Iodixanol Versus Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Imaging of Abdomen/Pelvis
A Phase 4 Randomized, Double-blind Study Comparing Patient Comfort and Safety Between Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL and Iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis
1 other identifier
interventional
304
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare overall patient comfort profile between the Iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM), iodixanol 320 mg I/mL, and a Low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM), iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in patients undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) imaging of the abdomen/pelvis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started May 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 19, 2013
CompletedDecember 19, 2013
November 1, 2013
5 months
June 16, 2011
May 30, 2013
November 5, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Frequency of Subjects With Moderate/Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
Number of subjects experiencing any moderate (score of 4 - 7) to severe (score 8 - 10) discomfort for cold or heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.
Within 10 minutes post contrast administration
Frequency of Subjects With Moderate / Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
Number of subjects experiencing moderate (score of 4 -7) to severe (score of 8 - 10) discomfort for cold, heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.
Within 10 minutes post contrast administration.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
Ten minutes post contrast administration.
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1-Iodixanol
OTHERArm 2-Iopamidol
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is over 18 years old.
- Subjects are referred to undergo a CECT imaging of the abdomen/pelvis as part of their routine clinical care.
You may not qualify if:
- The subject has known allergies to iodine or any prior history of adverse reaction to iodinated CM.
- The subject received another administration of CM within 24 hours prior to baseline or is scheduled to receive one within the 24 hour follow-up period.
- The subject is pregnant.
- The subject is taking metformin (e.g., Glucophage®) but is not willing or unable to discontinue at the time of the study procedure.
- The subject manifests thyrotoxicosis or is on dialysis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GE Healthcarelead
- i3 Statprobecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
GE Healthcare
Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Lauren Lim, PharmD
- Organization
- GE Healthcare
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lauren Lim, PharmD
GE Healthcare
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2011
First Posted
June 20, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 19, 2013
Results First Posted
December 19, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11