Mastery Learning Inguinal Hernia Repair
Mastery Learning Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: Linking Surgical Simulation to Patient Level Outcomes
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Abstract: Minimally invasive techniques are now ubiquitous in the management of surgical disease. Competence in laparoscopy requires specialized training and practice. With the decrease of resident work hours, training programs need to explore and adopt efficient strategies to teach and evaluate laparoscopic skills. For economic, ethical, and legal considerations, the operating room may no longer be the ideal environment for teaching these basic technical skills. There appears to be a role for simulation in response to this need. The transfer of laparoscopic skills learned in a simulated environment to the operating room has showed mixed results. Overall, it seems that surgical skills training outside the operating room is beneficial, but the best method(s) of designing, implementing and evaluating such skills curriculums have yet to be identified. The laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair is an example of a procedure that is associated with a steep learning curve and requires mastery of basic laparoscopic skills. In addition, an increased recurrence and complication rates in the early learning curve of this procedure, underscores the importance of adequate training. The current practice of teaching the TEP repair in the operating room under an apprenticeship-based model is associated with increased operative time and costs. We propose that the training of surgical trainees outside the operating room with a structured, mastery oriented simulation-based curriculum will help reduce the learning curve of the TEP repair, improve operative performance, and decrease operative time and costs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 10, 2011
CompletedOctober 28, 2016
September 1, 2016
11 months
March 10, 2010
May 16, 2011
September 26, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Participation-Corrected Operative Time
Operative time was recorded with a standard stopwatch, began at the start of the operative case and ended when procedure was terminated. We realized that the operative time for poorly performing trainees could be faster than the time for more skilled trainees because the supervising surgeon would perform a greater proportion of the procedure. We calculated participation-corrected time as raw total time + the time of staff involvement: time\_corrected = time\_raw + (1-participation) x time\_raw.
at first TEP procedure post-randomization; Due to surgical scheduling variability this can be anytime from 1 to 2 days following randomization to a week or two
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Operative Performance
at first TEP procedure post-randomization; due to surgical scheduling variability this can be anytime from 1 to 2 days following randomization to a week or two
Number of Hernia Repair Subjects With Post-Operative Urinary Retention
at first TEP procedure post-randomization, subjects were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 1 night
Study Arms (2)
Simulation Curriculum
EXPERIMENTALGeneral surgery residents will undergo a simulation-based educational curriculum (Mastery Learning TEP Curriculum) on TEP hernia repair
Current Practice
OTHERGeneral surgery residents will undergo current practice of learning how to perform the TEP repair in the operating room under direct supervision of the staff surgeon without any simulation pre-training.
Interventions
A simulation-based educational curriculum
The current practice of learning how to perform the TEP repair in the operating room is under direct supervision of the staff surgeon without any simulation pre-training.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- General surgery residents (male or female), regardless of age or previous laparoscopic experience, who are able to perform at least 2 TEP inguinal hernia repairs during the study period (January - December 2010)
- Postgraduate Year (PGY) 1 to PGY 5 general surgery residents.
- Have the procedure supervised by one of the following expert laparoscopic surgeons: Dr. David Farley, Dr. Bingener-Casey, Dr. Swain, Dr. Kendrick
You may not qualify if:
- \- PGY 1 designated preliminary residents (Urology, Orthopedics, Neurosurgery and Anesthesia) or PGY 1 non-designated preliminary residents who are applying to fields other than general surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
- National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55902, United States
Related Publications (1)
Zendejas B, Cook DA, Bingener J, Huebner M, Dunn WF, Sarr MG, Farley DR. Simulation-based mastery learning improves patient outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2011 Sep;254(3):502-9; discussion 509-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c6994.
PMID: 21865947RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Benjamin Zendejas, MD
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David R Farley, MD
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PI
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2010
First Posted
March 12, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 28, 2016
Results First Posted
June 10, 2011
Record last verified: 2016-09