NCT00487409

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to compare two different standard of care surgical methods for the following large bowel (colon) procedures: laparoscopic right colectomy, total colectomy, and left colectomy. The study will compare electrocautery, used with surgical clips and/or surgical staplers, and the Ligasure vessel sealer. The investigators will be looking at which procedure is faster and more cost efficient and the investigators will calculate hospital expenses for the two groups to make comparisons.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2006

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2006

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 15, 2007

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2007

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

December 15, 2014

Status Verified

December 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

June 15, 2007

Last Update Submit

December 12, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Ulcerative colitisCrohn's diseaseColorectal polypsColorectal malignancyEndometriosisDiverticulitisColonic inertia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • this study will evaluate the surgical approach using the Ligasure device at six weeks post operative.

    The objective of this study is to determine the best technical approach to laparoscopic right total and left colectomy by comparing the utilization of the Ligasure device to electrocautery with the application of surgical clips and or surgical staples. Safety, cost, operative time, time to pedicle ligation and hemostasis will be objectively measured in each treatment group.

    6 weeks post-op

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Will evaluate the surgical approach using electrocautery with surgical clips and staples

    6 weeks post op

Study Arms (2)

Group A

OTHER

Standard of Care

Procedure: Disposable stapling instruments

Group B

OTHER

Standard of Care

Procedure: Bipolar electrosurgical generator and instruments

Interventions

laparoscopic colectomy using the Ligasure device

Also known as: Ligasure Device
Group B

laparoscopic colectomy using clips, cautery and stapler

Also known as: Staples or Clips
Group A

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects who have benign or malignant colonic or rectal disease that mandate resection and are approached laparoscopically. Potential indications or conditions include ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, colorectal polyps, colorectal malignancy, endometriosis, diverticulitis, and colonic inertia
  • Subjects who are 18 years of age and older
  • Subjects of either sex
  • Subjects who are willing and able to adhere to protocol requirements, agree to participate in the study program and provide written and informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who undergo conversion to the open approach before mobilization of the colon or pedicle ligation will be excluded from the analysis
  • Subjects who are pregnant
  • Subjects who have undergone a previous colectomy
  • Subjects with a medical condition that may interfere with the evaluation of safety or effectiveness of the study device
  • Subjects who have another condition that in the opinion of the investigator precludes further participation in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Adamina M, Champagne BJ, Hoffman L, Ermlich MB, Delaney CP. Randomized clinical trial comparing the cost and effectiveness of bipolar vessel sealers versus clips and vascular staplers for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2011 Dec;98(12):1703-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7679. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic DiseasesRectal DiseasesColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseEndometriosisDiverticulitisConstipation

Interventions

SuturesSurgical Instruments

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesColitisGastroenteritisInflammatory Bowel DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesDiverticular DiseasesSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical Fixation DevicesSurgical EquipmentEquipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Conor P. Delaney, MD, PhD

    University Hospitals of Cleveland/ Institute for Surgical Innovation

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2007

First Posted

June 18, 2007

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion

November 1, 2010

Study Completion

November 1, 2010

Last Updated

December 15, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-12

Locations