Paravertebral Blocks: Pilot Study to Compare Nerve Stimulation vs. Anatomic Landmarks in Inguinal Hernia Repair
PVB
Paravertebral Blocks Techniques: A Pilot Study to Compare Nerve Stimulation vs. Anatomic Landmarks for Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Primary aim: 1\. To compare the nerve stimulation vs. anatomic techniques of paravertebral block of T11-L1 in providing surgical anesthesia for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Secondary aims:
- 1.Compare VAS pain scores in the two groups of patients over the first 24 hours.
- 2.Compare opioid intake over the first 24 hours in the two groups of patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2009
CompletedFebruary 23, 2010
February 1, 2010
1.8 years
December 21, 2007
February 22, 2010
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful full block at T11-L1
Every 10 minutes until full block achieved
Study Arms (2)
Nerve Stimulation
OTHERUse of nerve stimulator for placement of PVB nerve block
Anatomic landmarks
OTHERUse of anatomic landmarks for placement of PVB block
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral open inguinal herniorrhaphy
- Patient must be \>18 years of age
- ASA physical status of I, II, or III
- Patient competent to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patient \< 18 years of age
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patient unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
- Contraindications to regional anesthesia
- Allergy to amide local anesthetics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven R. Clendenen, M.D.
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2007
First Posted
January 7, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
May 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 23, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-02