BIBW 2992 (Afatinib) vs Gemcitabine-cisplatin in 1st Line Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
LUX-Lung 6: A Randomized, Open-label, Phase III Study of BIBW 2992 Versus Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment for Patients With Stage IIIB or IV Adenocarcinoma of the Lung Harbouring an EGFR Activating Mutation
1 other identifier
interventional
364
3 countries
36
Brief Summary
To investigate the efficacy and safety of BIBW 2992 compared to standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIB or IV adenocarcinoma of the lung harbouring an EGFR activating mutation
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_3
36 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 26, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 26, 2017
CompletedDecember 14, 2018
December 1, 2018
7.6 years
April 21, 2010
December 27, 2014
December 13, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression-free Survival
The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by central independent review according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression or death whichever occurs earlier. A pre-defined set of censoring rules were used for patients who did not have a PFS. Only data collected up until the analysis cut-off date (27 December 2013) were considered. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 168
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Objective Response (OR)
Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 374
Disease Control (DC)
Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 374
Overall Survival (OS)
From randomisation up to 374 weeks
Time to Objective Response (OR)
Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 374
Duration of Objective Response
Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 374
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm A BIBW 2992
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive a tablet of BIBW 2992 daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity
Arm B Chemotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive Gemcitabine and Cisplatin, maximum is 6 courses
Interventions
Gemcitabine d1,8, Cisplatin d1, 21 days as a course, up to 6 courses.
starting dose is 40 mg, in the event of no or minimal drug-related adverse events after one course, the dose will be increased to 50mg. in the event of certain drug related Adverse Event (AE), dose reduction will be increments of 10 mg, with the lowest dose being 20mg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pathologically confirmed diagnosis of stage IIIB or stage IV adenocarcinoma of the Lung
- EGFR(Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) mutation detected by central laboratory analysis of tumor biopsy material
- Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST)1.1
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1.
- Age\>=18 years
- life expectancy of at least three months
- Written informed consent that is consistent with International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior chemotherapy for relapsed and/or metastatic NSCLC.
- Prior treatment with EGFR targeting small molecules or antibodies.
- Radiotherapy or surgery(other than biopsy) within 4 weeks prior to randomization
- Active brain metastases
- Any other current malignancy or malignancy diagnosed within the past 5 years
- Known pre-existing interstitial lung disease
- Significant or recent acute gastrointestinal disorders with diarrhoea as a a major symptoms.
- History or presence of clinically relevant cardiovascular abnormalities
- Cardiac left ventricular function with resting ejection fraction of less than 50%.
- Any other concomitant serious illness or organ system dysfunction which in the opinion of the investigator would either compromise patient safety or interfere with the evaluation of the safety of the test drug.
- Absolute neutrophil count(ANC)\<1500/mm3
- Platelet count\<100,000/mm3
- Creatinine clearance\<60ml/min or serum creatinine\>1.5 times Upper Limit of Normal (ULN).
