Study to Determine the Digestive and Physiological Effects of an Extract From Bran in Healthy Men and Women
A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial to Assess the Digestive and Physiological Effects of a Wheat Bran Extract in Healthy Men and Women
1 other identifier
interventional
65
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether two doses of an extract from bran demonstrate a prebiotic effect on colonic bacteria (by modulating selected fecal microbial populations, particularly bifidobacteria). The secondary objective is to measure the potential beneficial effects of consuming an extract from bran on the following physiological parameters: laxation, fecal pH, fecal moisture and stool consistency, blood glucose and insulin concentrations, plasma lipid profiles and serum free fatty acids, colonic bacterial short chain fatty acid production, ammonia metabolism and protein degradation, and biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 healthy
Started Mar 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2010
CompletedFebruary 23, 2010
February 1, 2010
4 months
February 19, 2010
February 22, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome variable will be the difference between treatments in bifidobacteria counts per g of feces, expressed as log10 cells per g feces (dry weight)
Baseline to end of each treatment (week 0 to week 3 of each treatment)
Secondary Outcomes (24)
Other fecal bacterial counts
baseline to end of each treatment (week 0 to week 3 of each treatment)
laxation
baseline to end of each treatment (week 0 to week 3 of each treatment)
fecal pH
baseline to end of each treatment (week 0 to week 3 of each treatment)
fecal moisture
baseline to end of each treatment (week 0 to week 3 of each treatment)
stool consistency
baseline to end of each treatment (week 0 to week 3 of each treatment)
- +19 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Control cereal
PLACEBO COMPARATORgrain-based ready to eat cereal that does not contain active wheat bran extract
low dose
ACTIVE COMPARATORgrain-based ready to eat cereal containing a low dose of wheat bran extract
High dose
ACTIVE COMPARATORgrain-based ready to eat cereal that contains a high dose of wheat bran extract
Interventions
Comparison of control cereal (containing no added wheat bran extract)to two test cereals containing different amounts of added wheat bran extract
Comparison of control cereal (containing no added wheat bran extract) to two test cereals containing different amounts of added wheat bran extract
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female
- years of age
- Body mass index ≥18.5 and \<35.0 kg/m2
- Fasting LDL-C level ≥100 mg/dL and \<200 mg/dL
- Otherwise judged to be in good health, willing to maintain habitual food and beverage intake and physical activity patterns throughout the trial
You may not qualify if:
- Significant gastrointestinal condition
- Use of pre/probiotic foods or supplements
- Use of antibiotics
- Pregnancy
- Certain muscle, liver, kidney, lung or gastrointestinal conditions and medications
- Poorly controlled hypertension
- Cancer treated within prior 2 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kellogg Companylead
- Provident Clinical Researchcollaborator
- Tufts Universitycollaborator
- University of Torontocollaborator
- University of Readingcollaborator
- University of Saskatchewancollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Provident CRC
Glen Ellyn, Illinois, 60137, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kevin Maki, PhD
Provident Clinical Research and Consulting, Inc
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2010
First Posted
February 23, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 23, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-02