NCT01065454

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to assess whether increasing oral doses of Riociguat are safe and improve the well-being, symptoms and outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
202

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
17 countries

80 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 8, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 14, 2010

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 6, 2012

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 25, 2013

Completed
11.6 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 23, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 28, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

February 8, 2010

Results QC Date

November 6, 2013

Last Update Submit

August 7, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Pulmonary HypertensionLeft ventricular dysfunction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pulmonary Artery Mean Pressure (PAPmean) at Rest - Change From Baseline to Week 16

    Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAPmean) is a directly measured hemodynamic parameter. PAPmean is recorded during a right heart catheterization.

    Baseline and visit 6 (16 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (25)

  • Venous Oxygen Saturation (SvO2) - Change From Baseline to Week 16

    Baseline and visit 6 (16 weeks)

  • Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) - Change From Baseline to Week 16

    Baseline and visit 6 (16 weeks)

  • Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Index (PVRi) - Change From Baseline to Week 16

    Baseline and visit 6 (16 weeks)

  • Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) - Change From Baseline to Week 16

    Baseline and visit 6 (16 weeks)

  • Systemic Vascular Resistance Index (SVRi) - Change From Baseline to Week 16

    Baseline and visit 6 (16 weeks)

  • +20 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521) up to 2 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received riociguat up to 2 mg three times per day (tid) (increasing from 0.5 to 1 to 2 mg).

Drug: Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)

Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521) up to 1 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received riociguat up to 1 mg tid (increasing from 0.5 to 1 mg).

Drug: Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)

Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521) fixed 0.5 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received riociguat 0.5 mg tid (fixed dose).

Drug: Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants received placebo tid.

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

up to 2 mg three times a day (increasing from 0.5 to 1 to 2 mg)

Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521) up to 2 mg

Placebo three times a day

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female patients with symptomatic pulmonary hypertension due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction despite optimized heart failure therapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Types of pulmonary hypertension other than group 2.1 of Dana Point Classification

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (83)

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, 90073-1003, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, 92103, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Torrance, California, 90502, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Westminster, California, 92683, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, 33136, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114-2696, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fairfield, Ohio, 45014, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Falls Church, Virginia, 22042, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sydney, New South Wales, 2010, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020, Austria

Location

Unknown Facility

Vienna, 1090, Austria

Location

Unknown Facility

Aalst, 9300, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Brussels, 1070, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Ghent, 9000, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Leuven, 3000, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Québec, G1V 4G5, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Beijing, 100020, China

Location

Unknown Facility

Shanghai, 200032, China

Location

Unknown Facility

Shanghai, 200433, China

Location

Unknown Facility

Brno, 656 91, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Olomouc, 77900, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Prague, 12808, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Prague, 140 21, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Bron, 69677, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Lille, 59037, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Nantes, 44035, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Pessac, 33604, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Rouen, 76031, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Toulouse, 31059, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69115, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Augsburg, Bavaria, 86156, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 17475, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Erfurt, Thuringia, 99089, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Naples, Campania, 80131, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Pavia, Lombardy, 27100, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 466-8560, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Seto, Aichi-ken, 489-8642, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Ōgaki, Gifu, 503-8502, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Higashiibaraki, Ibaraki, 311-3193, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Tsu, Mie-ken, 514-1101, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kita-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 530-8480, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Osaka, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kusatsu, Shiga, 525-8585, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sunto, Shizuoka, 411-8611, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, 116-8567, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Tanabe, Wakayama, 646-8558, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Amsterdam, 1091 AC, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Nijmegen, 6525 GA, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Bydgoszcz, 85-168, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Gdansk, 80-214, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, 04-628, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Singapore, 119074, Singapore

Location

Unknown Facility

Singapore, 169609, Singapore

Location

Unknown Facility

Singapore, 308433, Singapore

Location

Unknown Facility

A Coruña, A Coruña, 15006, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Palma, Palma de Mallorca, 7198, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Barcelona, 08003, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, 28041, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Murcia, 30120, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Valencia, 46026, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1205, Switzerland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lugano, Canton Ticino, 6900, Switzerland

Location

Unknown Facility

Zurich, 8091, Switzerland

Location

Unknown Facility

Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0AY, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Ghio S, Bonderman D, Felix SB, Ghofrani HA, Michelakis ED, Mitrovic V, Oudiz RJ, Frey R, Roessig L, Semigran MJ. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction associated with pulmonary hypertension riociguat trial (LEPHT): rationale and design. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Aug;14(8):946-53. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs071. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

  • Bonderman D, Ghio S, Felix SB, Ghofrani HA, Michelakis E, Mitrovic V, Oudiz RJ, Boateng F, Scalise AV, Roessig L, Semigran MJ; Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Associated With Pulmonary Hypertension Riociguat Trial (LEPHT) Study Group. Riociguat for patients with pulmonary hypertension caused by systolic left ventricular dysfunction: a phase IIb double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging hemodynamic study. Circulation. 2013 Jul 30;128(5):502-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001458. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypertension, PulmonaryVentricular Dysfunction, Left

Interventions

riociguat

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesHypertensionVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular DysfunctionHeart Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Subjects had advanced disease and were heavily pretreated. Baseline values were not comparable between treatment groups.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Therapeutic Area Head
Organization
Bayer

Study Officials

  • Bayer Study Director

    Bayer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2010

First Posted

February 9, 2010

Study Start

April 14, 2010

Primary Completion

June 6, 2012

Study Completion

July 23, 2025

Last Updated

August 28, 2025

Results First Posted

December 25, 2013

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Availability of this study's data will later be determined according to Bayer's commitment to the EFPIA/PhRMA "Principles for responsible clinical trial data sharing". This pertains to scope, timepoint and process of data access. As such, Bayer commits to sharing upon request from qualified researchers patient-level clinical trial data, study-level clinical trial data, and protocols from clinical trials in patients for medicines and indications approved in the US and EU as necessary for conducting legitimate research. This applies to data on new medicines and indications that have been approved by the EU and US regulatory agencies on or after January 01, 2014. Interested researchers can use www.vivli.org to request access to anonymized patient-level data and supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct research. Information on the Bayer criteria for listing studies and other relevant information is provided in the member section of the portal.

Locations