Random Comparison of LigaSure and Disposable Staples for Laparoscopic Surgery
A Randomized Trial Comparing Outcomes for the LigaSure and Disposable Stapling Instruments for Laparoscopic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to compare two different standard of care surgical methods for the following large bowel (colon) procedures: laparoscopic right colectomy, total colectomy, and left colectomy. The study will compare electrocautery, used with surgical clips and/or surgical staplers, and the Ligasure vessel sealer. The investigators will be looking at which procedure is faster and more cost efficient and the investigators will calculate hospital expenses for the two groups to make comparisons.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2010
CompletedDecember 15, 2014
December 1, 2014
3.9 years
June 15, 2007
December 12, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
this study will evaluate the surgical approach using the Ligasure device at six weeks post operative.
The objective of this study is to determine the best technical approach to laparoscopic right total and left colectomy by comparing the utilization of the Ligasure device to electrocautery with the application of surgical clips and or surgical staples. Safety, cost, operative time, time to pedicle ligation and hemostasis will be objectively measured in each treatment group.
6 weeks post-op
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Will evaluate the surgical approach using electrocautery with surgical clips and staples
6 weeks post op
Study Arms (2)
Group A
OTHERStandard of Care
Group B
OTHERStandard of Care
Interventions
laparoscopic colectomy using the Ligasure device
laparoscopic colectomy using clips, cautery and stapler
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who have benign or malignant colonic or rectal disease that mandate resection and are approached laparoscopically. Potential indications or conditions include ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, colorectal polyps, colorectal malignancy, endometriosis, diverticulitis, and colonic inertia
- Subjects who are 18 years of age and older
- Subjects of either sex
- Subjects who are willing and able to adhere to protocol requirements, agree to participate in the study program and provide written and informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who undergo conversion to the open approach before mobilization of the colon or pedicle ligation will be excluded from the analysis
- Subjects who are pregnant
- Subjects who have undergone a previous colectomy
- Subjects with a medical condition that may interfere with the evaluation of safety or effectiveness of the study device
- Subjects who have another condition that in the opinion of the investigator precludes further participation in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Related Publications (1)
Adamina M, Champagne BJ, Hoffman L, Ermlich MB, Delaney CP. Randomized clinical trial comparing the cost and effectiveness of bipolar vessel sealers versus clips and vascular staplers for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2011 Dec;98(12):1703-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7679. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
PMID: 21997317DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Conor P. Delaney, MD, PhD
University Hospitals of Cleveland/ Institute for Surgical Innovation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2007
First Posted
June 18, 2007
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
November 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 15, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12