NCT01097239

Brief Summary

This is a single centre pilot trial to establish the feasibility and role of endoluminal HIFU in patients with locally advanced cancer within the pelvis that is either primary or recurrent and with all available current therapy inappropriate and/or exhausted. The aim is to make a preliminary assessment of efficacy \& dosage for evaluation in a randomised controlled trial. Whilst efficacy data are limited in a small feasibility study; radiological, biochemical and histopathological analysis of the patient and patient specimens, along with quality of life questionnaires (QoL), will be used to provide preliminary measures of efficacy in this patient cohort. These analyses will allow examination of the biochemical, metabolomic and histological changes associated with HIFU treatment in cancer within the pelvis.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2009

Longer than P75 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2009

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 31, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 1, 2010

Completed
8.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

November 20, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

8.8 years

First QC Date

March 31, 2010

Last Update Submit

November 18, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

High Intensity Focused UltrasoundHIFURectal CancerSonablate 500Transrectal

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30 and/or EORTC QLQ-CR38, EORTC QLQ-CX24, EORTC QLQ-EN24 or EORTC QLQ-OV24)

    Validated Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Within the first 30, 60 and 90 days after HIFU

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain relief visual analogue scale

    Within the first 30, 60 and 90 days after HIFU

  • Tumour marker changes (CEA and CA19.9)

    Within the first 30, 60 and 90 days after HIFU

Study Arms (1)

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound

EXPERIMENTAL

Transrectal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of the PelvicTumour

Device: Sonablate 500 (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU))

Interventions

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Delivered by the Sonablate 500 Transrectal Device

Also known as: Sonablate 500, HIFU
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Biopsy proven rectal, vaginal, ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer (tumour \<15cm from anal/vaginal verge)
  • Lymph node(s) accessible by HIFU for which the primary clinical team advise intervention
  • Partially fixed/unresectable disease and locally advanced disease (T3/T4)
  • Patient considered to be unsuitable for or have exhausted all currently available therapies
  • WHO Performance Status 0-2
  • Fit for general anaesthetic and HIFU
  • Not pregnant
  • No other serious uncontrolled concomitant illness likely to interfere with treatment or assessment
  • Written informed consent for treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • WHO performance status of 3 or more
  • Uncontrolled cardiac, respiratory or other disease, or any serious medical or psychiatric disorder that would preclude anaesthetic or informed consent
  • Pelvic sepsis
  • Currently enrolled in any other treatment trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (Hammersmith Hospital)

London, England, W12 0HS, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Thuroff S, Chaussy C, Vallancien G, Wieland W, Kiel HJ, Le Duc A, Desgrandchamps F, De La Rosette JJ, Gelet A. High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. J Endourol. 2003 Oct;17(8):673-7. doi: 10.1089/089277903322518699.

    PMID: 14622488BACKGROUND
  • Hill CR, ter Haar GR. Review article: high intensity focused ultrasound--potential for cancer treatment. Br J Radiol. 1995 Dec;68(816):1296-1303. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-816-1296.

    PMID: 8777589BACKGROUND
  • Thuroff S, Chaussy C. High-intensity focused ultrasound: complications and adverse events. Mol Urol. 2000 Fall;4(3):183-7;discussion 189.

    PMID: 11062373BACKGROUND
  • Visioli AG, Rivens IH, ter Haar GR, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Moskovic E, Padhani A, Glees J. Preliminary results of a phase I dose escalation clinical trial using focused ultrasound in the treatment of localised tumours. Eur J Ultrasound. 1999 Mar;9(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/s0929-8266(99)00009-9.

    PMID: 10099162BACKGROUND
  • Wu F, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zou JZ, Wang ZL, Zhu H, Wang ZB. Pathological changes in human malignant carcinoma treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001 Aug;27(8):1099-106. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00389-1.

    PMID: 11527596BACKGROUND
  • Wu F, Wang ZB, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zhu H, Qiao TY. Preliminary experience using high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of patients with advanced stage renal malignancy. J Urol. 2003 Dec;170(6 Pt 1):2237-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000097123.34790.70.

    PMID: 14634387BACKGROUND
  • Stewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, Quade BJ, Inbar Y, Ehrenstein T, Shushan A, Hindley JT, Goldin RD, David M, Sklair M, Rabinovici J. Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.345.

    PMID: 12861137BACKGROUND
  • Blana A, Walter B, Rogenhofer S, Wieland WF. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):297-300. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.020.

    PMID: 14972475BACKGROUND
  • Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Poissonnier L, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Curiel L, Janier M, Vallancien G. Local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy: early experience of salvage therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasonography. Urology. 2004 Apr;63(4):625-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.002.

    PMID: 15072864BACKGROUND
  • Wu F, Wang ZB, Cao YD, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zou JZ, Zhu H. A randomised clinical trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for the treatment of patients with localised breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003 Dec 15;89(12):2227-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601411.

    PMID: 14676799BACKGROUND
  • Moore WE, Lopez RM, Matthews DE, Sheets PW, Etchison MR, Hurwitz AS, Chalian AA, Fry FJ, Vane DW, Grosfeld JL. Evaluation of high-intensity therapeutic ultrasound irradiation in the treatment of experimental hepatoma. J Pediatr Surg. 1989 Jan;24(1):30-3; discussion 33. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(89)80295-7.

    PMID: 2723989BACKGROUND
  • Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989 Mar;10(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9.

    PMID: 2702835BACKGROUND
  • Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF, Kessels AG, Van Boven H, De Bruine A, von Meyenfeldt MF, Baeten CG, van Engelshoven JM. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet. 2001 Feb 17;357(9255):497-504. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04040-x.

    PMID: 11229667BACKGROUND
  • Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet. 1986 Nov 1;2(8514):996-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92612-7.

    PMID: 2430152BACKGROUND
  • Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC. Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2015-24. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0704-y.

    PMID: 15657649BACKGROUND
  • Buess G, Mentges B, Manncke K, Starlinger M, Becker HD. Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 1992 Jan;163(1):63-9; discussion 69-70. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90254-o.

    PMID: 1733375BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rectal NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsVaginal NeoplasmsUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal DiseasesEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsOvarian DiseasesAdnexal DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsGenital DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesGonadal DisordersUterine NeoplasmsUterine DiseasesVaginal DiseasesUterine Cervical Diseases

Study Officials

  • Paul D Abel, ChM FRCS(Lon) FRCS(Ed)

    Imperial College London

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Leonardo Monzon, BSc MBBS MRCS(Eng)

    Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

    STUDY CHAIR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2010

First Posted

April 1, 2010

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion

September 1, 2018

Study Completion

September 1, 2018

Last Updated

November 20, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Locations