Impact Study of 2 Therapeutic Strategy for Aggressive Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
IQUALYSEP
Study Impact, on Clinical Outcomes, Quality of Life and Costs of 2 Therapeutic Strategy (Monthly Natalizumab Versus Mitoxantrone Then Immunomodulator) at 3 Years of Follow-up for Aggressive Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Cost-effectiveness study of 2 disease-modifying therapies (natalizumab versus mitoxantrone followed by immunomodulator) in the management of aggressive remitting multiple sclerosis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable multiple-sclerosis
Started Feb 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable multiple-sclerosis
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2019
CompletedDecember 3, 2012
November 1, 2012
6 years
February 8, 2010
November 30, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
cost effectiveness
30 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
progressive neurological disability
3 years
Study Arms (2)
mitoxantrone followed by immunomodulator
EXPERIMENTALnatalizumab
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
mitoxantrone during 6 months and followed by immunomodulator during 2 years and half
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with remitting multiple sclerosis according to mac Donald criteria
- aggressive remitting multiple sclerosis according to following criteria:
- or more
- EDSS between 2 and 5
- aged less or equal to 40 years old for the women
- effective contraception
You may not qualify if:
- patients less than 18 years old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
CHU Cavale Blanche
Brest, 29609, France
CHU Rennes
Rennes, 35033, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edan Gilles, MD PhD
Rennes University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2010
First Posted
February 9, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2019
Last Updated
December 3, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11