NCT01078389

Brief Summary

This purpose of this study is to assess the effect of febuxostat, once daily (QD), on joint damage in patients with elevated serum urate levels and gout.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
314

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2010

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

56 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 26, 2010

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 2, 2010

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2013

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 10, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

September 10, 2014

Status Verified

September 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

February 26, 2010

Results QC Date

September 3, 2014

Last Update Submit

September 3, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

GoutHyperuricemiaUric AcidDrug Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected Joint

    The single affected joint was defined as the joint with the history of the first acute gout flare. Radiographs (X-rays) of this single joint in the hands or feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst). Individual erosion scores were summed to a maximum erosion score of 5 for joints in the hands and 10 for joints in the feet. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Baseline and Month 24

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet Radiographs

    Baseline and Month 24

  • Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet Radiographs

    Baseline and Month 24

  • Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected Joint

    Baseline and Month 24

  • Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Score of the Single Affected Joint

    Baseline and Month 24

Study Arms (2)

Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg (based on serum urate levels at Day 14), capsules, orally, once daily for up to 24 Months.

Drug: Febuxostat

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Febuxostat placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 24 Months.

Drug: Placebo for Febuxostat

Interventions

Febuxostat capsules

Also known as: Uloric, TMX-67
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg

Febuxostat placebo-matching capsules

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The participant, or the participant's legally acceptable representative, signs a written informed consent form/Health Insurance Portability \& Accountability Act (HIPAA) Authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
  • Must have a history or presence of gout defined as having one or more of the following conditions of the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) preliminary criteria for the diagnosis of gout
  • A tophus proven to contain urate crystals by chemical or polarized light microscopic means and/or
  • Characteristic urate crystals in the joint fluid and/or
  • History of at least 6 of the following clinical, laboratory and x-ray phenomena\*: \*More than one flare criteria will be excluded for the purpose of this study if the participant has a history of only a single acute gout flare.
  • More than one attack of acute arthritis\*
  • maximum inflammation developed within 1 day
  • monoarticular arthritis
  • redness observed over joints
  • first metatarsophalangeal joint painful or swollen
  • unilateral first metatarsophalangeal joint attack
  • unilateral tarsal joint attack
  • tophus (proven or suspected)
  • hyperuricemia
  • asymmetric swelling within a joint on x-ray
  • +9 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Previously on urate-lowering therapy (allopurinol, febuxostat or probenecid).
  • Has secondary hyperuricemia (eg due to myeloproliferative disorder or organ transplant).
  • Has a history of xanthinuria.
  • Has a known hypersensitivity to any component of the febuxostat formulation.
  • Has rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Has active peptic ulcer disease.
  • Has a history of cancer, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin, which has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study medication.
  • Has experienced either a myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke within 90 days prior to the Screening visit.
  • Has alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values greater than 2.0 the upper limit of normal during the Screening period.
  • Has a significant medical condition and/or conditions that would interfere with the treatment, safety or compliance with the protocol at the discretion of the Investigator.
  • Has a history of drug abuse (defined as any illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse with 5 years prior to the Screening visit. Participant consumes \>14 alcoholic beverages/week.
  • Has received any investigational medicinal product within 30 days prior to the Screening visit. In addition, the participant has been previously randomized into this study and received at least one dose of double blind study drug treatment.
  • Has an estimated Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 mL/min calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula by the Central Laboratory.
  • Has a serum creatinine at Screening greater than 2.0 mg/dL.
  • Has a known history of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus.
  • +9 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (56)

Unknown Facility

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Burbank, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carmichael, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Costa Mesa, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Irvine, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orange, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Trumbull, Connecticut, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sanford, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampa, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Avon, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Greenfield, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rockport, Maine, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chaska, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Belzoni, Mississippi, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Billings, Montana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Missoula, Montana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lenoir, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Shelby, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Franklin, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

East Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Southlake, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Burke, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Manassas, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kenosha, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Dalbeth N, Saag KG, Palmer WE, Choi HK, Hunt B, MacDonald PA, Thienel U, Gunawardhana L. Effects of Febuxostat in Early Gout: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Dec;69(12):2386-2395. doi: 10.1002/art.40233.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

GoutHyperuricemia

Interventions

Febuxostat

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesCrystal ArthropathiesRheumatic DiseasesPurine-Pyrimidine Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsMetabolism, Inborn ErrorsGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThiazolesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Director, Clinical Science
Organization
Takeda

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Takeda

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2010

First Posted

March 2, 2010

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion

September 1, 2013

Study Completion

September 1, 2013

Last Updated

September 10, 2014

Results First Posted

September 10, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-09

Locations