Comparison of Two Insertion Techniques of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway by Unskilled Personnel in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
134
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is one of the alternative methods for effective airway management. It is an advanced form of laryngeal mask airway(LMA) with a softer and larger cuff to improve sealing and a drain tube to permit venting of the stomach. However, the larger cuff is more difficult to save space for insertion in the mouth and is more likely to fold over. Particularly, a relatively large tongue, a floppy epiglottis, a cephalad and more anterior larynx and frequent presence of tonsillar hypertrophy may disturb PLMA insertion in pediatric patients. The manufacturer recommends inserting PLMA using digital manipulation or with an introducer, but these techniques have lower success rates compared to those of LMA insertion. McIvor blade is a tongue retractor with a thin and curved blade and a flat handle. It is used to secure the operating field by pressing tongue during tonsillectomy. The investigators hypothesized that McIvor blade would provide more space in the mouth for PLMA insertion, and therefore it could improve the PLMA insertion as well as reducing injuries to the pharyngeal wall. The investigators compared the success rate and the incidence of complications of the digital technique with those of McIvor blade-guided insertion by unskilled anesthesia residents.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2010
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedAugust 31, 2010
July 1, 2010
5 months
August 5, 2010
August 30, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the success rate of proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion
immediately after the insertion of PLMA
at the time of insertion of PLMA
Secondary Outcomes (1)
the incidence of complications following PLMA insertion
after the removal of PLMA, and 1 day after surgery
Study Arms (1)
McIvor group
EXPERIMENTALgroups in which proseal laryngeal mask airway is inserted with McIvor retractor.
Interventions
The Mclvor blade- guided technique (McIvor group) involved the following steps. The PLMA was lubricated on the posterior aspect of the deflated mask with a water-based lubricant. The McIvor blade was fully inserted beneath the tongue of the patients. The tongue was lifted gently with the McIvor blade and PLMA was introduced into a space between the McIvor blade and maxillary incisors holding the bite block of the PLMA. The PLMA was advanced into the hypopharynx until definite resistance was felt and McIvor blade was removed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy pediatric patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- pediatric patients with a known or predicted difficult airway, recent sore throat, mouth opening less than 2.5 cm, or at risk of aspiration
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Hwang J, Han S, Hwang J, Oh A, Park S, Kim J. The McIvor blade improves insertion of the LMA ProSeal in children. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;58(9):796-801. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9540-4. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
PMID: 21691935DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jin-Young Hwang, MD
Fellow
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2010
First Posted
August 31, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 31, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-07