Study Stopped
This study was terminated due to the decrease in percentage of participants.
An Observational Study on Long-Term Persistence of Resistant Mutations And Durability of Sustained Virological Response in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA)- Containing Regimens
A Long-term Monitoring Study to Evaluate the Persistence of Direct Antiviral (DAA) Treatment Resistant Mutations or the Durability of Sustained Virological Response (SVR) in Patients Treated With DAA Containing Regimens for Chronic Hepatitis C Infections (CHC)
2 other identifiers
observational
734
14 countries
116
Brief Summary
This observational long-term follow-up study will assess the persistence of direct acting antiviral (DAA) resistant mutations and the durability of sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C who have participated in a Roche DAA treatment protocol. Up to 5 scheduled monitoring visits for blood sampling during an observational period of up to 36 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
116 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 11, 2016
CompletedMarch 11, 2016
February 1, 2016
4.6 years
July 15, 2010
December 30, 2015
February 12, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (53)
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Results in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 3
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 International Units per milliliter \[IU/mL\]).
Month 3
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 6
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 9
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 9
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 12
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 18
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 18
HCV RNA Levels in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 3
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 3
HCV RNA Levels in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 6
HCV RNA Levels in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 9
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 9
HCV RNA Levels in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 12
HCV RNA Levels in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 18
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 18
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 3
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure (units: millimeters of Mercury \[Hg\] \[mmHg\]) were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 3
Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 9
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 9
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 18
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 18
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 3
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 3
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 9
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 9
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 18
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 18
Mean Pulse Rate in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 3
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 3
Mean Pulse Rate in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Mean Pulse Rate in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 9
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 9
Mean Pulse Rate in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Pulse Rate in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 18
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 18
Percentage of Participants Who Received Anti-HCV Medications in Resistance Monitoring Arm
Percentage of participants who received any anti-HCV medication during the monitoring period was reported.
Up to 18 months
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 6
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 12
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 24
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 24
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 36
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 36
Mean HCV RNA Levels in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 6
Mean HCV RNA Levels in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 12
Mean HCV RNA Levels in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 24
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 24
Mean HCV RNA Levels in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 36
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 36
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 24
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 24
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 36
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 36
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 24
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 24
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 36
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 36
Mean Pulse Rate in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Mean Pulse Rate in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Pulse Rate in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 24
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 24
Mean Pulse Rate in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 36
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 36
Number of Participants With Danoprevir (DNV) Resistance Status-Population Sequencing
Population sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of DNV resistance or without loss of DNV resistance. Results are reported as per donor protocol. Category 1: Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 99 participants with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing were included in this analysis. Category 2: Number of participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 33 participants with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing were included in this analysis. Category 3: Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. A total of 30 participants with no DNV resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing enrolled in NV22688 were included in this analysis.
Month 3-18
Number of Participants With DNV Resistance Status-Clonal Sequencing
Clonal sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of DNV resistance or without loss of DNV resistance. Category 1-Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 64 participants with loss of resistance in NV22688 were included in this analysis. Category 2-Number of participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 35 participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688 were included in this analysis. Category 3-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. A total of 26 participants who had no DNV resistance at the end of donor study were analyzed by clonal sequencing in NV22688. Three participants from donor studies WV21913, NP28266 and NP27946, respectively were not analyzed by clonal sequencing in NV22688 as loss of resistance mutations was demonstrated by clonal sequencing in donor study.
Month 3-18
Number of Participants With Boceprevir (BOC) or Telaprevir (TVR) Resistance Status-Population Sequencing
Population sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of BOC or TVR resistance or without loss of BOC or TVR resistance. Category 1-Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 6 participants with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing were included in this analysis. Category 2-Number of participants with no loss resistance in NV22688. One participant with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing was included in this analysis. Category 3-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. A total of 2 participants with no BOC or TVR resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing enrolled in NV22688 were included in this analysis.
Month 3-18
Number of Participants With BOC or TVR Resistance Status-Clonal Sequencing
Clonal sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of BOC or TVR resistance or without loss of BOC or TVR resistance. Category 1-Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 3 participants with loss of resistance in NV22688 were included in this analysis. Category 2-Number of participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 3 participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688 were included in this analysis. Category 3-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. A total of 2 participants who had no resistance at the end of donor study were analyzed by clonal sequencing in NV22688.
Month 3-18
Number of Participants With Setrobuvir (STV) Resistance Status-Population Sequencing
Population sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of STV resistance or without loss of STV resistance. Category 1-Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 5 participants with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing were included in this analysis. Category 2-Number of participants with no loss resistance in NV22688. A total of 3 participants with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing were included in this analysis. Category 3-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. A total of 3 participants with no STV resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing enrolled in NV22688 were included in this analysis.
Month 3-18
Number of Participants With STV Resistance Status-Clonal Sequencing
Clonal sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of STV resistance or without loss of STV resistance. Category 1-Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. One participant with loss of resistance in NV22688 was included in this analysis. Category 2-Number of participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 4 participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688 were included in this analysis. Category 3-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. One participant with loss of resistance, analyzed by clonal sequencing in NV22688. Category 4-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. Two participants with no loss of resistance, analyzed by clonal sequencing in NV22688.
Month 3-18
Number of Participants Who Had Received Mericitabine (MCB)-Based Regimen and Enrolled in NV22688
Population sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Results are reported as per donor protocol.
