard Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Score of 1 or greater on the Simmons Ambivalence Scale;
  • Must be able to speak English;
  • Have been evaluated as a potential living kidney or liver donor candidate;
  • Aged 18 or older

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Dew MA, DiMartini AF, DeVito Dabbs AJ, Zuckoff A, Tan HP, McNulty ML, Switzer GE, Fox KR, Greenhouse JB, Humar A. Preventive intervention for living donor psychosocial outcomes: feasibility and efficacy in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant. 2013 Oct;13(10):2672-84. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12393. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychological Well-Being

Interventions

Motivational Interviewing

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Personal SatisfactionBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Directive CounselingCounselingMental Health ServicesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Mary Amanda Dew, Ph.D.

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2010

First Posted

November 3, 2010

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion

April 1, 2013

Study Completion

April 1, 2013

Last Updated

March 2, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Locations