Evaluation of Prucalopride in Male Subjects With Chronic Constipation.
A 12-week, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Quality of Life, Safety and Tolerability of Prucalopride in Male Subjects With Chronic Constipation
3 other identifiers
interventional
374
10 countries
73
Brief Summary
This is a multi-centre, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of prucalopride versus placebo over 12 weeks of treatment in male subjects with chronic constipation. Furthermore the safety, tolerability, effect on quality of life and effect on symptoms of prucalopride will be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Sep 2010
Typical duration for phase_3
73 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 23, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 25, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 25, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 9, 2014
CompletedJune 10, 2021
May 1, 2021
3.1 years
June 17, 2010
August 29, 2014
May 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Percentage of Subjects With an Average of ≥3 Spontaneous Complete Bowel Movements (SCBM) Per Week
Spontaneous Bowel Movements defined as a bowel movement that is not preceded within a period of 24 hours by the intake of a laxative agent or by the use of an enema.
Over 12 week treatment period
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Percentage of Subjects With an Average Weekly Frequency of at Least 3 SCBM Per Week and an Increase of ≥ 1 SCBM Per Week for ≥ 75% of the 12-week Treatment Period and ≥ 75% of the Last Third of the 12-week Treatment Period
Over 12 week treatment period
Percentage of Subjects With an Increase of at Least 1 SCBM Per Week
Over 12 week treatment period
SCBM Per Week
Over 12 week treatment period
Percent SBM With a Consistency of Normal and Hard/Very Hard
Over 12 week treatment period
Percent SCBM With No Straining and Severe/Very Severe Straining
Over 12 week treatment period
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo
Prucalopride
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1 milligram (mg) or 2 mg
Interventions
Prucalopride 2 mg tablet orally once daily for subjects greater than or equal to (≥) 18 to less than (\<) 65 years; 1 mg once daily orally for subjects ≥65 years, and in case of insufficient response, increased to 2 mg once daily orally at Week 2 or Week 4.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is a male out-patient ≥18 years of age (no upper age limit).
- Subject has a history of constipation. The subject reports an average of ≤ 2 SBM/week that result in a feeling of complete evacuation (SCBM) and one or more of the following for at least 6 months before the selection visit:
- Very hard (little balls) and/or hard stools for at least a quarter of the stools;
- Sensation of incomplete evacuation following for at least a quarter of the stools;
- Straining at defecation for at least a quarter of the time. This includes subjects who never have SBMs. The above criteria are only applicable for SBMs, i.e. BMs not preceded within a period of 24 hours by the intake of a laxative agent or by the use of an enema.
- Subject agrees to stop his current laxative treatment and is willing to use rescue medication according to the rescue rule \[Dulcolax® (bisacodyl)/enemas\]
- Subject's constipation is chronic.
- Subject is able and willing to complete the questionnaires (if a validated version in the language of the subject is available) and the e-diary.
- Subject voluntarily signs the written Informed Consent Form (ICF) in accordance with the regional laws/regulations, prior to the first trial-related activity.
- Subject is willing to adhere to all trial requirements (amongst others colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy, if required).
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects in whom constipation is thought to be drug-induced.
- Subjects using any disallowed medication
- Subjects suffering from secondary causes of chronic constipation, such as:
- Endocrine disorders, e.g. hypopituitarism, hypothyroidism, hypercalcaemia, pseudohypoparathyroidism, pheochromocytoma or glucagon-producing tumours, unless these are controlled by appropriate medical therapy. Subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus should always be excluded, also if the subjects are under appropriate medical therapy; Metabolic disorders (e.g. porphyria, uraemia, hypokalaemia or amyloid neuropathy, unless these are controlled by appropriate medical therapy); Neurological disorders (e.g. Parkinson's disease, cerebral tumours, cerebrovascular accidents, multiple sclerosis, meningocele, aganglionosis, hypoganglionosis, hyperganglionosis, autonomic neuropathy or neuropathy due to chemotherapy, spinal cord injury, Chaga's disease, major depression); Surgery. Subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus should always be excluded, irrespective of whether the constipation started prior to or after the onset of diabetes.
- Subjects with a significant history of cancer (i.e. less than a 5-year disease-free survival).
- Subjects with intestinal perforation or obstruction due to structural or functional disorder of the gut wall, obstructive ileus, severe inflammatory conditions of the intestinal tract, such as Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis and toxic megacolon/megarectum. Results of an endoscopy or radiologic bowel evaluation is required to rule out polyps, cancer, stricture or other structural or organic disease:
- For patients ≤ 50 years: a flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy after the onset of constipation symptoms and within the previous 5 years;
- For patients \> 50 years: a flexible sigmoidoscopy /double contrast barium enema or colonoscopy after the onset of constipation symptoms and within the previous 5 years.
- For subjects, regardless of age, even if results of this test are available within the previous 5 years but if the patient has alarm symptoms such as anemia, weight loss, heme positive stool, or rectal bleeding: a flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema or colonoscopy is needed after the onset of symptoms.
- If abnormalities have been detected during the sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy e.g., because of polyps, the subject can be included in the trial if the polyps were removed. If clinically indicated, a repeat colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy needs to be performed at latest within one week after the screening visit. If no barium enema with flexible sigmoidoscopy or a colonoscopic examination has been performed within the period as described above, the assessment is to be scheduled on the screening visit or within the week following screening. When it is clinically indicated that a repeat colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy is needed to confirm results of a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy performed after the screening visit, the subject should be a screen failure.
- Subjects with known serious illness: clinically significant cardiac, vascular, liver, pulmonary, or psychiatric disorders (as evaluated by the Investigator).
- Subjects with any condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would complicate or compromise the trial or the well-being of the subject or evidence of clinically relevant pathology that could interfere with the trial results or put the subject's safety at risk.
- Subjects known to have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or AIDS, hepatitis B or hepatitis C.
- Subjects with impaired renal function, i.e. serum creatinine concentration \>180 μmol/l or calculated creatinine clearance ≤30 ml/min, including subjects requiring dialysis.
- Subjects with clinically significant abnormalities of haematology, urinalysis, or blood chemistry as determined by the Investigator. If the results of the haematology, biochemistry or urinalysis tests are not within the laboratory's reference ranges, the subject can be included only on the condition that the Investigator judges that the deviations are not clinically significant. This should be clearly recorded in the electronic Case Report Form (e-CRF).
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shirelead
Study Sites (73)
Gastro-Kliniek cvba
Antwerp, 2018, Belgium
Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
Brussels, 1200, Belgium
GP / Huisartsenpraktijk De Regenboog
Deurne, 2100, Belgium
UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
CHU Sart Tilman
Liège, 4000, Belgium
Private Practice
Wetteren, 9230, Belgium
4 MHAT
Sofia, 1000, Bulgaria
CCBR Czech Republic Brno
Brno, 60200, Czechia
KKN a.s.
Karlovy Vary, 36001, Czechia
CCBR Czech Republic Pardubice
Pardubice, 530 02, Czechia
Universtiy Hospital Kralovske Vinhorady
Prague, 100 34, Czechia
MONSE s.r.o.
Prague, 118 33, Czechia
Hospital Slany
Slaný, 274 01, Czechia
Orlickoustecka nemocnice
Ústí nad Orlicí, 562 01, Czechia
Krajska Nemocnice T. Bati a.s., Interni oddeleni - klinika IPVZ; Nemocnicni Lekarna
Zlín, 762 75, Czechia
Krajska Nemocnice T. Bati a.s.
Zlín, 762 75, Czechia
CCBR DK Aalborg
Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
CCBR DK Ballerup
Ballerup Municipality, 2750, Denmark
CCBR DK Vejle
Vejle, 7100, Denmark
CHU - Hopital Nord, service gastro-enterologie et hepatologie
Amiens, 80054, France
ARK Clinical Research (Jean XXIII)
Angers, 49000, France
ARK Clinical Research (Proust)
Angers, 49000, France
ARK Clinical Research - Chanzy
Angers, 49000, France
ARK Clinical Research
Avrillé, 49000, France
Hopital Avicenne, Centre d'exploitation fonctionnelle et reducation digestive
Bobigny, 93009, France
Service de Gastroenterologie & INSERM CIC-P 803 - CHU de Dijon
Dijon, 21079, France
ARK Clinical Research
Le Plessis-Grammoire, 49124, France
Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437, France
Hopital Archet 2- service gastro-enterologie et hepatologie
Nice, 06002, France
Hôpital Pontchaillou - Service des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif
Rennes, 35000, France
Cabinet Médical
Thouars, France
ARK Clinical Research
Vendôme, 41100, France
emovis GmbH
Berlin, 10629, Germany
Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie am Johannisplatz
Leipzig, 04103, Germany
Fachartzpraxis für Innere Medizin
Wiesbaden, 65285, Germany
Meander Medisch Centrum
Amersfoort, 3818 ES, Netherlands
VU Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
PT&R / PreCare Trial & Recruitment
Beek, 6191JW, Netherlands
Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei
Ede, 6716 RP, Netherlands
Maastricht Universitair medisch Centrum
Maastricht, 6229 HX, Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, 3015 CE, Netherlands
Ikazia Ziekenhuis
Rotterdam, 3083 AN, Netherlands
Gabinet Lekarski Janusz Rudziński
Bydgoszcz, 85-681, Poland
Instytut Medycyny Wsi im. Witolda Chodźki - Zaklad Endoskopowych Badań Kliniczncyh
Lublin, 20-950, Poland
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 w Lublinie
Lublin, 20-954, Poland
Endoskopia Sp. z o.o.
Sopot, 81-756, Poland
Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska w Dziedzinie Chirurgii Ogólnej i Gastroenterologii
Torun, 87-100, Poland
Przychodnia Polskiej Fundacji Gastroenterologii Filia Nr 1 NZOZ
Warsaw, 02-653, Poland
NZOZ Vivamed
Warsaw, 03-580, Poland
CMI Dr. Lenghel Augustin
Oradea, Bihor County, 410163, Romania
Centrul Medical Valahia SRL
Ploieşti, Prahova, 100410, Romania
Spitalul Universitar de Urgenta Militar Central "Dr. Carol Davila"
Bucharest, Sector 1, 010825, Romania
SC Quantum Medical Center SRL
Bucharest, Sector 1, 011426, Romania
Endocenter Medicina Integrativa SRL
Bucharest, Sector 2, 021978, Romania
SC Mediclass Sananova SRL
Bucharest, Sector 5, 050524, Romania
SC Cabinet Medical Dr. Blaj Stefan SRL
Bucharest, Sector 5, 40101, Romania
Centrul Medical Humanitas
Bucharest, Sector 6, 062272, Romania
Centrul Medical Tuculanu SRL
Timișoara, Timiș County, 300158, Romania
Centrul Medical Sana
Bucharest, 11025, Romania
Spitalul Clinic Judetean Cluj,Clinica Medicala I
Cluj-Napoca, 400006, Romania
Gastromedica SRL
Iași, 700506, Romania
Cabinet Medical Dr. Lokos Barna-Csaba
Miercurea-Ciuc, 530174, Romania
Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Sibiu
Sibiu, 550245, Romania
CMI de Gastroenterologie Dobru Daniela
Târgu Mureş, 540130, Romania
Policlinic Algomed SRL
Timișoara, 300002, Romania
Oldfield Surgery
Bath, BA2 3HT, United Kingdom
Avondale Surgery
Chesterfield, S40 4TE, United Kingdom
University Hospital & Warwickshire -
Coventry, CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
Durham, DH1 5GA, United Kingdom
Burbage Surgery
Hinckley, LE10 2SE, United Kingdom
Townhead Research
Irvine, KA12 0AY, United Kingdom
Wythenshawe Hospital
Manchester, M23 9LT, United Kingdom
Sherbourne Medical Centre
Royal Leamington Spa, CV32 4RA, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Lembo A, Staller K, Boules M, Feuerstadt P, Spalding W, Gabriel A, Youssef A, Xie Y, Terreri B, Cash BD. Efficacy and safety of prucalopride in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation stratified by age, body mass index, and renal function: a post hoc analysis of phase III and IV, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 10;17:17562848241299731. doi: 10.1177/17562848241299731. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39664231DERIVEDStaller K, Hinson J, Kerstens R, Spalding W, Lembo A. Efficacy of Prucalopride for Chronic Idiopathic Constipation: An Analysis of Participants With Moderate to Very Severe Abdominal Bloating. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;117(1):184-188. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001521.
PMID: 34585675DERIVEDYiannakou Y, Piessevaux H, Bouchoucha M, Schiefke I, Filip R, Gabalec L, Dina I, Stephenson D, Kerstens R, Etherson K, Levine A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prucalopride in men with chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;110(5):741-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.115. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
PMID: 25869393DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Shire
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2010
First Posted
June 22, 2010
Study Start
September 23, 2010
Primary Completion
October 25, 2013
Study Completion
October 25, 2013
Last Updated
June 10, 2021
Results First Posted
September 9, 2014
Record last verified: 2021-05