A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Safety of a New Monovalent Intranasal Influenza Vaccine
MI-MA205
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety of a New 6:2 Influenza Virus Reassortant in Healthy Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This prospective annual release study was designed to assess the safety of a monovalent influenza virus vaccine using a new strain recommended for the 2009-2010 influenza season not previously contained in the trivalent intranasal FluMist vaccine. Three hundred healthy adults received a single dose of vaccine or placebo and were followed for 180 days.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 healthy
Started May 2009
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 13, 2011
CompletedJuly 14, 2011
July 1, 2011
Same day
April 1, 2009
October 8, 2010
July 12, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Reporting Fever, Defined as Oral Temperature ≥ 101°F
The percentage of subjects with fever was compared between the two treatment groups based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% exact confidence interval (CI) for the rate difference (monovalent vaccine minus placebo). The upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI was evaluated against the pre-specified equivalence criterion of 5 percentage points which corresponded to the following hypotheses: - H0 (null): rate difference ≥ 5 percentage points, - HA (alternative): rate difference \< 5 percentage points.
Days 1-8 after vaccination
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom or at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
Days 1-8 after vaccination
Number of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom or at Least One AE
Days 1-15 after vaccination
Number of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD)
Days 1-29 after vaccination
Number of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD)
Days 1-181 after vaccination
Study Arms (2)
Monovalent influenza virus vaccine
EXPERIMENTALFrozen monovalent vaccine containing new strain
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo
Interventions
Monovalent vaccine was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing a total volume of 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer, egg allantoic fluid, and approximately 10\^7 FFU (fluorescent focus units) of the cold-adapted, attenuated, 6:2 reassortant influenza strain B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Victoria lineage).
Placebo was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, 18 to 49 years of age (not yet reached their 50th birthday) at the time of investigational product administration
- Healthy by medical history and physical exam
- Written informed consent and any locally required authorization (eg, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act \[HIPAA\] in the United States of America \[USA\], European Union \[EU\] Data Privacy Directive in the EU) obtained from the subject/legal representative prior to performing any protocol-related procedures, including screening evaluations
- Females of childbearing potential, unless surgically sterile (ie, bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or complete hysterectomy), had sterile male partner, were premenarchal or at least 2 years postmenopausal, or practiced abstinence, must have used 2 effective methods of avoiding pregnancy (including oral, transdermal, or implanted contraceptives, intrauterine device, female condom with spermicide, diaphragm with spermicide, cervical cap, or use of a condom with spermicide by the sexual partner) for at least 30 days prior to dosing with investigational product, and must have agreed to continue using such precautions for at least 90 days after dosing with investigational product; cessation of birth control after this point was to be discussed with a responsible physician. The subject must also have had a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 14 days prior to investigational product administration (if screening and administration of investigational product did not occur on the same day) and on the day of investigational product administration prior to randomization
- Males, unless surgically sterile, must have used 2 effective methods of birth control with a female partner and must have agreed to continue using such contraceptive precautions for at least 30 days after dosing with investigational product (from Day 1 through Day 31 of the study)
- Subject available by telephone
- Ability to understand and comply with the requirements of the protocol, as judged by the investigator
- Ability to complete follow-up period of 180 days after dosing as required by the protocol
You may not qualify if:
- History of hypersensitivity to any component of the vaccine, including egg or egg protein or serious, life-threatening, or severe reactions to previous influenza vaccinations
- History of hypersensitivity to gentamicin
- Any condition for which the inactivated influenza vaccine was indicated, including chronic disorders of the pulmonary or cardiovascular systems (eg, asthma), chronic metabolic diseases (eg, diabetes mellitus), renal dysfunction, or hemoglobinopathies that required regular medical follow-up or hospitalization during the preceding year
- Acute febrile (\> 100.0°F oral or equivalent) and/or clinically significant respiratory illness (eg, cough or sore throat) within 14 days prior to randomization
- Any known immunosuppressive condition or immune deficiency disease, including human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\] infection, or ongoing immunosuppressive therapy
- History of Guillain-Barré syndrome
- A household contact who was severely immunocompromised (eg, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient, during those periods in which the immunocompromised individual required care in a protective environment); subject should additionally have avoided close contact with severely immunocompromised individuals for at least 21 days after receipt of investigational product
- Receipt of any investigational agent within 30 days prior to randomization, or expected receipt through 30 days after the dose of investigational product (use of licensed agents for indications not listed in the package insert was permitted)
- Expected receipt of anti-pyretic or analgesic medication on a daily or every other day basis from randomization through 14 days after receipt of investigational product
- Administration of intranasal medications within 14 days prior to randomization, or expected receipt through 14 days after administration of investigational product
- Known or suspected mitochondrial encephalomyopathy
- Nursing mother
- Any condition (eg, chronic cough, allergic rhinitis) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have interfered with evaluation of the investigational product or interpretation of subject safety or study results
- Employees of the clinical study site or any other individuals involved with the conduct of the study, or immediate family members of such individuals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MedImmune LLClead
Study Sites (3)
Covance CRU, Inc.
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117, United States
Covance CRU, Inc
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Covance CRU, Inc
Austin, Texas, 78757, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Elissa Malkin, DO
- Organization
- MedImmune, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Elissa Malkin, D.O.
MedImmune LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2009
First Posted
April 2, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 14, 2011
Results First Posted
July 13, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-07