Effects of Stevia on Satiety and Eating Attitudes in Healthy, Overweight and Obese Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the effects that three different types of sweeteners have on food intake, hunger and satiety levels, as well as insulin and glucose measures. The study of whether food or beverages containing Stevia influence food intake to a greater extent than food or beverages sweetened with Aspartame or Sucrose. Also, examining whether taste preference and taste sensitivity influence food intake.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable obesity
Started Jan 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2010
CompletedFebruary 12, 2016
February 1, 2016
4.2 years
April 29, 2010
February 11, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels.
Test whether preloads of tea and crackers with cream cheese sweetened with Stevia lover postprandial insulin levels compared to preloads of tea and crackers with cream cheese sweetened with Sucrose or Aspartame by measuring blood insulin and glucose levels immediately prior to the lunch preload,immediately before lunch test meal, and at thirty minutes, one hour, and two hours after the lunch test meal.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Hedonic ratings (appearance, aroma, flavor, texture and palatability)with Stevia sweetener compared to Sucrose or Aspartame
24 hours
Satiating effects by examining food consumption
24 Hours
Study Arms (3)
Aspartame
EXPERIMENTALFood or beverages containing Aspartame in comparison to Stevia or Sucrose
Sucrose
EXPERIMENTALFood or beverages containing Sucrose in comparison to Aspartame or Stevia
Stevia
EXPERIMENTALFood or beverages containing Stevia in comparison to Aspartame or Sucrose
Interventions
The morning breakfast after a 12-h fast and consumed a standard 469 kcal breakfast consisting of cereal, milk, toast with butter, and orange juice. Tea and crackers with cream cheese sweetened with stevia Whole Foods 365 Brand, aspartame equal sweetener, or sucrose participants consumed this preload 20 min before their test lunch and dinner meals. The Test lunch meal consisted of sandwiches, potato chips, and cookies, and the test dinner meal was a self-selected buffet-type meal (I.e., Macronutrient Self-Selection Paradigm) Geiselman et al,. 1998)
The morning breakfast after a 12-h fast and consumed a standard 469 kcal breakfast consisting of cereal, milk, toast with butter, and orange juice. Tea and crackers with cream cheese sweetened with stevia Whole Foods 365 Brand, aspartame equal sweetener, or sucrose participants consumed this preload 20 min before their test lunch and dinner meals. The Test lunch meal consisted of sandwiches, potato chips, and cookies, and the test dinner meal was a self-selected buffet-type meal (I.e., Macronutrient Self-Selection Paradigm) Geiselman et al,. 1998)
The morning breakfast after a 12-h fast and consumed a standard 469 kcal breakfast consisting of cereal, milk, toast with butter, and orange juice. Tea and crackers with cream cheese sweetened with stevia Whole Foods 365 Brand, aspartame equal sweetener, or sucrose participants consumed this preload 20 min before their test lunch and dinner meals. The Test lunch meal consisted of sandwiches, potato chips, and cookies, and the test dinner meal was a self-selected buffet-type meal (I.e., Macronutrient Self-Selection Paradigm) Geiselman et al,. 1998)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy and have a body mass index \> 30 kg/m2 and \< 39.9 kg/m2, or have a body mass index \> 20 kg/m2 and \< 24.9 kg/m2
- If BMI is between 30 and 39.9, waist circumference must be \> 36 for women and \> 40 for men.
- Age 18 to 45 years
- Nonsmokers
- Willing to consume meat products
- Women on monophasic oral contraceptives or who have physiologically controlled cycles
You may not qualify if:
- A history of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or other chronic illnesses
- Presence of an eating disorder including Anorexia and/or Bulimia Nervosa
- Other health problems that might interfere with your ability to participate in the study
- Taking medications, other than monophasic birth control or monophasic (same dose every day) hormone replacement therapy and allergy medication
- Taking allergy medication for a period of time less than 6 months
- Dislike of or allergy to foods/sweeteners (Sucrose, Stevia, or Aspartame) used in test meals
- Smokers
- High scores on the Dietary Restraint, Disinhibition, and Perceived Hunger scales of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire
- Use of oral contraceptives other than monophasic (same dose every day) contraceptives
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen D. Anton, PhD
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Executive Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2010
First Posted
May 4, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 12, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02