Imatinib Mesylate With or Without Hydroxychloroquine in Treating Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
CHOICES: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Imatinib (IM) Versus Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and IM for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) With Residual Disease Detectable by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (Q-PCR).
5 other identifiers
interventional
66
1 country
3
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Imatinib mesylate may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Biological therapies, such as hydroxychloroquine, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. It is not yet known whether imatinib mesylate is more effective when given with or without hydroxychloroquine in treating patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying the side effects of giving imatinib mesylate with or without hydroxychloroquine and to see how well it works in treating patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 leukemia
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedNovember 30, 2011
November 1, 2011
2 years
October 21, 2010
November 29, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of treatment "successes" defined as patients who have at least 0.5 log reductions or more in their 12-month PCR level from baseline
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Proportion of treatment "successes" at 24 months
Molecular response at 12 and 24 months (complete response, major response, or no response)
Proportion of patients with progression at 12 and 24 months
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lynn McMahonlead
- Medical Research Councilcollaborator
- CRUK Trials unit Glasgowcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Liverpool, England, L7 8XP, United Kingdom
Imperial College London
London, England, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
Gartnavel General Hospital
Glasgow, Scotland, G12 0YN, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tessa Holyoake, MD
Gartnavel General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Project Manager
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2010
First Posted
October 25, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 30, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-11