Study of Efficacy and Safety of Privigen in Subjects With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy
A Single-arm Study to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Safety of Privigen in the Treatment of Subjects With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)
3 other identifiers
interventional
31
5 countries
22
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of Privigen in subjects with CIDP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Nov 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
22 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 4, 2013
CompletedJune 25, 2024
June 1, 2024
1 year
August 18, 2010
January 30, 2013
June 21, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Responder Rate
Percentage of responders based on the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Scale (INCAT) score. Responders were defined as those subjects who: 1) demonstrated a "clinically meaningful improvement" between baseline and Week 25, or 2) who were discontinued from the study for any reason after the start of IgPro10 treatment but with "clinically meaningful improvement" at the last study visit. "Clinically meaningful improvement" was a decrease of at least 1 adjusted INCAT score point excluding an improvement of one point in the total score if this improvement was only due to a decrease in the upper limb score of 1 to 0.
25 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Change in Adjusted INCAT Score
Up to 34 weeks
Change in Maximum Grip Strength
Up to 34 weeks
Change in Medical Research Council Sum Scale (MRC)
Up to 34 weeks
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Level
At baseline and at Weeks 7, 13 and 19 (levels determined immediately before and after IVIG infusion), and at completion visit (Week 25)
Frequency of Adverse Events (AEs)
For the duration of the study, up to 34 weeks
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
IgPro10
EXPERIMENTAL10% liquid formulation of human immunoglobulin (IgPro10). IgPro10 will be administered by IV infusion as one induction dose of 2 g/kg body weight (bw), followed by seven 3-weekly maintenance doses of 1 g/kg bw.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- IVIG-untreated subjects:
- Either subjects with newly diagnosed CIDP (developing over at least 2 months) or subjects with an IVIG treatment interruption for at least 1 year with a progressive disease (deteriorating in the last 2 months) prior to enrolment.
- Actual diagnosis (including electrophysiology) of CIDP with progressive or relapsing dysfunction from motor and sensory or symmetric motor nerve only in at least 1 limb resulting from neuropathy. Criteria for definite or probable CIDP according to EFNS/PNS guideline.
- Age ≥18 years.
- Male or female.
- Written informed consent for study participation obtained before undergoing any study specific procedures.
- IVIG-pretreated subjects:
- Being treated regularly with IVIG on a fixed cycle length of 2 to 6 weeks ± 5 days in the last 6 months, on a fixed dosage of ± 20 % in the last 6 months and deteriorating by at least 1 INCAT score point during the Washout Period of up to 10 weeks (except for an increase from 0 to 1 solely due to upper limb score).
- Historic diagnosis of CIDP with progressive or relapsing dysfunction from motor and sensory or symmetric motor nerve only in at least 1 limb resulting from neuropathy. Criteria for definite or probable CIDP according to EFNS/PNS guideline.
- Age ≥18 years.
- Male or female.
- Written informed consent for study participation obtained before undergoing any study specific procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- A motor syndrome that fulfils criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) with conduction block (i.e., upper limb motor weakness without sensory deficit and with a 50% decrease in action potential amplitude or area on proximal compared with distal stimulation in motor nerves).
- CIDP with monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (CIDP-MGUS) with anti-MGUS antibodies and patients with distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS)neuropathy.
- Any disease (mainly neurological or chronic orthopedic) that may cause symptoms or may interfere with treatment or outcome assessments with the INCAT (e.g., diphtheria, drug or toxin exposure and diabetes mellitus likely to have caused the neuropathy, IgM paraproteinemia, familial neuropathy, borreliosis with radiculopathy, post-polio-syndrome,M. Parkinson, stroke).
- Current malignancy.
- History of cardiac insufficiency (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] III/IV), cardiomyopathy, significant cardiac dysrhythmia requiring treatment, unstable or advanced ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure or severe hypertension.
- History of thrombotic episodes (deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident).
- Migraine associated with IVIG infusion in the last 3 months prior to enrolment.
- Known allergic or other severe reactions to blood products including intolerability to previous IVIG (i.e. severe headache, hypersensitivity, intravascular hemolysis).
- Subjects with serum IgA level less than 50% of the lower normal limit.
- Known hyperprolinemia.
- Any condition (including alcohol, drug or medication abuse) that is likely to interfere with evaluation of the study product or satisfactory conduct of the study.
- Plasma exchange 3 months prior to enrolment.
- Treatment with immunomodulatory agents others than steroids, methotrexate or azathioprine (e.g. interferon, TNF-α inhibitors) within 6 months before enrolment.
- Treatment with rituximab in the 12 months before enrolment.
- Abnormal laboratory parameters: creatinine \> 1.5 times the upper normal limit (UNL), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) \> 1.5 times the UNL, C-reactive protein (CRP) \> 1.5 times the UNL, hemoglobin (Hb) \< 10 g/dL.
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CSL Behringlead
Study Sites (22)
Study Site
Brussels, Belgium
Study Site
Edegem, Belgium
Study Site
Ghent, Belgium
Study Site
Leuven, Belgium
Study Site
Helsinki, Finland
Study Site
Turku, Finland
Study Site
Vaasa, Finland
Study Site
Limoges, France
Study Site
Lyon, France
Study Site
Marseille, France
Study Site
Montpellier, France
Study Site
Paris, France
Study Site
Berlin, Germany
Study Site
Feldberger Seenlandschaft, Germany
Study Site
Göttingen, Germany
Study Site
Itzehoe, Germany
Study Site
Prien am Chiemsee, Germany
Study Site
Schwedt, Germany
Study Site
Würzburg, Germany
Study Site
Krakow, Poland
Study Site
Lublin, Poland
Study Site
Wroclaw, Poland
Related Publications (2)
Leger JM, De Bleecker JL, Sommer C, Robberecht W, Saarela M, Kamienowski J, Stelmasiak Z, Mielke O, Tackenberg B, Shebl A, Bauhofer A, Zenker O, Merkies IS; PRIMA study investigators. Efficacy and safety of Privigen((R)) in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: results of a prospective, single-arm, open-label Phase III study (the PRIMA study). J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2013 Jun;18(2):130-40. doi: 10.1111/jns5.12017.
PMID: 23781960RESULTMerkies ISJ, Lawo JP, Edelman JM, De Bleecker JL, Sommer C, Robberecht W, Saarela M, Kamienowski J, Stelmasiak Z, Mielke O, Tackenberg B, Leger JM; PRIMA trial investigators. Minimum clinically important difference analysis confirms the efficacy of IgPro10 in CIDP: the PRIMA trial. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2017 Jun;22(2):149-152. doi: 10.1111/jns.12204. No abstract available.
PMID: 28594116DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trial Disclosure Manager
- Organization
- CSL Behring
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Program Director Clinical R&D
CSL Behring
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2010
First Posted
August 19, 2010
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2011
Study Completion
November 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 25, 2024
Results First Posted
April 4, 2013
Record last verified: 2024-06