NCT01165281

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of R331333 (referred to as JNS024 Extended-Release (ER) or CG5503) compared with an active comparator (oxycodone Controlled Release (CR)) in Japanese and Korean patients with chronic, malignant, tumor-related cancer pain.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
343

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2010

Typical duration for phase_3 pain

Geographic Reach
2 countries

52 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2010

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 19, 2010

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2010

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2012

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 15, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 21, 2017

Status Verified

December 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 15, 2010

Results QC Date

August 9, 2013

Last Update Submit

June 22, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

PainR331333 (JNS024ER, CG5503), tapentadol (NUCYNTA)Opioid analgesicOxycodone CR (OXYCONTIN CR)Chronic malignant tumor related cancer pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline to the Last 3 Days of Study Drug Administration (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Score for Average Pain Intensity on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale

    The patients recorded their average pain intensity over the past 24 hours once daily in the evening and at the same time as much as possible (eg, 10:00 PM) throughout the study in response to the following question: "What has your average pain level been for the past 24 hours, where 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine." The score at 3 days before the completion of study drug administration was defined as the average pain intensity score averaged over the last 3 days before completion of study drug administration.

    Baseline, Last 3 Days of Study Drug Administration (4 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Percentage of Patients in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score Categories

    Baseline, Endpoint of the 4-week Treatment Period

  • Frequency of Rescue Medication Use for the Double-blind Treatment Period

    4 weeks

  • Total Daily Dose of Rescue Medication Use for the Double-blind Treatment Period

    4 weeks

  • Proportion of Patients With Various Levels of Pain Improvement (Responders)

    Baseline, Last 3 Days of Study Drug Administration (4 weeks)

  • Proportion of Patients Entering the Maintenance Period

    4 weeks

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

001

EXPERIMENTAL

R331333 (referred to as JNS024 ER or CG5503) One 25 mg to 200 mg capsule twice daily for 4 weeks.

Drug: R331333 (referred to as JNS024 ER or CG5503)

002

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Oxycodone CR One 5 mg to 40 mg capsule twice daily for 4 weeks.

Drug: Oxycodone CR

Interventions

One 5 mg to 40 mg capsule twice daily for 4 weeks.

002

One 25 mg to 200 mg capsule twice daily for 4 weeks.

001

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Documented clinical diagnosis of any type of cancer
  • Diagnosis of chronic malignant tumor-related cancer pain with an average score for pain intensity in the past 24 hours of \>=4 on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) on the day of randomization (Day -1)
  • Have not received treatment with opioid analgesics within 28 days before screening (Note: codeine phosphate \[\<=60 mg/d\] or dihydrocodeine phosphate \[\<=30 mg/d\] for antitussive use are allowed)
  • Dissatisfied with pain relief by the current treatment and for whom the investigator or designee judges that treatment with opioid analgesics is required

You may not qualify if:

  • Have complicated with uncontrolled/clinically significant arrhythmia
  • Have previous or concurrent presence of any disease which may develop increased intracranial pressure, disturbance of consciousness, lethargy, or respiratory problems such as traumatic encephalopathy with cerebral contusion, intracranial hematoma, disturbance of consciousness, brain tumor, cerebral infarction, transient ischemic attack, epilepsy or convulsive diseases
  • Have history of alcohol and/or drug abuse
  • Have any disease for which opioids are contraindicated such as serious respiratory depression of serious chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchial asthma attack, cardiac failure secondary to chronic pulmonary disease, paralytic ileus, status epileptics, tetanus, strychnine poisoning, acute alcohol poisoning, hypersensitivity to opium alkaloid, hemorrhagic colitis, or bacterial diarrhea

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (52)

Unknown Facility

Chiba, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Fukui, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Fukushima, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Fukuyama, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Fushimi, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamamatsu, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Hirosaki, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Hitachi, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Itami, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Iwakuni, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Izumo, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kamogawa, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kanuma, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kobe, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kumagaya, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kumamoto, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kure, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kyoto, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Matsumoto, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Matsusaka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Miyazaki, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Nagoya, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Natori, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Niigata, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Ogōri, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Ohta, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Okayama, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Osaka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Saga, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Saku, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sapporo, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sendai, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sunto, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Takarazuka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Takasaki, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Tokyo, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Tomakomai, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Toyama, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Toyonaka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Ube, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Yamagata, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Yamanashi, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Yokohama, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Busan, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Chungcheongbuk-Do, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Daegu, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Deajun, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Incheon, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Jinju, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Suwon, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Imanaka K, Tominaga Y, Etropolski M, van Hove I, Ohsaka M, Wanibe M, Hirose K, Matsumura T. Efficacy and safety of oral tapentadol extended release in Japanese and Korean patients with moderate to severe, chronic malignant tumor-related pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Oct;29(10):1399-409. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.831816. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

Referral and ConsultationTapentadol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Professional PracticeOrganization and AdministrationHealth Services AdministrationPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Director
Organization
Janssen Pharm KK Japan

Study Officials

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

    Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2010

First Posted

July 19, 2010

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion

August 1, 2012

Study Completion

August 1, 2012

Last Updated

July 21, 2017

Results First Posted

January 15, 2014

Record last verified: 2013-12

Locations