NCT01657877

Brief Summary

In situ study to compare treatment effect on enamel remineralization potential, measured by surface microhardness recovery (SMHR) and Enamel Fluoride Uptake (EFU). The study will explore the efficacy of an experimental sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP) dentifrice containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate (CSP) in comparison to an experimental SMFP only dentifrice.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 2, 2012

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 6, 2012

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2013

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 24, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2014

Status Verified

September 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

August 2, 2012

Results QC Date

June 19, 2014

Last Update Submit

September 18, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage (%) Change in Surface Microhardness (SMH) Following 21 Days of Twice Daily Treatment With the 1500 Ppm Fluoride + 5% CSP Dentifrice and With the 1500 Ppm Fluoride Dentifrice.

    Percent SMH recovery (SMHR) was calculated from hardness values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after in-situ hardening (R) and after first demineralization challenge (D1) using formula: \[(D1-R)/ (D1-B)\]\*100. A greater percentage change in SMHR represents a better remineralisation and hence a better outcome.

    Baseline to 21 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage (%) Change in SMH Following 21 Days of Twice Daily Treatment With 500 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP and 0 % CSP Dentifrice, 0 Ppm Fluoride and 0% CSP, and 0 Ppm Fluoride and 5 % CSP.

    Baseline to 21 days

  • Enamel Fluoride Uptake (EFU)

    Baseline to 21 days

Study Arms (5)

CSP/SMFP Dentifrice

EXPERIMENTAL

Dentifrice containing high fluoride content as SMFP and CSP

Drug: Calcium sodium phosphosilicateDrug: Sodium monoflurophosphate

SMFP Dentifrice Prototype 1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dentifrice containing high fluoride content as SMFP and no CSP

Drug: Sodium monoflurophosphate

SMFP Dentifrice Prototype 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dentifrice containing low fluoride content as SMFP and no CSP

Drug: Sodium monoflurophosphate

CSP Dentifrice

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dentifrice containing CSP but no fluoride

Drug: Calcium sodium phosphosilicate

Placebo Dentifrice

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Dentifrice containing no CSP and no fluoride

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

CSP high percentage weight by weight

CSP DentifriceCSP/SMFP Dentifrice

500 to 1500 parts per million (ppm) of fluoride

CSP/SMFP DentifriceSMFP Dentifrice Prototype 1SMFP Dentifrice Prototype 2

No CSP and no fluoride

Placebo Dentifrice

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Wears a removable bilateral mandibular partial denture that has good stability and support, with sufficient room on each side in the posterior buccal flange area to accommodate two enamel specimens \[required dimensions 12 x 7 millimeters (mm)\].

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Indiana University School of Dentistry

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
GSK Response Center
Organization
GlaxoSmithKline

Study Officials

  • GSK Clinical Trials

    GlaxoSmithKline

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2012

First Posted

August 6, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

June 1, 2013

Study Completion

June 1, 2013

Last Updated

October 1, 2014

Results First Posted

July 24, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-09

Locations