The MENDS2 Study, Maximizing the Efficacy of Sedation and Reducing Neurological Dysfunction and Mortality in Septic Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
MENDS2
Altering Sedation Paradigms to Improve Brain Injury and Survival in Severe Sepsis
2 other identifiers
interventional
438
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Ventilated ICU patients frequently have sepsis and the majority have delirium, a form of brain dysfunction that is an independent predictor of increased risk of dying, length of stay, costs, and prolonged cognitive impairment in survivors. Universally prescribed sedative medications-the GABA-ergic benzodiazepines-worsen this brain organ dysfunction. The available alternative sedation regimens, the shorter acting GABA-ergic propofol, and the alpha2 agonist, dexmedetomidine, have both been shown to be superior to benzodiazepines, and yet are different with regard to their effects on innate immunity, bacterial clearance, apoptosis, cognition and delirium. The MENDS2 study will compare propofol and dexmedetomidine, and determine the best sedative medication to reduce delirium and improve survival and long-term brain function in our most vulnerable patients- the ventilated septic patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 sepsis
Started May 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_3 sepsis
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 7, 2021
CompletedJune 7, 2021
May 1, 2021
6.1 years
November 28, 2012
February 20, 2021
May 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Delirium/Coma Free Days (DCFDs)
The analysis of DCFDs will be conducted using Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population, defined as all patients who were randomized and received study drug. We chose a 14 day evaluation period for delirium, because it represents the best balance of gaining valuable clinical information, while maximizing resource utilization, given the average study drug infusion to be 7 days and maximum duration to be 14 days. Thus our follow-up period will cover 7 additional days of delirium monitoring after the study drug is stopped in the majority of our patients.
14 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Ventilator-free Days (VFDs)
28 Days
Death at 90 Days
1 through 90 days
Cognitive Function Utilizing the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status Total (TICS-T)
6 months after randomization
Study Arms (2)
Dexmedetomidine
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoute and Concentration. The study drug will be administered intravenously (IV) by continuous infusion at concentrations of 5 mcg/mL dexmedetomidine. Patients will only receive study drug while in the ICU and on mechanical ventilation, and thus will be monitored with continuous telemetry as per usual ICU practice. Dosing Range. Study drug dose will be titrated in a double-blind manner according to clinical effect to achieve a "goal" or "target" Richmond Agitation Sedation Score set by the managing clinical team. For patients in the dexmedetomidine group, dose will range from 0.15-1.5 mcg/kg/hr.
Propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoute and Concentration. The study drug will be administered intravenously (IV) by continuous infusion at concentrations of 10 mg/mL propofol. Patients will only receive study drug while in the ICU and on mechanical ventilation, and thus will be monitored with continuous telemetry as per usual ICU practice. Dosing Range. Study drug dose will be titrated in a double-blind manner according to clinical effect to achieve a "goal" or "target" Richmond Agitation Sedation Score set by the managing clinical team. For patients in the propofol group, dose will range from 5-50 mcg/kg/min.
Interventions
For patients in the dexmedetomidine group, dose will range from 0.15-1.5 mcg/kg/hr. For example, a 70 kg patient would receive 10.5 mL of study drug per hour, which would provide 0.75 mcg/kg/hr of dexmedetomidine. This dose range have been selected after literature review and discussions with critical care practitioners, investigational pharmacists, and the MENDS2 study steering committee.
For patients in the propofol group, dose will range from 5-50 mcg/kg/min. For example, a 70 kg patient would receive 10.5 mL of study drug per hour, which would provide 25 mcg/kg/min of propofol. This dose range has been selected after literature review and discussions with critical care practitioners, investigational pharmacists, and the MENDS2 study steering committee.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded (i.e., not consented) for any of the following reasons:
- Rapidly resolving organ failure, indicated by planned immediate discontinuation of MV, at time of screening for study enrollment
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Benzodiazepine dependency or history of alcohol dependency based on the medical team's decision to institute a specific treatment plan involving benzodiazepines (either as continuous infusions or intermittent intravenous boluses) for this dependency.
- Active seizures during this ICU admission being treated with intravenous benzodiazepines.
- Expected death within 24 hours of enrollment or lack of commitment to aggressive treatment by family/medical team (e.g., likely to withdraw life support measures within 24 hrs of screening)
- Attending physician refusal.
- Patient and/or surrogate refusal.
- Patient unable to consent and no surrogate available.
- hour period of eligibility was exceeded before the patient was screened.
- Prisoners.
- Medical team following patient unwilling to use the sedation regimens.
- Documented allergy to propofol or dexmedetomidine.
- Current enrollment in a study that does not allow co-enrollment or that uses delirium as a primary outcome.
- Patients who are on muscle relaxant infusions at time of screening with plans to maintain paralysis \>48 hours.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Baton Rouge General Medical Center and Our Lady of The Lakes Regional Medical Center
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70806, United States
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
Baystate Medical Center
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107, United States
Mission Hospital
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-8300, United States
Texas Health Harris Fort Worth
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030-3411, United States
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, United States
Related Publications (2)
Hughes CG, Mailloux PT, Devlin JW, Swan JT, Sanders RD, Anzueto A, Jackson JC, Hoskins AS, Pun BT, Orun OM, Raman R, Stollings JL, Kiehl AL, Duprey MS, Bui LN, O'Neal HR Jr, Snyder A, Gropper MA, Guntupalli KK, Stashenko GJ, Patel MB, Brummel NE, Girard TD, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW, Pandharipande PP; MENDS2 Study Investigators. Dexmedetomidine or Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1424-1436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024922. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
PMID: 33528922DERIVEDChandrasekhar R, Hughes CG, Pun BT, Orun OM, Ely EW, Pandharipande PP. Statistical analysis plan for the Maximizing the Efficacy of Sedation and Reducing Neurological Dysfunction and Mortality in Septic Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure trial. Crit Care Resusc. 2020 Mar;22(1):63-71. doi: 10.51893/2020.1.oa7.
PMID: 32102644DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Sample size readjusted to 420 with approval from NIH and DSMB
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Pratik Pandharipande, Vice Chair Faculty Affairs, PI
- Organization
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pratik P. Pandharipande, MD, MSCI
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2012
First Posted
December 4, 2012
Study Start
May 15, 2013
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
June 7, 2021
Results First Posted
June 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05