Chlorhexidine vs Lactobacillus Plantarum for Oral Care in Intubated ICU Patients
A Study Comparing a Suspension of Lactobacillus Plantarum 299 With Chlorhexidine for Oral Care in Intubated Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Critically ill patients often need ventilatory support through a plastic tube connected to a ventilator. Those patients have a altered microbiological flora in the mouth, oropharynx as well as throughout the intestine. Bacteria that can cause illness are often found in the oropharynx in such patients and measures are taken in order to reduce the risk of secondary infections by those bacteria. In all intensive care patients oral care is provided by the nursing staff aiming at a reduction of the pathogenic species. This is done by a variety measures. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is an antisepticum with a capability to reduce bacterial counts in the mouth and oropharynx and has been shown to be of value also for intubated patients. It is used frequently throughout the world. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a costly rather frequent complication to intensive care and mechanical ventilation and is usually caused by aspiration of infected secretions from the oropharynx. CHX has in some studies been shown to reduce the frequency of VAP. The probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum 299 has the ability to adhere to the mucosa throughout the gastro-intestinal tract including the mouth and in our pilot study we found that L plantarum had better ability to reduce colonisation with enteric bacteria in the oropharynx than CHX had. Figures not statistical significant so this present study is aiming to get a larger amount of data. The procedure was found to be safe Hypothesis: Lactobacillus plantarum is better than CHX for the reduction of pathogenic bacteria in the oropharynx in intubated mechanically ventilated patients and consequently has a better potential to reduce the frequency of VAP
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2018
CompletedMay 17, 2018
May 1, 2018
5.8 years
April 9, 2010
May 13, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To compare the number and frequency of cultures with pathogenic bacteria and fungi from the oropharynx and tracheal secretions and the spectra of these microbiological species
During study time in connection with the care in the ICU until invasive mechanical ventilation is terminated
Recovery of Lactobacillus plantarum 299 in tracheal secretions in the active treatment group as an indicator of aspiration
During study time in connection with the care in the ICU until invasive mechanical ventilation is terminated
Secondary Outcomes (7)
SOFA score and Influence on lung function measured as Lung Injury Severity Score
From admission to the ICU til discharge from the ICU
Difference in emerge of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
During ICU stay
Validation of micobiological findings compared to the use of antibiotics
ICU stay + 48 hours
C-reactive protein and white blood cell counts
From admission to the ICU til discharge from the ICU
Evaluation of microbiological cultures taken on clinical grounds
ICU-stay + 48 hours
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard oral care with chlorhexidine
OTHERThe control group will receive a standard oral care. This includes suction of secretions, brushing of teeth cleansing of the oral cavity with swabs soaked with a chlorhexidine solution. This procedure is performed twice a day. In between, suction whenever needed and cleansing with swabs soaked with carbonated bottled water is performed
Lactobacillus plantarum 299
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe study group will be attended in the same manor but the swabs used for cleansing are soaked with carbonated water directly from freshly opened bottles. As the final part of the procedure oral mucosal surfaces are pencilled with a suspension of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum 299 Cultures from the oropharynx and tracheal secretions are taken at inclusion (day 1) and then on days 2,3,5,7,10,14 and 21 or before extubation if this occurs on a non-culture day
Interventions
The study group will be attended in the same manor but the swabs used for cleansing are soaked with carbonated water directly from freshly opened bottles. As the final part of the procedure oral mucosal surfaces are pencilled with a suspension of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum 299 Cultures from the oropharynx and tracheal secretions are taken at inclusion (day 1) and then on days 2,3,5,7,10,14 and 21 or before extubation if this occurs on a non-culture day
A The control group will receive the standard oral care of the department (general ICU, Lund University Hospital). This includes suction of secretions, brushing of teeth cleansing of the oral cavity with swabs soaked with a chlorhexidine solution. This procedure is performed twice a day. In between, suction whenever needed and cleansing with swabs soaked with carbonated bottled water is performed Cultures from the oropharynx and tracheal secretions are taken at inclusion (day 1) and then on days 2,3,5,7,10,14 and 21 or before extubation if this occurs on a non-culture day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Critically ill patients anticipated to require mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours
You may not qualify if:
- Pneumonia as admission diagnosis,
- Fractures on the facial skeleton or the skull base;
- Known ulcers in the oral cavity, the oropharynx, or the esophagus
- Known immune difficency
- Carrier of HIV or Hepatitis
- Patient being moribund
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Region Skanelead
- County Council of Halland, Swedencollaborator
- Probi ABcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Intensive Care Unit, Halmstad Central Hospital
Halmstad, SE 301 85, Sweden
Intensive Care Unit, Kristianstad Central hospital
Kristianstad, SE 291 85, Sweden
Intensive Care Unit, Lund University Hospital
Lund, SE 221 85, Sweden
Related Publications (2)
Klarin B, Molin G, Jeppsson B, Larsson A. Use of the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 299 to reduce pathogenic bacteria in the oropharynx of intubated patients: a randomised controlled open pilot study. Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R136. doi: 10.1186/cc7109. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
PMID: 18990201RESULTKlarin B, Adolfsson A, Torstensson A, Larsson A. Can probiotics be an alternative to chlorhexidine for oral care in the mechanically ventilated patient? A multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled open trial. Crit Care. 2018 Oct 28;22(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2209-4.
PMID: 30368249DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant, MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2010
First Posted
April 19, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Results are under review and are planned for publishing in a scientific journal