NCT00604162

Brief Summary

To see if PillCam COLON will demonstrate diagnostic yield \>80% in detecting significant colonic pathologies when compared to colonoscopy in the target population.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
332

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2006

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
5 countries

7 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2006

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2007

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 24, 2008

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 30, 2008

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 18, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

January 24, 2008

Results QC Date

July 7, 2010

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Suspected colonic diseaseKnown colonic disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of Participants With Successful Capsule Endoscopies or Standard Colonoscopies

    The number of participants that completed the capsule endoscopy procedure with video images of the entire colon that could be read by a clinician, or subsequently had a full colonoscopy with visualization by a different clinician. The number of successful procedures of each type are reported.

    1 day

  • Number of Participants With Indicated Lesions Detected by Standard Colonoscopy

    Since the standard colonoscopy is the "gold standard" to which the PillCam is to be compared, the number of participants with the indicated lesions identified by a trained clinician using standard colonoscopy procedures is reported here. Note that some Participants had multiple lesions and so could be included in more than one size category. Advanced adenoma is defined as 1) an adenoma 1 cm or larger or 2) an adenoma with villous features or high-grade dysplasia. All colorectal cancers were 6mm or larger.

    1 day

  • Sensitivity of Capsule Endoscopy for Indicated Lesions

    Readings of videos from the PillCam COLON were performed by trained physicians who identified lesions (types and sizes). Sensitivity was calculated as the percentage of participants who had positive findings on capsule endoscopy (of a specified category) among those participants who had positive findings on colonoscopy of the same category (reported in Outcome Measure 1). The false negative rate is equal to 1 - sensitivity and indicated the percentage of lesions missed by capsule endoscopy.

    1 day

  • Specificity of Capsule Endoscopy for Indicated Lesions

    Readings of videos from the PillCam COLON were performed by trained physicians who identified lesions (types and sizes). Specificity was calculated as the percentage of participants who had negative findings on capsule endoscopy (of a specified category) among participants with negative colonoscopy findings of the same category (reported in Outcome Measure 1). This corresponds to 1 - the false positive rate.

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Percent of Participants With Scoring Index 3 or 4

    1 day

  • Number, Type and Severity of Adverse Events

    Within 7 days

  • Accuracy Parameters (Sensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predicted Value, Positive Predicted Value) of Colon Capsule Endoscopy, Compared to Standard Colonoscopy

    within 7 days

  • Percentage of Excreted Colon Capsules

    Within 7 days

  • Colon Capsule Endoscopy Transit Time Per Section (Stomach, Small Bowel, Colon)

    within 7 days

Study Arms (1)

PillCam COLON and Colonoscopy

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects that are indicated for colonoscopy, who are suspected or known to suffer from large bowel diseases, had capsule endoscopy with PillCam COLON after bowel preparation and before standard colonoscopy.

Device: PillCam COLONProcedure: Standard colonoscopy

Interventions

The PillCam COLON capsule is an ingestible capsule equipped with an endoscope that has two imagers, enabling it to acquire video images from both ends. the device measures 31 by 11 mm and acquires images at a rate of 4 frames per second. Recording and downloading of data are similar those of the data for small-bowel capsule endoscopy.

PillCam COLON and Colonoscopy

Standard colonoscopy was the standard against which capsule endoscopy was compared,and it was performed after capsule endoscopy (after capsule excretion or at least 10 hours after capsule ingestion, whichever came first), on either the same day as ingestion or the next morning.

PillCam COLON and Colonoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject was referred for colonoscopy for one of the following reasons:
  • Subjects over ≥ 50 years of age with one or more of the following clinical symptoms: rectal bleeding, hematochezia, melena, positive Fecal Occoult Blood Test (FOBT), recent change of bowel habits, or diarrhea/constipation of recent onset.
  • Any subject ≥ 18 years of age with:
  • Positive findings in the colon on a GastroIntestinal (GI) radiographic study
  • Personal history of colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenomatous colonic polyps and at least 3 years since last colonoscopy
  • Suspected or known ulcerative colitis

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has dysphagia
  • Subject has congestive heart failure
  • Subject has renal insufficiency
  • Subject is known or is suspected to suffer from intestinal obstruction.
  • Chronic use of laxatives
  • Subject has a cardiac pacemakers or other implanted electro medical devices.
  • Women who are either pregnant or nursing at the time of screening, who intend to be during the study period, or are of child-bearing potential and do not practice medically acceptable methods of contraception.
  • Subject is expected to undergo MRI examination within 7 days after ingestion of the capsule.
  • Subject has had prior abdominal surgery of the gastrointestinal tract other than uncomplicated procedures that would be unlikely to lead to bowel obstruction based on the clinical judgment of the investigator.
  • Subject has any condition, which precludes compliance with study and/or device instructions.
  • Age \< 18 years
  • Subject suffers from life threatening conditions
  • Subject is currently participating in another clinical study
  • Subject has known slow gastric emptying time

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

CHU Lyon

Lyon, France

Location

CHU Nancy

Nancy, France

Location

Evangelisches Krankenhaus

Düsseldorf, Germany

Location

AK Altona

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Ospedale Gemelli

Rome, Italy

Location

Clinica Universitaria de Navarra

Pamplona, Spain

Location

St.Marks&Northwick Park hospital

Harrow, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I, Carretero C, Gay G, Delvaux M, Lapalus MG, Ponchon T, Neuhaus H, Philipper M, Costamagna G, Riccioni ME, Spada C, Petruzziello L, Fraser C, Postgate A, Fitzpatrick A, Hagenmuller F, Keuchel M, Schoofs N, Deviere J. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):264-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806347.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Hila Debby
Organization
Given Imaging

Study Officials

  • Jacques DEVIERE, M.D

    Erasme University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2008

First Posted

January 30, 2008

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion

October 1, 2007

Study Completion

October 1, 2007

Last Updated

August 1, 2019

Results First Posted

February 18, 2011

Record last verified: 2010-08

Locations