NCT00873912

Brief Summary

This prospective annual release study was designed to assess the safety of a monovalent influenza virus vaccine using a new strain recommended for the 2009-2010 influenza season not previously contained in the trivalent intranasal FluMist vaccine. Three hundred healthy adults received a single dose of vaccine or placebo and were followed for 180 days.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4 healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2009

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2009

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 13, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

July 14, 2011

Status Verified

July 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

April 1, 2009

Results QC Date

October 8, 2010

Last Update Submit

July 12, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

influenzaFluMist

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants Reporting Fever, Defined as Oral Temperature ≥ 101°F

    The percentage of subjects with fever was compared between the two treatment groups based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% exact confidence interval (CI) for the rate difference (monovalent vaccine minus placebo). The upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI was evaluated against the pre-specified equivalence criterion of 5 percentage points which corresponded to the following hypotheses: - H0 (null): rate difference ≥ 5 percentage points, - HA (alternative): rate difference \< 5 percentage points.

    Days 1-8 after vaccination

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom or at Least One Adverse Event (AE)

    Days 1-8 after vaccination

  • Number of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom or at Least One AE

    Days 1-15 after vaccination

  • Number of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD)

    Days 1-29 after vaccination

  • Number of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD)

    Days 1-181 after vaccination

Study Arms (2)

Monovalent influenza virus vaccine

EXPERIMENTAL

Frozen monovalent vaccine containing new strain

Biological: Monovalent influenza virus vaccine

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo

Biological: Placebo

Interventions

Monovalent vaccine was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing a total volume of 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer, egg allantoic fluid, and approximately 10\^7 FFU (fluorescent focus units) of the cold-adapted, attenuated, 6:2 reassortant influenza strain B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Victoria lineage).

Monovalent influenza virus vaccine
PlaceboBIOLOGICAL

Placebo was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 49 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female, 18 to 49 years of age (not yet reached their 50th birthday) at the time of investigational product administration
  • Healthy by medical history and physical exam
  • Written informed consent and any locally required authorization (eg, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act \[HIPAA\] in the United States of America \[USA\], European Union \[EU\] Data Privacy Directive in the EU) obtained from the subject/legal representative prior to performing any protocol-related procedures, including screening evaluations
  • Females of childbearing potential, unless surgically sterile (ie, bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or complete hysterectomy), had sterile male partner, were premenarchal or at least 2 years postmenopausal, or practiced abstinence, must have used 2 effective methods of avoiding pregnancy (including oral, transdermal, or implanted contraceptives, intrauterine device, female condom with spermicide, diaphragm with spermicide, cervical cap, or use of a condom with spermicide by the sexual partner) for at least 30 days prior to dosing with investigational product, and must have agreed to continue using such precautions for at least 90 days after dosing with investigational product; cessation of birth control after this point was to be discussed with a responsible physician. The subject must also have had a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 14 days prior to investigational product administration (if screening and administration of investigational product did not occur on the same day) and on the day of investigational product administration prior to randomization
  • Males, unless surgically sterile, must have used 2 effective methods of birth control with a female partner and must have agreed to continue using such contraceptive precautions for at least 30 days after dosing with investigational product (from Day 1 through Day 31 of the study)
  • Subject available by telephone
  • Ability to understand and comply with the requirements of the protocol, as judged by the investigator
  • Ability to complete follow-up period of 180 days after dosing as required by the protocol

You may not qualify if:

  • History of hypersensitivity to any component of the vaccine, including egg or egg protein or serious, life-threatening, or severe reactions to previous influenza vaccinations
  • History of hypersensitivity to gentamicin
  • Any condition for which the inactivated influenza vaccine was indicated, including chronic disorders of the pulmonary or cardiovascular systems (eg, asthma), chronic metabolic diseases (eg, diabetes mellitus), renal dysfunction, or hemoglobinopathies that required regular medical follow-up or hospitalization during the preceding year
  • Acute febrile (\> 100.0°F oral or equivalent) and/or clinically significant respiratory illness (eg, cough or sore throat) within 14 days prior to randomization
  • Any known immunosuppressive condition or immune deficiency disease, including human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\] infection, or ongoing immunosuppressive therapy
  • History of Guillain-Barré syndrome
  • A household contact who was severely immunocompromised (eg, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient, during those periods in which the immunocompromised individual required care in a protective environment); subject should additionally have avoided close contact with severely immunocompromised individuals for at least 21 days after receipt of investigational product
  • Receipt of any investigational agent within 30 days prior to randomization, or expected receipt through 30 days after the dose of investigational product (use of licensed agents for indications not listed in the package insert was permitted)
  • Expected receipt of anti-pyretic or analgesic medication on a daily or every other day basis from randomization through 14 days after receipt of investigational product
  • Administration of intranasal medications within 14 days prior to randomization, or expected receipt through 14 days after administration of investigational product
  • Known or suspected mitochondrial encephalomyopathy
  • Nursing mother
  • Any condition (eg, chronic cough, allergic rhinitis) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have interfered with evaluation of the investigational product or interpretation of subject safety or study results
  • Employees of the clinical study site or any other individuals involved with the conduct of the study, or immediate family members of such individuals

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Covance CRU, Inc.

Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117, United States

Location

Covance CRU, Inc

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

Covance CRU, Inc

Austin, Texas, 78757, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Influenza, Human

Interventions

Influenza Vaccines

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Viral VaccinesVaccinesBiological ProductsComplex Mixtures

Results Point of Contact

Title
Elissa Malkin, DO
Organization
MedImmune, LLC

Study Officials

  • Elissa Malkin, D.O.

    MedImmune LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2009

First Posted

April 2, 2009

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion

May 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2009

Last Updated

July 14, 2011

Results First Posted

July 13, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-07

Locations