NCT01128972

Brief Summary

An in situ model will be used to evaluate and compare enamel remineralization of bovine enamel specimens.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2010

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 24, 2010

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 25, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

January 1, 2015

Status Verified

December 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

April 30, 2010

Results QC Date

September 13, 2012

Last Update Submit

December 11, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

enamel erosiontooth remineralizationtooth erosion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Adjusted Mean Percent Net Erosion Resistance (NER) of Enamel Specimens Exposed to Test Dentifrice + Test MR Relative to: 1) Test Dentifrice+ Sterile Water Rinse 2) Reference Dentifrice+ Sterile Water Rinse 3) Placebo Dentifrice+ Sterile Water Rinse

    Enamel specimens were exposed to dietary erosive challenge and set of five indentations within each specimen was measured. Decrease in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates hardening of enamel surface. Enamel specimens were exposed to second erosion challenge to determine NER which compared the indentations values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), first erosive (E1) and second erosive challenge (E2). Percent NER was calculated by formula: \[(E1-E2)/ (E1-B)\]\*100. Smaller the negative NER, better is treatment regimen in imparting resistance to enamel.

    Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Adjusted Mean Percentage Surface Microhardness (SMH) Recovery of Enamel Specimens Exposed to Test Dentifrice + Test MR Relative to: 1)Test Dentifrice+Sterile Water Rinse 2)Reference Dentifrice+Sterile Water Rinse 3)Placebo Dentifrice+ Sterile Water Rinse

    Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period.

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Adjusted Mean Percent NER of Enamel Specimens Exposed to a Treatment Regimen of Placebo Dentifrice + Test MR Relative to: 1) Test Dentifrice +Test MR 2) Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse 3) Reference Dentifrice +Sterile Water Rinse

    Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period

  • Adjusted Mean Percentage SMH Recovery of Enamel Specimens Exposed to Test Dentifrice + Test MR Relative to Following Treatment Regimens: 1) Test Dentifrice +Test MR 2) Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water 3) Reference Dentifrice +Sterile Water

    Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period

  • Adjusted Mean Percent NER of Enamel Specimens Exposed to Test Dentifrice +Sterile Water Rinse and Reference Dentifrice +Sterile Water Rinse

    Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (5)

Test Dentifrice + Test Mouth Rinse (MR)

EXPERIMENTAL

Test fluoride dentifrice and test fluoride MR

Drug: Sodium fluoride

Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse

EXPERIMENTAL

Test fluoride dentifrice and sterile water rinse

Drug: Sodium fluorideDrug: Sterile water

Placebo Dentifrice + Test MR

EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo dentifrice and test fluoride rinse

Drug: Sodium fluoride

Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Marketed fluoride dentifrice with sterile water rinse

Drug: Sodium fluorideDrug: Sodium monoflurophosphateDrug: Sterile water

Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo dentifrice and sterile water rinse

Drug: Sterile water

Interventions

Test fluoride toothpaste and test fluoride mouth rinse

Placebo Dentifrice + Test MRReference Dentifrice + Sterile Water RinseTest Dentifrice + Sterile Water RinseTest Dentifrice + Test Mouth Rinse (MR)

United Kingdom marketed fluoride toothpaste

Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse

Sterile water rinse

Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water RinseReference Dentifrice + Sterile Water RinseTest Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • An intact maxillary dental arch suitable for the retention of the palatal appliance and an intact mandibular dental arch - subjects may have fixed bridges replacing missing teeth
  • No current active caries or periodontal disease that may compromise the study or the health of the subjects
  • A gum base stimulated whole saliva flow rate greater than or equal to 0.8 mL/minute and an unstimulated whole saliva flow rate greater than or equal to 0.2 mL/minute

You may not qualify if:

  • Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Indiana University School of Dentistry

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Maggio B, Guibert RG, Mason SC, Karwal R, Rees GD, Kelly S, Zero DT. Evaluation of mouthrinse and dentifrice regimens in an in situ erosion remineralisation model. J Dent. 2010 Nov;38 Suppl 3:S37-44. doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(11)70007-0.

    PMID: 21256403BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tooth Erosion

Interventions

Sodium Fluoride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesTooth Wear

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FluoridesHydrofluoric AcidFluorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium CompoundsCariostatic AgentsBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Results Point of Contact

Title
GSK Response Center
Organization
GlaxoSmithKline

Study Officials

  • GSK Clinical Trials

    GlaxoSmithKline

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2010

First Posted

May 24, 2010

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion

October 1, 2009

Study Completion

October 1, 2009

Last Updated

January 1, 2015

Results First Posted

April 25, 2013

Record last verified: 2014-12

Locations