NCT01221233

Brief Summary

Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging (US) is a procedure used to evaluate skeletal muscle size and function to inform clinical practice. US has been shown to be a reliable and valid tool for measuring changes in trunk muscle (i.e. abdominal and back muscle) size and activity during sub-maximal contractions in younger populations. Younger adults with low back pain as compared with healthy adults without pain demonstrate smaller back muscle size, lower back muscle activity, and greater back muscle asymmetry (differences in right side compared with left side). No trials are published evaluating muscle adaptations using US in response to clinical treatments for low back pain in the older adult population. Increased muscle size and improved muscle symmetry have been reported in younger adults with low back pain who participate in low back stabilization exercises. These exercises use voluntary contractions of the back muscles with prolonged hold times and low loads. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) is a treatment modality that increases muscle activity when voluntary activity is impaired and increases muscle size. Most studies assessing muscle size and activity in response to NMES have been conducted in the knee muscles (i.e. the quadriceps), while the impact of NMES on the back muscles remains relatively unexplored. Given the potential to evaluate back muscle size and activity with US, this assessment tool may be used to document muscle adaptations to a clinical intervention in older adults with low back pain. The purpose of this study is to conduct a 6-week clinical trial to determine if NMES plus lumbar stabilization exercises (i.e. NMES AND Stabilization Exercises) is superior to lumbar stabilization exercises (i.e. Moist Heat AND Stabilization Exercises) for improving back muscle size, activity, and side-to-side (i.e. right side versus left side) symmetry in older adults with chronic low back pain (i.e. low back pain of greater than 3 months). Muscle size, activity, and symmetry will be assessed using US before and after the treatments to determine if the treatments positively impact muscle. Secondary clinical measures of success will include improvements in physical, psychological, and social function pre- to post-treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
38

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 13, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 14, 2010

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 14, 2011

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 22, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 22, 2011

Completed
7.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 28, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

October 13, 2010

Results QC Date

October 26, 2018

Last Update Submit

October 23, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in Percent Change From Baseline in L4 Paraspinal Cross-Sectional Area Asymmetry at 6 Weeks Between Intervention Arms

    Percent change (baseline-6 weeks)/baseline X100% was calculated for each participant in each intervention arm and then these differences were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test since data did not meet parametric assumptions.

    Baseline and 6 Weeks

Study Arms (2)

NMES AND Stabilization Exercises

EXPERIMENTAL

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Lumbar Stabilization Exercises

Other: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Moist Heat AND Stabilization Exercises

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Moist Heat and Lumbar Stabilization Exercises

Other: Moist Heat

Interventions

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) to the low back muscles (i.e. spinal extensors) will be applied at the parameters previously used in the knee muscles at the maximal tolerable intensity, which results in a full, sustained isometric contraction of the back muscles. Pad placement will be just below the waist line, with 2, 2X2 inch pads, on either side of the spine. Participants will be positioned on their belly with 2 pillows under their stomach to level the spine and secured to a table using a belt that crosses the buttock. The lumbar stabilization program will include exercises targeting the back muscles in three positions: standing, prone (belly), and quadruped (hands and knees).

Also known as: Lumbar Stabilization Exercises
NMES AND Stabilization Exercises

For participants who do not receive NMES, moist heat will be applied for 15 minutes in a position of comfort for the participant. The lumbar stabilization program will include exercises targeting the back muscles in three positions: standing, prone (belly), and quadruped (hands and knees).

Also known as: Lumbar Stabilization Exercises
Moist Heat AND Stabilization Exercises

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) Physical Activity Sub-Scale score ≥9: The FABQ is a measure of an individual's beliefs regarding the impact of physical activity and work on his/her low back pain. The FABQ is comprised of two sub-scales: physical activity and work. Higher FABQ scores have been shown to predict pain and disability in individuals with chronic low back pain.
  • Aberrant Movement: Aberrant movement may be classified as any one of the following: (1) an "instability catch", defined as deviation from the plane of movement during flexion or extension; (2) "thigh climbing", which is defined as using the hands and pushing on the thighs to assist in obtaining an upright trunk position; (3) a "painful arc of motion", when flexing or returning to upright from a flexed spinal position; or (4) "reversal of the lumbopelvic rhythm", where the trunk is first extended and then the hips and pelvis extend to bring the body upright from a flexed position.
  • Posterior-to-Anterior Segmental Hypermobility: The participant will lie on his/her stomach and the examiner will apply a posterior-to-anterior (back-to-front) force over the spinous processes from S1 to T12 (just below the belt-line to the rib cage). The available mobility will be graded hypermobile (too much motion), normal, or hypomobile (too little motion).
  • Positive Prone Instability Test: The participant will lie on his/her stomach with the legs off the edge of the table and the feet resting on the floor. The examiner will apply a posterior-to-anterior pressure at each spinous process (T12-S1). Any provocation of pain will require the participant to lift their legs off the floor while the pressure is reapplied to the painful level. If the pain subsides with elevation of the legs, this is considered a positive test.

You may not qualify if:

  • score \< 24 on the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): As scores greater than or equal to 24 may identify individuals who are cognitively intact, this screening tool will exclude those older adults with questionable reliability (i.e. consistency) on the self-report questionnaires secondary to cognitive impairment.
  • Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire (mOSW) score \< 14 percent: This questionnaire will exclude those individuals with chronic low back pain who demonstrate minimal low back pain-related disability. Individuals with minimal disability may not be representative of those seeking outpatient physical therapy services for their back pain.
  • Facial Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) "worst" low back pain rating in last 24 hours of \< 3/10: Pain rating ≥ 3/10 is being used in the hopes of recruiting a group of individuals who may be representative of those likely to seek clinical services for their low back pain. Also, all FPS-Rs ("current", "best", and "worst") will be used to document the impact of treatment on self-reported pain.
  • Inability to tolerate lying on belly with legs straight: This is a requirement for our standardized position for ultrasound.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Delaware

Newark, Delaware, 19716, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

Lack of long-term follow-up; short-duration intervention may have been insufficient for muscle change

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jaclyn Megan Sions, PhD, DPT, PT
Organization
University of Delaware, Department of Physical Therapy

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, Physical Therapy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2010

First Posted

October 14, 2010

Study Start

February 14, 2011

Primary Completion

November 22, 2011

Study Completion

November 22, 2011

Last Updated

October 28, 2019

Results First Posted

October 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations