NCT01167179

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct an early evaluation of a nurse-led follow up intervention added to the usual medically oriented follow up care. Besides evaluating the feasibility and acceptability to patients, the effect on psychosocial adjustment and quality of life of patients is determined.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2008

Typical duration for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2008

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 19, 2010

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 22, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2012

Completed
5.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 15, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 15, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

July 19, 2010

Results QC Date

December 6, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

head and neck cancernurse-led carefollow-up careprofessional-patient relationspsychosocial adjustmentquasi-experimentalprospectivequality of life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness-Scale

    The adaptive psychosocial response of an individual to a significant life change was assessed using the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale -Self Report (PAIS-SR), a 46-item self-report measure that assesses changes in seven domains. A mean PAIS-SR T-score of 50 is the average score for each domain, meaning that patients with this score adjusted neither better nor worse than a mixed cancer reference group, whereas a score lower than 50 indicates better adjustment. The total scale range for the T score is 21-80. The PAIS-SR is well validated and has been used in previous studies of HNC patients.Here, we used the validated Dutch translation.

    baseline, 6 mo, 12mo

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of Life

    baseline, 6 mo, 12 mo

Study Arms (2)

comparison group

NO INTERVENTION

Usual care Participants in the comparison group receive the usual care which consists of a 5 year medical routine control schedule based on the national guidelines, and - if appropriate - involvement of the dietician and the speech language therapist.During years one to five the routine control appointments are planned at a minimum of every 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12 months respectively. Most patients who undergo a total laryngectomy have additional contact with an oncology nurse during their 6-8 weekly medical control visits at the outpatient clinic for approximately the first year of follow-up. All other head and neck cancer patients have no structured follow-up contact with an oncology nurse.

nurse-led consultation

EXPERIMENTAL

Interventional care Year 1 follow-up: 2-monthly medical control visit + 30 minute nursing consultation, to a minimum of 6 in year 1. No restrictions with regard to cancer stage, site or treatment modality. Intervention consist of standardised nursing consultations comprising a thorough needs assessment, supportive counseling, adequate referral to other care providers if necessary and improvement of the continuity of follow-up care. Goals: helping patients (and their partners) cope with the physical and psychosocial consequences of treatment and help them to gradually adjust to 'the life after', and into survivorship.

Behavioral: nurse-led consultation

Interventions

Content of the intervention The intervention consists of structured and standardised nursing follow up consultations comprising a thorough needs assessment, supportive counseling, adequate referral to other care providers if necessary and improvement of the continuity of follow-up care. The goals of nursing follow-up care are summarised as helping patients (and often their partners too) to cope with the physical and psychosocial consequences of treatment and help them to gradually adjust to 'the life after', and into survivorship.

Also known as: nurse-led follow-up care
nurse-led consultation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with a primary head and neck tumour
  • Absence of other cancers diagnosed
  • Treatment with curative intent, all treatment modalities
  • Treatment and 12 month follow-up planned in Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
  • Able to speak, write and understand Dutch
  • Cognitively able to give informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Actual psychiatric disease
  • Actual alcohol addiction
  • Known life expectancy of \< 6 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • de Leeuw J, Prins JB, Teerenstra S, Merkx MA, Marres HA, van Achterberg T. Nurse-led follow-up care for head and neck cancer patients: a quasi-experimental prospective trial. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Feb;21(2):537-47. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1553-1. Epub 2012 Aug 4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasms

Limitations and Caveats

A historical control group being the comparison group was the 'usual care' group that included participants who were enrolled during the study and received usual care, as described. Lack of randomization may have been a confounding factor.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jacqueline de Leeuw MSc
Organization
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center

Study Officials

  • T van Achterberg, PhD

    Radboud University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MSc

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2010

First Posted

July 22, 2010

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion

May 1, 2012

Study Completion

May 1, 2012

Last Updated

December 15, 2017

Results First Posted

December 15, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations