NCT00740207

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare ISOVUE-250 and VISIPAQUE 270 for motion artifact and pain following intraarterial injection for peripheral DSA.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
33

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2008

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 20, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2008

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2008

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2009

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 18, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

May 9, 2011

Status Verified

May 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

August 20, 2008

Results QC Date

September 13, 2010

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2011

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Level of Pain in the Lower Extremities Scored by the Participants on the Visual Analog Scale Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA.

    Visual Analog Scale: Patients were asked to mark on a 10 centimeter line where their pain was in the lower extremity of interest, in relation to the 2 extremes: no pain (0) on the far left and worst pain (10) on the far right. Pain Severity Scale: (0) None = VAS Score 0; (1) Mild = VAS Score 1-3; (2) Moderate = VAS Score 4-6; (3) Severe = VAS Score 7-10. Patients were assessed immediately prior to injection and again immediately following injection.

    Immediately prior to power injection run and again immediately following power injection run

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The Number of Participants With Motion Artifacts Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA.

    Immediately postdose

  • The Number of Participants Requiring Repeat Injection(s) Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA.

    Immediately postdose

Study Arms (2)

Isovue 250

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Isovue 250

VISIPAQUE 270

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: VISIPAQUE 270

Interventions

VISIPAQUE 270 (Iodixanol Injection) is provided in bottles/flexible containers, ready to use sterile, pyrogen-free colorless to pale yellow solution

Also known as: Iodixanol Injection
VISIPAQUE 270

ISOVUE-250 (Iopamidol Injection) is provided in single dose bottles/vials, ready to use, aqueous, nonpyrogenic, colorless to pale yellow sterile solution

Also known as: Iopamidol Injection
Isovue 250

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Provides written Informed Consent and is willing to comply with protocol requirements;
  • Is at least 18 years of age;
  • Is scheduled to undergo peripheral DSA for the diagnosis and/or treatment (PTA) of PAOD.

You may not qualify if:

  • Is a pregnant or lactating female. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy:
  • by testing on site at the institution (serum or urine βHCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of investigational product administration,
  • by surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy),
  • post menopausal with a minimum 1 year without menses;
  • Has any known allergy to one or more of the ingredients of the investigational products;
  • Has a history of severe congestive heart failure \[class IV in accordance with the classification of the New York Heart Association (NYHA)\]
  • Was previously entered into this study or received an investigational compound within 30 days before admission into this study;
  • Has a history of hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast agents;
  • Has renal impairment (eGFR \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2, calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease \[MDRD\] study equation , );
  • Has any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study and/or postdose follow-up examinations.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease 1

Interventions

iodixanolIopamidol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Triiodobenzoic AcidsIodobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbons

Results Point of Contact

Title
Usha Halemane
Organization
Bracco Diagnostics Inc.

Study Officials

  • Steven N. Sireci, MD

    Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2008

First Posted

August 22, 2008

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2009

Study Completion

July 1, 2009

Last Updated

May 9, 2011

Results First Posted

April 18, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-05