Study Stopped
Publication of a similar study. Not ethical to continue.
Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, open label randomized study. The purpose of this study is to compare propofol with dexmedetomidine for pediatric monitored anesthesia care for MRI, specifically identifying important patient demographics and looking at important outcomes including adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Aug 2011
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 21, 2019
CompletedMay 21, 2019
May 1, 2019
2.9 years
June 25, 2010
November 13, 2017
May 1, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Adverse Events During the Sedation and Recovery Period
Adverse events will be described by type, system involvement and level of severity.
During sedation, recovery period and overnight, up to 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Parameters (Sedation Scales, Hemodynamic Variables, Clinical Observations)
During sedation, recovery and overnight, up to 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Dexmedetomidine Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORDexmedetomidine given as 2mcg/kg bolus over 10 minutes followed by 1.5mcg/kg/hr infusion for duration of scan. The bolus may be repeated up to 2 times at any time during the sedation in the event that adequate sedation conditions (minimum Ramsay Sedation Score of 4) are not achieved. In the event that dexmedetomidine is unable to achieve motionless conditions, after a total of 3 boluses, 0.5 mg/kg IV pentobarbital may be administered at q1 minute intervals up to a maximum of 2 mg/kg, per established protocol.
Propofol Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropofol bolus at an initial dose of 1 mg/kg over 1 minute then up to two additional 1 mg/kg boluses may be administered (total 3 mg/kg) - each over a one (1) minute interval, waiting 30 seconds after completion of each bolus to reassess sedation level. Once a minimum Ramsey Sedation Score 4 is achieved, an infusion at 125 mcg/kg/min is initiated. It may be titrated to 300 mcg/kg/min. If there is movement or awakening the patient may be rebolused with no more than 2 doses of Propofol at 1 mg/kg over 1 minute, in the same dosing manner as described above, waiting 30 seconds between doses. If adequate sedation is not achieved, 0.5 mg/kg IV pentobarbital may be administered at q1 minute intervals up to a maximum of 2 mg/kg.
Interventions
An initial bolus of 2 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine will be administered over 10 minutes. This bolus can be repeated up to 2 times if sedation conditions are not achieved. Once successful sedation has been achieved, a 1.5 mcg/kg/hr infusion is initiated until the MRI is complete.
An initial bolus of 1mg/kg of propofol will be administered over 1 minute. This bolus can be repeated up to 2 times if sedation conditions are not achieved. Once successful sedation has been achieved, a propofol infusion of 125 mcg/kg/min is initiated until the MRI is complete.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is 3 - 11 years
- Patient is scheduled for MRI at Children's Hospital Boston.
- Patient meets criteria to receive either dexmedetomidine or propofol sedation
- Patient's guardian provides written consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patient does not meet established sedation criteria
- Patient has history of allergy, intolerance, or reaction to dexmedetomidine or propofol or hypersensitivity
- Patient has current, repaired, or risk for Moya-Moya disease
- Patient has had a stroke within the past six months
- Patient has uncontrolled hypertension
- Patient currently uses beta antagonist, alpha 2 agonist or calcium blocker
- Known soy, Lecithin, or egg allergy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was terminated (halted prematurely) due to publication of a similar study and it was deemed unethical to continue.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Rachel Dabek
- Organization
- Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Randy Prescilla, MD
Boston Children's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant in Perioperative Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2010
First Posted
June 29, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 21, 2019
Results First Posted
May 21, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05