NCT01087528

Brief Summary

To evaluate the performance of PillCam COLON 2 in regards to detection of patients with polyps where colonoscopy is considered as the gold standard reference.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 15, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 16, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2010

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 8, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

March 15, 2010

Results QC Date

April 3, 2012

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Colonic Diseasesbowel diseaseslarge bowel diseases

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Accuracy of Detection in Patients With Colonic Polyps - Sensitivity

    The accuracy parameters (i.e. sensitivity) were evaluated for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 6 mm and for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 10 mm by constructing 2X2 matrix (i.e. PCCE-2 performance versus the standard colonoscopy), where sensitivity and specificity, are presented with 95% Cl based on the binomial distribution. Standard colonoscopy is considered the gold standard.

    within 7 days

  • Accuracy of Detection in Patients With Colonic Polyps - Specificity

    The accuracy parameters (i.e. specificity) were evaluated for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 6 mm and for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 10 mm by constructing 2X2 matrix (i.e. PCCE-2 performance versus the standard colonoscopy), where sensitivity and specificity, are presented with 95% Cl based on the binomial distribution. Standard colonoscopy is considered the gold standard.

    within 7 days

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Diagnostic Yield of PillCam™ COLON 2 in Detecting Colonic Lesions

    within 7 days

  • Percent of Participants With Scoring Index 3 or 4 (Good or Excellent)

    within 7 days

  • Capsule Excretion Time

    within 7 days

Study Arms (1)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects that are indicated for colonoscopy, who are suspected or known to suffer from large bowel diseases.

Device: PillCam™ (Capsule Endoscopy) Colon 2 capsule

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is between the ages of 18-70
  • Subject was referred to colonoscopy for at least one of the following reasons:
  • Colorectal cancer screening for age ≥60
  • Clinical symptoms such as: rectal bleeding, hematochezia, melena, positive FOBT, recent change of bowel habits for age ≥50
  • Positive findings in the colon (e.g. Polyp ≥10mm)
  • Personal history of significant polyps( ≥6mm )that were removed at least 3 years ago (3 years and above)

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \> 70 years
  • Subject has dysphagia or any swallowing disorder
  • Subject has congestive heart failure
  • Subject has known renal disease
  • Subject is not eligible for colon preparation due to the presence of underlying conditions based on the clinical judgment of the investigator
  • Subject has any allergy or other known contraindication to the medications used in the study
  • Subject has had prior abdominal surgery of the gastrointestinal tract other than uncomplicated procedures that would be unlikely to lead to bowel obstruction based on the clinical judgment of the investigator
  • Subject has a cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electro medical device.
  • Subject is expected to undergo MRI examination within 7 days after ingestion of the capsule.
  • Subject with any condition believed to have an increased risk for capsule retention such as Crohn's disease, intestinal tumors, radiation enteritis, incomplete colonoscopies due to obstructions or NSAID enteropathy,
  • Subject with gastrointestinal motility disorders
  • Subject has known delayed gastric emptying
  • Subject has any condition, which precludes compliance with study and/or device instructions.
  • Women who are either pregnant at the time of screening, or are of child-bearing potential and do not practice medically acceptable methods of contraception.
  • Subject suffers from life threatening conditions
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Indiana University Medical Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Location

Digestive Care, Inc.

Beavercreek, Ohio, 45440, United States

Location

Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater

Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Morgan DR, Malik PR, Romeo DP, Rex DK. Initial US evaluation of second-generation capsule colonoscopy for detecting colon polyps. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2016 May 3;3(1):e000089. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2016-000089. eCollection 2016.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic DiseasesIntestinal Diseases

Interventions

Capsule Endoscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalEndoscopy, Digestive SystemEndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Results Point of Contact

Title
Hilla Debby/Director of clinical affairs
Organization
Givenimaging

Study Officials

  • Douglas Rex, Dr.

    Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2010

First Posted

March 16, 2010

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

May 1, 2010

Study Completion

May 1, 2010

Last Updated

October 22, 2020

Results First Posted

June 8, 2012

Record last verified: 2020-09

Locations