PillCam™ Colon Capsule Endoscopy (PCCE) in the Visualization of the Colon
MA-53
Evaluation of PillCam™ Colon Capsule Endoscopy (PCCE) in the Visualization of the Colon
1 other identifier
interventional
332
5 countries
7
Brief Summary
To see if PillCam COLON will demonstrate diagnostic yield \>80% in detecting significant colonic pathologies when compared to colonoscopy in the target population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Oct 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 18, 2011
CompletedAugust 1, 2019
August 1, 2010
1 year
January 24, 2008
July 7, 2010
July 29, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participants With Successful Capsule Endoscopies or Standard Colonoscopies
The number of participants that completed the capsule endoscopy procedure with video images of the entire colon that could be read by a clinician, or subsequently had a full colonoscopy with visualization by a different clinician. The number of successful procedures of each type are reported.
1 day
Number of Participants With Indicated Lesions Detected by Standard Colonoscopy
Since the standard colonoscopy is the "gold standard" to which the PillCam is to be compared, the number of participants with the indicated lesions identified by a trained clinician using standard colonoscopy procedures is reported here. Note that some Participants had multiple lesions and so could be included in more than one size category. Advanced adenoma is defined as 1) an adenoma 1 cm or larger or 2) an adenoma with villous features or high-grade dysplasia. All colorectal cancers were 6mm or larger.
1 day
Sensitivity of Capsule Endoscopy for Indicated Lesions
Readings of videos from the PillCam COLON were performed by trained physicians who identified lesions (types and sizes). Sensitivity was calculated as the percentage of participants who had positive findings on capsule endoscopy (of a specified category) among those participants who had positive findings on colonoscopy of the same category (reported in Outcome Measure 1). The false negative rate is equal to 1 - sensitivity and indicated the percentage of lesions missed by capsule endoscopy.
1 day
Specificity of Capsule Endoscopy for Indicated Lesions
Readings of videos from the PillCam COLON were performed by trained physicians who identified lesions (types and sizes). Specificity was calculated as the percentage of participants who had negative findings on capsule endoscopy (of a specified category) among participants with negative colonoscopy findings of the same category (reported in Outcome Measure 1). This corresponds to 1 - the false positive rate.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Percent of Participants With Scoring Index 3 or 4
1 day
Number, Type and Severity of Adverse Events
Within 7 days
Accuracy Parameters (Sensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predicted Value, Positive Predicted Value) of Colon Capsule Endoscopy, Compared to Standard Colonoscopy
within 7 days
Percentage of Excreted Colon Capsules
Within 7 days
Colon Capsule Endoscopy Transit Time Per Section (Stomach, Small Bowel, Colon)
within 7 days
Study Arms (1)
PillCam COLON and Colonoscopy
EXPERIMENTALSubjects that are indicated for colonoscopy, who are suspected or known to suffer from large bowel diseases, had capsule endoscopy with PillCam COLON after bowel preparation and before standard colonoscopy.
Interventions
The PillCam COLON capsule is an ingestible capsule equipped with an endoscope that has two imagers, enabling it to acquire video images from both ends. the device measures 31 by 11 mm and acquires images at a rate of 4 frames per second. Recording and downloading of data are similar those of the data for small-bowel capsule endoscopy.
Standard colonoscopy was the standard against which capsule endoscopy was compared,and it was performed after capsule endoscopy (after capsule excretion or at least 10 hours after capsule ingestion, whichever came first), on either the same day as ingestion or the next morning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject was referred for colonoscopy for one of the following reasons:
- Subjects over ≥ 50 years of age with one or more of the following clinical symptoms: rectal bleeding, hematochezia, melena, positive Fecal Occoult Blood Test (FOBT), recent change of bowel habits, or diarrhea/constipation of recent onset.
- Any subject ≥ 18 years of age with:
- Positive findings in the colon on a GastroIntestinal (GI) radiographic study
- Personal history of colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenomatous colonic polyps and at least 3 years since last colonoscopy
- Suspected or known ulcerative colitis
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has dysphagia
- Subject has congestive heart failure
- Subject has renal insufficiency
- Subject is known or is suspected to suffer from intestinal obstruction.
- Chronic use of laxatives
- Subject has a cardiac pacemakers or other implanted electro medical devices.
- Women who are either pregnant or nursing at the time of screening, who intend to be during the study period, or are of child-bearing potential and do not practice medically acceptable methods of contraception.
- Subject is expected to undergo MRI examination within 7 days after ingestion of the capsule.
- Subject has had prior abdominal surgery of the gastrointestinal tract other than uncomplicated procedures that would be unlikely to lead to bowel obstruction based on the clinical judgment of the investigator.
- Subject has any condition, which precludes compliance with study and/or device instructions.
- Age \< 18 years
- Subject suffers from life threatening conditions
- Subject is currently participating in another clinical study
- Subject has known slow gastric emptying time
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medtronic - MITGlead
Study Sites (7)
CHU Lyon
Lyon, France
CHU Nancy
Nancy, France
Evangelisches Krankenhaus
Düsseldorf, Germany
AK Altona
Hamburg, Germany
Ospedale Gemelli
Rome, Italy
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
Pamplona, Spain
St.Marks&Northwick Park hospital
Harrow, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I, Carretero C, Gay G, Delvaux M, Lapalus MG, Ponchon T, Neuhaus H, Philipper M, Costamagna G, Riccioni ME, Spada C, Petruzziello L, Fraser C, Postgate A, Fitzpatrick A, Hagenmuller F, Keuchel M, Schoofs N, Deviere J. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):264-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806347.
PMID: 19605831RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Hila Debby
- Organization
- Given Imaging
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacques DEVIERE, M.D
Erasme University Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2008
First Posted
January 30, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
October 1, 2007
Study Completion
October 1, 2007
Last Updated
August 1, 2019
Results First Posted
February 18, 2011
Record last verified: 2010-08