- Bilirubin\>1.5 times ULN
- Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) or Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT) \> 3 times ULN
- +9 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (36)
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital
Beijing, 100020, China
307 Hospital of PLA
Beijing, 100071, China
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, 100730, China
Beijing Chest Hospital
Beijing, 101149, China
First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, 130021, China
Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
Changsha, 410008, China
Hunan Province Tumor Hospital
Changsha, China
West China Hospital
Chengdu, 610041, China
Fujian Provincial Tumor Hospital
Fuzhou, 350014, China
Guangdong General Hospital
Guangzhou, 510080, China
Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease
Guangzhou, 510120, China
NanFang Hosptial
Guangzhou, 510515, China
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Haerbin, 150081, China
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, 310022, China
Hubei Cancer Hospital
Hongshan, China
Yunnan Provincial Tumor Hospital
Kunming, 650118, China
Lin Yi Tumor Hospital
Linyi, 276001, China
the 81th Hospital of PLA
Nanjing, 210002, China
Jiangsu Cancer Hospital
Nanjing, 210009, China
The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangxi Medical University
Nanning, China
The affiliated hospital of medicalcollege qingdao university
Qingdao, 266101, China
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
Shanghai, 200003, China
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai, 200030, China
Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
Shanghai, 200032, China
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital
Shanghai, 200433, China
Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, 200443, China
The First Hospital of Chinese Medical University
Shenyang, 110001, China
Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital
Shijiazhuang, China
Tangdu Hospital
Xi'an, 710038, China
Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital
Yangzhou, 225001, China
Kosin University Gospel Hospital
Busan, 602-702, South Korea
Chungbuk National University Hospital
Cheongju-si, 361711, South Korea
Yeungnam University Medical Center
Daegu, 705-717, South Korea
Konkuk University Medical Center
Seoul, 143-729, South Korea
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, 152-703, South Korea
Songklanagarind Hospital
Songkhla, 90110, Thailand
Related Publications (7)
Wu YL, Xu CR, Hu CP, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Li W, Hou M, Shi JH, Marten A, Fan J, Peil B, Zhou C. Afatinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin for first-line treatment of Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations: subgroup analysis of the LUX-Lung 6 trial. Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Nov 30;11:8575-8587. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S160358. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30584317DERIVEDWu YL, Sequist LV, Tan EH, Geater SL, Orlov S, Zhang L, Lee KH, Tsai CM, Kato T, Barrios CH, Schuler M, Hirsh V, Yamamoto N, O'Byrne K, Boyer M, Mok T, Peil B, Marten A, Chih-Hsin Yang J, Paz-Ares L, Park K. Afatinib as First-line Treatment of Older Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Subgroup Analyses of the LUX-Lung 3, LUX-Lung 6, and LUX-Lung 7 Trials. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Jul;19(4):e465-e479. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
PMID: 29653820DERIVEDYang JC, Sequist LV, Zhou C, Schuler M, Geater SL, Mok T, Hu CP, Yamamoto N, Feng J, O'Byrne K, Lu S, Hirsh V, Huang Y, Sebastian M, Okamoto I, Dickgreber N, Shah R, Marten A, Massey D, Wind S, Wu YL. Effect of dose adjustment on the safety and efficacy of afatinib for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma: post hoc analyses of the randomized LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials. Ann Oncol. 2016 Nov;27(11):2103-2110. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw322. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
PMID: 27601237DERIVEDSchuler M, Wu YL, Hirsh V, O'Byrne K, Yamamoto N, Mok T, Popat S, Sequist LV, Massey D, Zazulina V, Yang JC. First-Line Afatinib versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Common Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations and Brain Metastases. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Mar;11(3):380-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.11.014. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
PMID: 26823294DERIVEDYang JC, Sequist LV, Geater SL, Tsai CM, Mok TS, Schuler M, Yamamoto N, Yu CJ, Ou SH, Zhou C, Massey D, Zazulina V, Wu YL. Clinical activity of afatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations: a combined post-hoc analysis of LUX-Lung 2, LUX-Lung 3, and LUX-Lung 6. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jul;16(7):830-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00026-1. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
PMID: 26051236DERIVEDYang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, Sebastian M, Popat S, Yamamoto N, Zhou C, Hu CP, O'Byrne K, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Geater SL, Lee KY, Tsai CM, Gorbunova V, Hirsh V, Bennouna J, Orlov S, Mok T, Boyer M, Su WC, Lee KH, Kato T, Massey D, Shahidi M, Zazulina V, Sequist LV. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):141-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71173-8. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
PMID: 25589191DERIVEDWu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Li W, Hou M, Shi JH, Lee KY, Xu CR, Massey D, Kim M, Shi Y, Geater SL. Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):213-22. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70604-1. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
PMID: 24439929DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center
- Organization
- Boehringer Ingelheim
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Boehringer Ingelheim
Boehringer Ingelheim
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2010
First Posted
May 12, 2010
Study Start
April 19, 2010
Primary Completion
November 23, 2017
Study Completion
November 26, 2017
Last Updated
December 14, 2018
Results First Posted
January 26, 2015
Record last verified: 2018-12