An Observational Study of NeoRecormon (Epoetin Beta) in Cancer Patients With Anemia (FAST)
Pharmaco-epidemiological Observational Study of the Clinical Benefit of NeoRecormon® in Cancer Patients With Anemia, According to Early Response to Treatment
1 other identifier
observational
1,060
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This observational study will evaluate the clinical benefit of NeoRecormon (epoetin beta) in daily routine practice in cancer patients with anemia. Data will be collected from patients who are receiving chemotherapy for a solid tumor or hematological malignancy. Patients will be followed for 28 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2010
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 2, 2015
CompletedOctober 2, 2015
September 1, 2015
11 months
July 21, 2010
July 23, 2015
September 1, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (20)
Percentage of Participants With Early Treatment Response: Day 28 to 42
Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of at least 1 gram/deciliter (g/dL), 4 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation.
Day 28 to 42
Percentage of Participants With Early Treatment Response: Day 21 to 42
Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hb concentration of at least 1 g/dL, 3 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation.
Day 21 to 42
Percentage of Participants With At Least 1 Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion
Participants with at least 1 RBC transfusion was assessed based on the number of participants with early response or not at Day 21 to 42. Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hb concentration of at least 1 g/dL, 3 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation.
Baseline up to Week 28
Mean Number of RBC Transfusions
Mean number of transfusion was based on the number of participants with at least 1 RBC transfusion.
Baseline up to Week 28
Mean Number of RBC Units
Mean number of units was based on the number of participants with at least 1 RBC transfusion.
Baseline up to Week 28
Time to First RBC Transfusions
Time to first RBC transfusion was assessed based on the number of participants with early response or not at Day 21 to 42. Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hb concentration of at least 1 g/dL, 3 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used.
Baseline up to Week 28
Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS): Baseline
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
Baseline
KPS: Week 4 to 6
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
Week 4 to 6
KPS: Week 12 to 16
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
Week 12 to 16
KPS: Week 24 to 28
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
Week 24 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Professional Activity: Baseline
Percentage of participants with professional activity was assessed based on the number of participants with early response or not at Day 21 to 42. Professional activity was categorized as active; disability; no occupation; retired; sick leave; student, training; and unemployment.
Baseline
Percentage of Participants With At Least 1 Sick Leave
Sick leaves was described in active participants at inclusion (professional activity: active, in sick leave or unemployed participants).
Week 4 Up to Week 28
Mean Number of Days of Sick Leave
Sick leaves was described in active participants at inclusion (professional activity: active, in sick leave or unemployed participants).
Week 4 Up to Week 28
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Baseline
Self-administered questionnaire, work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Baseline
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Week 4 to 6
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Week 4 to 6
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Week 12 to 16
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Week 12 to 16
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Week 24 to 28
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Week 24 to 28
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Change From Baseline on the Impact of Health on Regular Activities at Week 4 to 6
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 6 asked participants to indicate how much their anemia affected their ability to do their regular daily activities such as housework, childcare, exercising, shopping, studying and so on, in the past 7 days on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing daily activities).
Baseline, Week 4 to 6
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Change From Baseline on the Impact of Health on Regular Activities at Week 12 to 16
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 6 asked participants to indicate how much their anemia affected their ability to do their regular daily activities such as housework, childcare, exercising, shopping, studying and so on, in the past 7 days on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing daily activities).
Baseline, Week 12 to 16
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Change From Baseline on the Impact of Health on Regular Activities at Week 24 to 28
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 6 asked participants to indicate how much their anemia affected their ability to do their regular daily activities such as housework, childcare, exercising, shopping, studying and so on, in the past 7 days on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing daily activities).
Baseline, Week 24 to 28
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Mean Starting Dose of NeoRecormon® Injection
Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Starting Dose Between 360 and 540 IU/kg/Weeks
Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Pre-specified Dose and Frequency of Injections
Baseline, Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 48
Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous (SC) Route of Administration
Baseline, Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 48
Percentage of Participants With NeoRecormon® SC Injections at a Weekly Dose of 30000 IU
Baseline up to Week 28
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Cohort
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Anemic cancer patients receiving NeoRecormon (epoetin beta)
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients, \>/=18 years of age
- Patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for a solid tumor, a hematological malignancy or an autograft for hematological malignancy
- Life expectancy \>/=6 months according to the physician
- Patients accepting and able to complete a French written questionnaire about his/her professional and social activities at each visit
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents treatment, or red blood cell transfusion within 4 weeks before enrollment
- Participation in a clinical trial in onco-hematology
- Patients with myelodysplasia
- Patients with more than one active malignancy at the time of enrollment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Unknown Facility
Neuilly-sur-Seine, 92521, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Communications
- Organization
- Hoffmann-La Roche
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trials
Hoffmann-La Roche
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2010
First Posted
July 23, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 2, 2015
Results First Posted
October 2, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09