NCT01075217

Brief Summary

No significant differences is expected in observed motion artifacts, heat or pain reported during peripheral DSA performed for diagnostic and/or endovascular therapeutic purposes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
174

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 23, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 25, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2010

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 23, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

May 30, 2013

Status Verified

April 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

February 23, 2010

Results QC Date

February 25, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Level of Pain/Heat in the Lower Extremities Scored by the Participants on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Following Intra-arterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA

    The 10-centimeter Pain VAS was completed by the Group 1 patients to assess his/her pain level (not scoring heat separately from pain) in the lower extremity of interest. The scale was 0 to 10 cm, with the left end (0 cm)of the scale indicating no pain and the right end (10 cm) of the scale indicating the worst pain. The 10-centimeter Pain VAS (excluding Heat assessment, which was separately assessed) was completed by the Group 2 patients to assess his/her pain level in the lower extremity of interest. The scale was 0 to 10 cm, with the left end (0 cm)of the scale indicating no pain and the right end (10 cm) of the scale indicating the worst pain. Group 1 completed the Pain VAS (heat not separate from pain). Group 2 completed the Pain VAS for pain only and, separately, the Heat VAS for heat only.

    immediately after administration of agent using a power injector for the administration

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Level of Heat in the Lower Extremities Scored by Group 2 as Assessed on the Heat VAS Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA

    Immediately after administration of agent using a power injector for the administration

  • The Number of Participants With Significant Motion Artifacts (Scores of 3 or 4) Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA.

    Immediately postdose

  • The Number of Participants Requiring Repeat Injection(s) Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA.

    Immediately postdose

  • The Number of Participants With Adequate Quality of Opacification Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA

    Immediately postdose

Study Arms (2)

Isovue 250 (iopamidol)

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: iopamidol

Visipaque 270 (iodixanol)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: iodixanol

Interventions

Participants received at least one intraarterial injection in one of the following 3 locations: aortic bifurcation (total volume 15-20 mL), iliac arteries (total volume 10-12 mL), or superficial femoral artery (total volume 8-12 mL to view only thigh, 10-15 mL to view calf as well, 20 mL for full runoff to foot).

Also known as: Other name: Isovue 250
Isovue 250 (iopamidol)

Participants received at least one intraarterial injection in one of the following 3 locations: aortic bifurcation (total volume 15-20 mL), iliac arteries (total volume 10-12 mL), or superficial femoral artery (total volume 8-12 mL to view only thigh, 10-15 mL to view calf as well, 20 mL for full runoff to foot).

Also known as: Other name: Visipaque 270
Visipaque 270 (iodixanol)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • provides written informed consent;
  • at least 18 years of age;
  • scheduled to undergo peripheral DSA for the diagnosis and/or treatment of PAOD

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnant or lactating female;
  • known allergies to one more more ingredients in wither product;
  • history of severe congestive heart failure (Class IV);
  • previously enrolled or received an investigational compound within 30 days;
  • history of hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast agents;
  • renal impairment eGFR \<60 mL/min/1.73m2, calculated using the MDRD study equation
  • any other medical condition decreasing chances of obtaining reliable data

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bracco Diagnostics

Princeton, New Jersey, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease 1

Interventions

Iopamidoliodixanol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Triiodobenzoic AcidsIodobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbons

Results Point of Contact

Title
Usha Halemane
Organization
Bracco Diagnostics Inc

Study Officials

  • Martin Krix, M.D.

    Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2010

First Posted

February 25, 2010

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

May 30, 2013

Results First Posted

May 23, 2013

Record last verified: 2012-04

Locations