Channelled Blade Versus Non-Channelled Videolaryngoscope
Comparative Study of the Channelled Blade Astra-Vue Videolaryngoscope and the Non-Channelled CMAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope in Airway Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if performance of a channelled blade Astra-Vue videolaryngoscope compared to non channelled hyperangulated C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope(Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) in airway management among adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. The main primary outcomes measured is the overall time taken to intubation, secondary measures includes the first attempt success rate, ease with intubation and associated complication Participants are of adults who planned for elective or semi emergency surgery under general anesthesia. They will be screened and recruited with informed and written consent. Intubation information will be collected
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2026
CompletedMay 11, 2026
May 1, 2026
4 months
April 15, 2026
May 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total Time to intubation
time from insertion of laryngoscope blade through incisor teeth to visualization of Endotracheal tube into trachea, measured in seconds
During the intubation procedure (within minutes after induction of general anaesthesia)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
First attempt success rate
During the intubation procedure(within minutes after induction of general anaesthesia)
Time to Glottic Visualization
During the intubation procedure(within minutes after induction of general anaesthesia)
Ease of intubation
During the intubation procedure an immediate post-intubation period (within minutes after induction of general anaesthesia)
Change in Mean Arterial Pressure from baseline
Baseline taken during induction prior to intubation, second reading repeated at 1 minute after successful intubation
Change in Heart rate from baseline
Baseline measured prior to intubation, second reading repeat at 1 minute post intubation
Study Arms (2)
Channelled blade videolaryngoscope
EXPERIMENTALEndotracheal intubation done with channelled blade videolaryngoscope
Non channelled hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndotracheal intubation done with non channelled hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope
Interventions
Intubation with channelled blade videolaryngoscope
Intubation done by using Non channelled hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged 18 to 70 years old requiring endotracheal intubation for elective or semi-emergency surgery under general anaesthesia
- ASA I, II and stable ASA III patients
- Patient with Mallampati Score Grade 1 to 3
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known airway abnormalities or anticipated difficult intubation,
- Patients with desaturation before intubation,
- Patients with high risk for aspiration requiring rapid sequence induction
- Patient with known cervical pathology.
- Patient refuse to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universiti Malaya Medical Centre
Petaling Jaya, Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia
Related Publications (6)
Shin KW, Lee SP, Kim T, Choi S, Kim YJ, Park HP, Oh H. Channelled versus nonchannelled Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades in patients with a cervical collar: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Can J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;71(9):1261-1271. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02769-3. Epub 2024 May 22.
PMID: 38777999BACKGROUNDChandy J, Pillai R, Mathew A, Philip AV, George SP, Sahajanandan R. A randomized clinical trial comparing the King Vision (channeled blade) and the CMAC (D blade) videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):604-609. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_75_20. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
PMID: 35340950BACKGROUNDMendonca C, Ungureanu N, Nowicka A, Kumar P. A randomised clinical trial comparing the 'sniffing' and neutral position using channelled (KingVision(R) ) and non-channelled (C-MAC(R) ) videolaryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2018 Jul;73(7):847-855. doi: 10.1111/anae.14289. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
PMID: 29660807BACKGROUNDBiro P, Schlaepfer M. Tracheal intubation with channeled vs. non-channeled videolaryngoscope blades. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018 Oct;25(2):97-101. doi: 10.21454/rjaic.7518.252.sch.
PMID: 30393765BACKGROUNDHirabayashi Y, Hoshijima H, Kuratani N. [Channeled videolaryngoscope: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials]. Masui. 2013 Jul;62(7):886-93. Japanese.
PMID: 23905420BACKGROUNDDecamps P, Grillot N, Le Thuaut A, Brule N, Lejus-Bourdeau C, Reignier J, Lascarrou JB. Comparison of four channelled videolaryngoscopes to Macintosh laryngoscope for simulated intubation of critically ill patients: the randomized MACMAN2 trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 16;11(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00916-3.
PMID: 34398347BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wei Yen Yeoh
Universiti Malaya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anaesthesiology Medical Officer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2026
First Posted
May 11, 2026
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion
March 31, 2026
Study Completion
May 31, 2026
Last Updated
May 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share