NCT07577648

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if performance of a channelled blade Astra-Vue videolaryngoscope compared to non channelled hyperangulated C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope(Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) in airway management among adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. The main primary outcomes measured is the overall time taken to intubation, secondary measures includes the first attempt success rate, ease with intubation and associated complication Participants are of adults who planned for elective or semi emergency surgery under general anesthesia. They will be screened and recruited with informed and written consent. Intubation information will be collected

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2026

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 15, 2026

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 11, 2026

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 11, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

intubationvideolaryngoscopefirst attempt success rateease of intubationtime to intubation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Total Time to intubation

    time from insertion of laryngoscope blade through incisor teeth to visualization of Endotracheal tube into trachea, measured in seconds

    During the intubation procedure (within minutes after induction of general anaesthesia)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • First attempt success rate

    During the intubation procedure(within minutes after induction of general anaesthesia)

  • Time to Glottic Visualization

    During the intubation procedure(within minutes after induction of general anaesthesia)

  • Ease of intubation

    During the intubation procedure an immediate post-intubation period (within minutes after induction of general anaesthesia)

  • Change in Mean Arterial Pressure from baseline

    Baseline taken during induction prior to intubation, second reading repeated at 1 minute after successful intubation

  • Change in Heart rate from baseline

    Baseline measured prior to intubation, second reading repeat at 1 minute post intubation

Study Arms (2)

Channelled blade videolaryngoscope

EXPERIMENTAL

Endotracheal intubation done with channelled blade videolaryngoscope

Device: channelled blade videolaryngoscope

Non channelled hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Endotracheal intubation done with non channelled hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope

Device: Non channelled hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope

Interventions

Intubation with channelled blade videolaryngoscope

Channelled blade videolaryngoscope

Intubation done by using Non channelled hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope

Non channelled hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged 18 to 70 years old requiring endotracheal intubation for elective or semi-emergency surgery under general anaesthesia
  • ASA I, II and stable ASA III patients
  • Patient with Mallampati Score Grade 1 to 3

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with known airway abnormalities or anticipated difficult intubation,
  • Patients with desaturation before intubation,
  • Patients with high risk for aspiration requiring rapid sequence induction
  • Patient with known cervical pathology.
  • Patient refuse to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universiti Malaya Medical Centre

Petaling Jaya, Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Shin KW, Lee SP, Kim T, Choi S, Kim YJ, Park HP, Oh H. Channelled versus nonchannelled Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades in patients with a cervical collar: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Can J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;71(9):1261-1271. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02769-3. Epub 2024 May 22.

    PMID: 38777999BACKGROUND
  • Chandy J, Pillai R, Mathew A, Philip AV, George SP, Sahajanandan R. A randomized clinical trial comparing the King Vision (channeled blade) and the CMAC (D blade) videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):604-609. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_75_20. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

    PMID: 35340950BACKGROUND
  • Mendonca C, Ungureanu N, Nowicka A, Kumar P. A randomised clinical trial comparing the 'sniffing' and neutral position using channelled (KingVision(R) ) and non-channelled (C-MAC(R) ) videolaryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2018 Jul;73(7):847-855. doi: 10.1111/anae.14289. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

    PMID: 29660807BACKGROUND
  • Biro P, Schlaepfer M. Tracheal intubation with channeled vs. non-channeled videolaryngoscope blades. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018 Oct;25(2):97-101. doi: 10.21454/rjaic.7518.252.sch.

    PMID: 30393765BACKGROUND
  • Hirabayashi Y, Hoshijima H, Kuratani N. [Channeled videolaryngoscope: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials]. Masui. 2013 Jul;62(7):886-93. Japanese.

    PMID: 23905420BACKGROUND
  • Decamps P, Grillot N, Le Thuaut A, Brule N, Lejus-Bourdeau C, Reignier J, Lascarrou JB. Comparison of four channelled videolaryngoscopes to Macintosh laryngoscope for simulated intubation of critically ill patients: the randomized MACMAN2 trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 16;11(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00916-3.

    PMID: 34398347BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Wei Yen Yeoh

    Universiti Malaya

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anaesthesiology Medical Officer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2026

First Posted

May 11, 2026

Study Start

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion

March 31, 2026

Study Completion

May 31, 2026

Last Updated

May 11, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations