NCT01141738

Brief Summary

Intervention studies for stroke caregivers (CG's) during early caregiving are few and have met with limited success. The Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guidelines (1995) recommend sensitivity to the adverse effects of caregiving on family functioning and CG health. Breakdown of the informal care system can lead to premature introduction of formal services, excess disability, and decline in well-being for stroke survivor and CG alike. Thus, it is important to attempt to prevent the chronic distress of stroke CGs through an early intervention that prevents and remediates distress, coaches problem-solving and other coping skills, can affect multiple outcomes, has durable effects, and is non-threatening and accessible. The proposed intervention will incorporate these features and will be low cost and feasible for use in clinical practice; it will target outcomes important to stroke CGs, depression, anxiety, caregiver preparedness, perceptions of life changes, family functioning, and survivor functioning. The individual format will make it possible to address life stage needs and cultural issues. Given the prevalence of distress in chronic stroke CGs, early intervention to prevent and mediate negative outcomes is essential. The proposed study will, therefore test the efficacy of an early intervention for stroke survivor caregivers that provides structured information on problem-solving and resources, guided problem-solving in the context of a supportive relationship, and training in skills to cope with stress and emotions. The intervention will be tailored based on assessment data, will begin during acute rehabilitation and will extend through the most stressful caregiving phase. The study will use a two-group design (the experimental caregiver problem-solving intervention \[CPSI\] group and a wait-list control \[WLC\]) group to examine the effectiveness of the CPSI in reducing CG depressive symptoms and anxiety, improving caregiver preparedness, perception of life changes, family functioning, and stroke survivor functional status. Qualitative methods will be used to gain insight into why the CPSI works for some CGs and not others.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
362

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2005

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2005

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2009

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 10, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 10, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

May 22, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4.7 years

First QC Date

May 10, 2010

Last Update Submit

May 19, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

strokecaregiverdepressionmediatorsproblem-solving

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES D)

    The CES D was developed to study depressive symptomatology in community settings. The CES-D measures the frequency and severity of 20 depressive symptoms experienced during the past week.

    Enrollment, post-intervention (WLC=3 months), 6 months, 12 months post discharge

  • Profile of Moods Scale short form (POMS)

    The Profile of Moods Scale short form (POMS) is a 30 item scale that uses a 5 point response set (0 = not at all, 4 = extremely) to assess 6 moods. Predictive, construct, and concurrent validity have been demonstrated. Only the Anxiety sub-scale will be evaluated.

    Enrollment, post-intervention (WLC=3 months), 6 months,12 months post discharge

  • The Preparedness for Caregiving Scale

    The Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (PCS)assesses a caregiver's perception of how well prepared they are to manage the tasks and stresses of caregiving. The PCS has been used in studies of CGs of persons with a variety of health needs. It is an 8-item, 5-response option scale (0=not at all prepared to 4=very well prepared).

    Enrollment, post-intervention (WLC=3 months), 6 months,12 months post discharge

  • Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)

    The Bakas Caregiving Outcomes scale (BCOS) measures changes in social functioning, subjective well-being, and somatic health 37. The 16-items with a 7-point response set, 1 ="Changed for the Worst" to 7 ="Changed for the Best" are summed for an overall score that reflect CG life changes. Construct validity was supported by a uni-dimensional factor analysis solution and prediction of the BCOS by stress and coping variables. Criterion validity was supported by significant correlations with a well-being measure.

    Enrollment, post-intervention (WLC=3 months), 6 months,12 months post discharge

  • The General Functioning Scale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD)

    This 12 item, 4 point subscale assesses overall health/pathology of the family. The range of scores is 1=healthy to 4=unhealthy. Concurrent validity was supported by predicting 28% of the variance in marital satisfaction. The FAD predicted 17% to 22%, respectively, of the variance in morale scores of husbands and wives. The FAD has been used in stroke studies, was sensitive to change over time and to interventions, and predicted depression.

    Enrollment, post-intervention (WLC=3 months), 6 months,12 months post discharge

  • The Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

    The FIM measures severity of disability and resultant care burden on six subscales: self care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. It uses an 18 item, 7 point scale, 1="maximum dependence" to 7 = "independent function". Two underlying constructs have been identified, a 13-item motor scale and a 5-item cognitive scale (two language and three social cognition items).

    Enrollment, post-intervention (WLC=3 months), 6 months,12 months post discharge

  • Social Problem Solving (SPSI-R)

    The Social Problem Solving (SPSI-R) short form will be used to assess problem-solving. This 25-item scale contains five subscales that measure two problem-oriented dimensions (positive, negative) and three problem-solving styles (impulsive/careless, avoidance, rational). The responses range from (0= not true to 4= extremely true).

