Patient Acuity Rating: a Tool to Prevent In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
PAR
Strategies to Predict and Prevent In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of medical personnel in their ability to predict the likelihood of non-intensive care (ICU), ward patients to clinically deteriorate (defined as a cardiac arrest, unplanned ICU transfer, or unexpected death)via the use of a clinical judgement-based tool designed for this study, Patient Acuity Rating (PAR), to predict short-term clinical deterioration. We will compare the ability of this tool to predict clinical deterioration compared to accepted physiology-based tools and tools combining judgment and physiology as well as other markers of deterioration such as physician order changes. We will compare the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of these combined models to the predictive models including only physiology or clinical judgment. We will assess the correlation between specific physician orders and patient deterioration to determine whether specific clinical activities, such as emergently obtained radiology exams, predict impending deterioration. We hypothesize that PAR will be a useful tool for predicting clinical deterioration across the institution and that it will have a higher average accuracy for predicting clinical deterioration in non-ICU inpatients within 24 hours than the physiology-based tools alone. We further hypothesize that a combined metric which includes both the PAR and the individual physiologic components that comprise physiologic tools will not significantly improve prediction over the PAR alone. We further propose to use PAR to prospectively risk stratify patients for preemptive evaluation by the Rapid Response Team. We hypothesize that intervening on high risk patients by preemptively activating the hospital's Rapid Response Team (to assess and treat patients as needed) will decrease cardiac arrest rates and mortality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Oct 2009
Longer than P75 for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedApril 7, 2016
April 1, 2016
4.2 years
March 5, 2010
April 6, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mortality and cardiac arrest rates
Non-ICU ward inpatients will be randomized on admission to an RRT surveillance group or standard of care. Daily risk prediction scores will be collected for all non-ICU inpatients. Those with high scores, who have been randomized to the surveillance arm, will be included on a list of patients, updated daily, that the Rapid Response Team will receive, with instructions to evaluate and intervene, if required, without waiting for formal activation by the usual channels. Outcomes for these patients will be compared to those with comparable risk scores who were randomized to the control group.
15 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Length of stay
15 months
Cost
15 months
Time to ICU transfer
15 months
Study Arms (1)
prevention
OTHERInterventions
Non-ICU inpatients will be randomized on admission to an RRT surveillance group or standard of care. Daily risk prediction scores will be collected for all non-ICU inpatients. Those with high scores, who have been randomized to the surveillance arm, will be included on a list of patients, updated daily, that the Rapid Response Team will receive, with instructions to evaluate and intervene, if required, without waiting for formal activation by the usual channels.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non-ICU ward inpatients
- PAR of 5 or above
- Ages 18+ years
You may not qualify if:
- ICU or outpatients
- PAR of 4 or lower
- Ages 17 years and under
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Related Publications (1)
Phillips AW, Yuen TC, Retzer E, Woodruff J, Arora V, Edelson DP. Supplementing cross-cover communication with the patient acuity rating. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar;28(3):406-11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2257-4. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
PMID: 23129163DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dana P Edelson, MD, MS
University of Chicago
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2010
First Posted
March 9, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04