An Efficacy and Safety Study of Oral Osmotic Therapeutic System (OROS) Hydromorphone Hydrochloride (HCl) in Participants With Cancer Related Pain
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Controlled, Multi-center Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of OROS Hydromorphone HCl Once-daily Compared With Oxycodone HCL Controlled-release Twice Daily in Subjects With Cancer Pain
2 other identifiers
interventional
260
1 country
12
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Oral Osmotic Therapeutic System (OROS) hydromorphone hydrochloride (HCl) with controlled-release oxycodone HCl in participants with cancer-related pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 pain
Started Dec 2009
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 25, 2013
CompletedFebruary 3, 2014
December 1, 2013
1.2 years
August 5, 2010
September 13, 2013
December 31, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Worst Pain in the Past 24 Hours Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form Questionnaire Score at Day 29
The BPI is questionnaire for evaluating the degree of pain severity and the impact of pain in performing daily routines. Change in worst pain in the past 24 hours in BPI score was reported. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, wherein 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as participants could imagine.
Baseline and Day 29
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change From Baseline in Pain at Its Least, in the Past 24 Hours Assessed by BPI Short Form Questionnaire Score at Day 29
Baseline and Day 29
Change From Baseline in Average Pain, in the Past 24 Hours Assessed by BPI Short Form Questionnaire Score at Day 29
Baseline and Day 29
Change From Baseline in Pain Right Now Assessed by BPI Short Form Questionnaire Score at Day 29
Baseline and Day 29
Change From Baseline in Pain Relief, in the Past 24 Hour Recorded Assessed by BPI Short Form Questionnaire at Day 29
Baseline and Day 29
Breakthrough Pain Medication (Rescue Medication) Doses Taken
Baseline up to Day 29
Study Arms (2)
OROS Hydromorphone hydrochloride (HCl)
EXPERIMENTALOROS Hydromorphone HCl will be administered in dose of 8, 16, 24, and 32 milligram (mg), once daily for 2 to 8 days of titrationphase and 28 days of maintenance phase. Starting dose will be based on participant's previous daily opioid dose.
Oxycodone HCl Controlled release (CR)
ACTIVE COMPARATOROxycodone HCl will be administered in dose of 10, 20, 30 and 40 mg, twice daily for 2 to 8 days of titrationphase and 28 days of maintenance phase. Starting dose will be based on participant's previous daily opioids dose.
Interventions
Hydromorphone HCl will be administered in dose of 8, 16, 24, and 32 milligram (mg), once daily for 2 to 8 days of Titration phase and 28 days of Maintenance phase. Starting dose will be based on participant's previous daily opioid dose.
Oxycodone HCl will be administered in dose of 10, 20, 30 and 40 mg, twice daily for 2 to 8 days of titration phase and 28 days of maintenance phase. Starting dose will be based on participant's previous daily opioids dose.
Placebo will be administered to the participants receiving hydromorphone HCl or oxycodone HCl CR along with the study treatment to maintain necessary blinding.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants receiving strong oral or transdermal (through the skin) opioid analgesics with inadequate control of moderate to severe (very serious, life threatening) cancer pain or who presented with cancer pain and will be eligible to move to Step 3 of the WHO analgesic ladder when receiving weak opioids
- Participants who require or are expected to require between 40 mg and 184 mg of oral morphine or morphine equivalents every 24 hours for the chronic management of cancer pain
- Participants who are reasonably expected to achieve a stable dose of opioid study medication during the study
- Participants who are not expected to start a course of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted cancer therapy, hormone therapy or diphosphates therapy after enrolment into the study. If participants are receiving long-term treatment including hormone therapy, target cancer therapy and diphosphate, the treatment should be kept stable as much as possible from 2 weeks before randomization and up to the completion of the study, encompassing the titration and maintenance phases
- Female participants who are premenarchal, postmenopausal, or surgically sterile, abstinent or if sexually active, they must use a medically acceptable method of contraception and must be willing to continue to use the same method of contraception throughout the study
You may not qualify if:
- Participants with neuropathic pain or pain of unknown origin, or acute pain - Participants having pain only on movements
- Participants requiring other opioid analgesics (apart from morphine hydrochloride (HCl), in immediate release formulation, allowed as rescue medication for breakthrough pain)
- Participants with a recent history (within the previous 6 months) or current history of drug abuse or alcohol abuse
- Women of childbearing potential who were pregnant or lactating, seeking pregnancy or failing to use an adequate contraceptive method
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Unknown Facility
Beijing, China
Unknown Facility
Chengdu, China
Unknown Facility
Fuzhou, China
Unknown Facility
Guangdong, China
Unknown Facility
Guangzhou, China
Unknown Facility
Hangzhou, China
Unknown Facility
Hefei, China
Unknown Facility
Nanchang, China
Unknown Facility
Nanning, China
Unknown Facility
Shanghai, China
Unknown Facility
Tianjin, China
Unknown Facility
Wuhan, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Established Products
- Organization
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2010
First Posted
September 20, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion
February 1, 2011
Study Completion
February 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 3, 2014
Results First Posted
November 25, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-12