    Enrollment, post-intervention (WLC=3 months), 6 months,12 months post discharge

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Unmet Resource Needs (URN)

    Pre-discharge; 3, 6 and 12 months post discharge

  • The Appraisal of Caregiving Scale Revised (ACS-R)

    Pre-discharge; 3, 6 and 12 months post discharge

  • The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES D) - Patient

    Pre-discharge; 3, 6 and 12 months post discharge

Study Arms (2)

Caregiver Problem-Solving Intervention (CPSI)

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental treatment will provide structured information, guided problem-solving, and training in skills for coping with stress and emotional responses (e.g., relaxation, cognitive reframing, changing negative problem orientation, problem-solving (PS) skills).

Behavioral: Caregiver Problem-Solving Intervention

Wait List Control (WLC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

WLC subjects will be offered an intervention after the 6 month assessment. Both groups will receive standard services provided by the rehabilitation team to caregivers (CGs) of stroke survivors.

Behavioral: Wait List Control

Interventions

Subjects will meet for two counseling sessions while their family member is hospitalized and will receive the treatment manual, which contains the content for the 10 sessions, work sheets, and handouts. The standardized content will be complemented by tailoring to the specific concerns and problems of CGs which are influenced by culture and developmental life stage as well as the stroke and other environmental and personal factors. Problems specific to stroke caregiving are emphasized. After the stroke survivor has been discharged, the counselor will contact the CG weekly by phone for 5 weeks and then bi-weekly for the next three sessions (a total of 10 sessions) at times convenient for the CG.

Caregiver Problem-Solving Intervention (CPSI)

Subjects in the WLC condition will receive usual patient and family education. If these subjects are noted to be distressed when assessment measures are administered or during conversation, the research assistant (RA) will inform the PI or Co-PI, who will follow-up. To aid retention, a counselor who is naïve to the CPSI will call the WLC subjects in the second and fifth months post-discharge to check contact information and ask how they are doing. Access to individual or group therapy through community resources during this study will be monitored during routine data collection. Following the T3 assessment, the WLC subjects will be offered a minimal intervention (receipt of the Adapting to Stress booklet 100 and five 30 minute telephone sessions).

Wait List Control (WLC)

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Caregiver and stroke survivor aged 21 or older. If the stroke survivor does not participate, the caregiver remains eligible.
  • Primary caregiver for and living with an adult survivor who is hospitalized for a recent stroke and who is planning to return home from acute rehabilitation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Caregivers who are diagnosed with a major psychiatric disorder and/or in individual, group or supportive therapies will be excluded from the study; however, only caregivers who obtain a score of 10 or greater on the study depression measure (CES-D) will be included.
  • Subjects also will require sufficient hearing and telephone access to be available for the phone segment of the intervention and assessment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, 60608, United States

Location

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (2017:Shirley Ryan Ability Lab)

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, 60657, United States

Location

Alexian Brothers Hospital Network

Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • King RB, Raad JH, Flaherty J, Hartke RJ. Stroke Caregiver Depression: Qualitative Comparison of Treatment Responders and Nonresponders at 1 Year. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022 Nov-Dec 01;37(6):581-588. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000852. Epub 2021 Aug 9.

  • King RB, Ainsworth CR, Ronen M, Hartke RJ. Stroke caregivers: pressing problems reported during the first months of caregiving. J Neurosci Nurs. 2010 Dec;42(6):302-11. doi: 10.1097/jnn.0b013e3181f8a575.

  • King RB, Hartke RJ, Houle TT. Patterns of relationships between background characteristics, coping, and stroke caregiver outcomes. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):308-17. doi: 10.1310/tsr1704-308.

  • King RB, Hartke RJ, Houle T, Lee J, Herring G, Alexander-Peterson BS, Raad J. A problem-solving early intervention for stroke caregivers: one year follow-up. Rehabil Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):231-43. doi: 10.1002/rnj.039. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

  • King RB, Hartke RJ, Lee J, Raad J. The stroke caregiver unmet resource needs scale: development and psychometric testing. J Neurosci Nurs. 2013 Dec;45(6):320-8. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0b013e3182a3ce40.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeDepression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Rosemarie B King, R.N., Ph.D.

    Northwestern University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcomes assessors were blind to the group assignment of participants. The study group was not entered in the data entry program.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Consenting participants were assigned randomly, using a computer-generated assignment program, to either the Caregiver Problem-Solving Intervention (CPSI) or to a Wait-List control group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Rosemarie B. King, PhD, RN Research Professor Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2010

First Posted

June 10, 2010

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion

December 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2009

Last Updated

May 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2022-06

Locations