Ultrasound Guided Versus Palpation Guided Cricothyrotomy With Poorly Defined Anatomical Landmarks
A Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Digital Palpation Guided Cricothyrotomy in Subjects With Poorly Defined Anatomical Landmarks
1 other identifier
interventional
47
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Inability to provide oxygen to the patient remains the most fearful anesthesia-related mishap. Cricothyrotomy (CT) is an infrequently performed but life saving procedure for an anesthesiologist, who is encountered with this situation. The current method of cricothyrotomy relies on digital palpation (DP). Several patient populations, including morbidly obese, short neck, radiation to and previous neck surgeries, have difficult landmarks for this procedure. Ultrasound (US) technology has been used in the past to visualize landmarks for cricothyrotomy, but there is no study which has examined the role of ultrasound in patients who have obscure landmarks. There is no data related to the performance of ultrasound guided cricothyrotomy in these patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the outcomes of CT performed on human cadavers using US-guidance, compared to conventional DP, of anatomical landmarks. In particularly, complication rates, failure to cannulate, correct placement of the device and insertion time of CT were assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 25, 2015
CompletedJune 25, 2015
June 1, 2015
5 months
November 3, 2011
June 24, 2015
June 24, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Primary Outcome Measure Was the Complication Rate Asssed as the Number of Participants Causing Injuries
The primary outcome measure was the complication rate as assessed by the severity of injuries; defined as the incidence and severity of posterior laryngeal and tracheal wall injuries, as graded by two anesthesiologists using the grading system described by Murphy et al,( none (no injury); mild (\< 5 mm laceration); moderate (\> 5mm laceration or partial puncture); severe (\> 10 mm laceration or full puncture)).
On avergae less than 300 seconds
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Insertion Time
less than 5 minutes from starting of procedure
Number of Attempts
not more than 300 seconds
Correct Landmarking
less than 300 seconds
Study Arms (2)
Cricothyrotomy using Digital Palpation
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup-1 will perform Cricothyrotomy using conventional digital palpation technique
Ultrasound guided cricothyrotomy group
EXPERIMENTALGroup-2 Ultrasound guided cricothyrotomy
Interventions
Utrasound guided cricothyrotomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Residents who are novice to the application of ultrasound in difficult airway scenarios
- Cadavers with difficult and imposible landmarks identification
You may not qualify if:
- Anethesiologist with previous experience in CT, manual or ultrasound assisted
- Patients with easily identifiable landmarks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Naveed Siddiqui
- Organization
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Naveed Siddiqui, MD
Mount Sinai Hospital Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2011
First Posted
November 21, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 25, 2015
Results First Posted
June 25, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06