Month 18
Study Arms (1)
Cohort
Eligibility Criteria
Chronic hepatitis C patients having received direct acting antiviral treatment in donor protocol
You may qualify if:
- adult patients, \>/=18 years of age
- chronic hepatitis C
- participation in Roche DAA treatment protocol for CHC infection
- DAA-associated resistant mutations persisting through to last evaluation in donor protocol , or partial viral response or viral load rebound while on RO5024048 treatment, or sustained virological response \>/= 20 weeks after last dose of study medication in donor study
You may not qualify if:
- For patients participating in DAA resistance monitoring: Initiation of treatment after participation in the donor protocol for which there is evidence of cross-resistance to donor protocol DAA
- For patients participating in DAA SVR durability: Treatment with any anti-HVC therapy since establishing SVR in the donor study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (126)
Unknown Facility
La Jolla, California, 92037-1030, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, 90822, United States
Unknown Facility
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Unknown Facility
Sacramento, California, 95825, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, 92103-8465, United States
Unknown Facility
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Unknown Facility
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Unknown Facility
Englewood, Colorado, 80113, United States
Unknown Facility
Bradenton, Florida, 34209, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States
Unknown Facility
Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States
Unknown Facility
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Unknown Facility
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96814, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Unknown Facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160-7222, United States
Unknown Facility
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Unknown Facility
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131, United States
Unknown Facility
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
Unknown Facility
Hillsborough, New Jersey, 08844, United States
Unknown Facility
Newark, New Jersey, 07102, United States
Unknown Facility
Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, 10003, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Unknown Facility
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, 78212, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, 78234, United States
Unknown Facility
Newport News, Virginia, 23602, United States
Unknown Facility
Richmond, Virginia, 23249, United States
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, Washington, 98604, United States
Unknown Facility
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010, Australia
Unknown Facility
Kingswood, New South Wales, 2747, Australia
Unknown Facility
Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia
Unknown Facility
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
Unknown Facility
Greenslopes, Queensland, 4120, Australia
Unknown Facility
Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia
Unknown Facility
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102, Australia
Unknown Facility
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia
Unknown Facility
Melbourne, Victoria, 3181, Australia
Unknown Facility
Melbourne, Victoria, 3186, Australia
Unknown Facility
Vienna, 1080, Austria
Unknown Facility
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40210-341, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-003, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada
Unknown Facility
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
Unknown Facility
Edmonton, Alberta, T6L5X8, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1H2, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2C7, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2K5, Canada
Unknown Facility
Victoria, British Columbia, V8V 3P9, Canada
Unknown Facility
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 3P4, Canada
Unknown Facility
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
Unknown Facility
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1L7, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1, Canada
Unknown Facility
Clichy, 92118, France
Unknown Facility
Créteil, 94010, France
Unknown Facility
Lille, 59037, France
Unknown Facility
Marseille, 13285, France
Unknown Facility
Montpellier, 34094, France
Unknown Facility
Montpellier, 34295, France
Unknown Facility
Nice, 06202, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, 75651, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, 75679, France
Unknown Facility
Pessac, 33604, France
Unknown Facility
Rennes, 35033, France
Unknown Facility
Toulouse, 31059, France
Unknown Facility
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511, France
Unknown Facility
Berlin, 10969, Germany
Unknown Facility
Berlin, 13353, Germany
Unknown Facility
Frankfurt am Main, 60590, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, 20099, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hanover, 30625, Germany
Unknown Facility
München, 81377, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bari, Apulia, 70124, Italy
Unknown Facility
Napoli, Campania, 80131, Italy
Unknown Facility
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138, Italy
Unknown Facility
Milan, Lombardy, 20121, Italy
Unknown Facility
Milan, Lombardy, 20162, Italy
Unknown Facility
Pavia, Lombardy, 27100, Italy
Unknown Facility
Turin, Piedmont, 10126, Italy
Unknown Facility
Pisa, Tuscany, 56124, Italy
Unknown Facility
Guadalajara, 44280, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Guadalajara, 44650, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Monterrey, 64710, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Grafton, 1010, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, 85-030, Poland
Unknown Facility
Chorzów, 41-500, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, 91-347, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, 91-357, Poland
Unknown Facility
Mysłowice, 41-400, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, 01-201, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, 02-507, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, 50-349, Poland
Unknown Facility
San Juan, 00927, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Bratislava, 831 01, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07010, Spain
Unknown Facility
Badalona, Barcelona, 08915, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08003, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08035, Spain
Unknown Facility
Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
Unknown Facility
A Coruña, La Coruña, 15006, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Madrid, 28029, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Madrid, 28034, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Madrid, 28222, Spain
Unknown Facility
Pontevedra, Pontevedra, 36071, Spain
Unknown Facility
Seville, Sevilla, 41014, Spain
Unknown Facility
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, 38320, Spain
Unknown Facility
Valencia, Valencia, 46014, Spain
Unknown Facility
Dorset, BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Dundee, DD1 9SY, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Manchester, M8 5RB, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
Biospecimen
Serum specimens collected from patients with partial viral response or viral load rebound of viral response to monitor for resistance mutations in viral RNA
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Investigators were notified of the early termination of study in Jan2015 due to the completion of assessment for resistance monitoring arm and were encouraged to complete scheduled visits until Apr2015 for participants enrolled in SVR durability arm.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Communications
- Organization
- Hoffmann-La Roche
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trials
Hoffmann-La Roche
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2010
First Posted
July 23, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 11, 2016
Results First Posted
March 11, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02