NCT01591395

Brief Summary

Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical diseases. Over the past years, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy was established and gaining popularity in recent few years. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was associated with less post operative pain, a shorter recovery period, earlier return to normal daily activities and work, and better cosmetic results. The laparoscopic hernia repair usually require three working ports ranging from 5 to 10 mm. However, with each increasing laparoscopic ports usually associated with possible increasing morbidity and pain related to ports. Efforts are continuing to further reduce the port related morbidities and improve the cosmetic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery, including reduction of the size and number of ports. This has led to the evolution of a novel surgical approach now collectively known as laparoendoscopic single site surgery. LESS has been performed for variable indications including extirpative and reconstructive urologic procedure via the transperitoneal approach. Early experience has demonstrated the feasibility as well as the safe and successful completion of these LESS procedures. Although these initial reports are promising, the clinical advantages of LESS procedures over conventional laparoscopic procedures have not been defined. Therefore, we conducted a single center, randomized trial to compare the safety and other outcomes after conventional laparoscopic and LESS inguinal hernia repair in adult patients.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 2, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 4, 2012

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 7, 2012

Status Verified

May 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

May 2, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 4, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

inguinal hernialaparoscopylaparoendoscopic single-site surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual analogue pain score

    The pain score was recorded by a blinded observer at the time points of 2 hours post-op, 24 hours post-op and 7 days post-op with a Visual analoge pain scale (0-10 scale)

    7 days post-operatively

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • modified Medical Outcome Study (MOS)

    Post -op 6 months

  • systemic stress response to surgery

    post-operative 1 day

  • Testicular volume

    3 months post-operatively

  • intervention related complication

    6 months post-operatively

Study Arms (2)

Multiport TEP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Adult inguinal hernia patients who randomized to receive multiport endoscopic TEP repair

Procedure: laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair (single port vs. multiport)

LESS TEP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Adult inguinal hernia patients who randomized to receive laparoendoscopic single-site TEP repair

Procedure: laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair (single port vs. multiport)

Interventions

comparison of single port laparoscopic TEP and multiport laparoscopic TEP repair for adult inguinal hernia

LESS TEPMultiport TEP

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • primary or recurrent inguinal hernia

You may not qualify if:

  • previous major lower abdominal surgery, patient refusal of randomization, or unable to accept general anesthesia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei branch

Taipei, Taiwan, 231, Taiwan

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hernia, AbdominalHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Yao-Chou Tsai

    289 Jianguo Road, Xindian city, Taipei, Taiwan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2012

First Posted

May 4, 2012

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 7, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-05

Locations