Efficacy Study of Olaparib With Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel in Gastric Cancer Patients
A Randomised, Double Blinded, Multicentre Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy of Olaparib (AZD2281, KU-0059436) in Combination With Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Progress Following First-line Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
7
Brief Summary
To assess the efficacy of olaparib when given in combination with paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel alone as defined by progression-free survival (PFS), in all patients with recurrent and metastatic gastric cancer who progress following first-line therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 gastric-cancer
Started Feb 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_2 gastric-cancer
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 11, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 29, 2023
CompletedJuly 20, 2023
July 1, 2023
2.3 years
February 4, 2010
January 13, 2015
July 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the Overall Study Population
PFS is defined as the time from randomisation till objective progression or death. In absence of progression or death, the time is calculated from randomisation till last evaluable scanning visit.
Tumour assessments were carried out at baseline and then follow up assessments taken every 8 weeks up to Week 40 and then every 16 weeks until objective disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Patients With Tumours Defined as Homologous Recombination Deficient by Loss of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutation (ATM) Protein [ATM Negative Patients]
PFS is defined as the time from randomisation till objective progression or death. In absence of progression or death, the time is calculated from randomisation till last evaluable scanning visit.
Tumour assessments are carried out at baseline and then follow up assessments taken every 8 weeks up to Week 40 and then every 16 weeks until objective disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Overall Survival (OS) in the Overall Study Population
Survival follow up from randomisation till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Overall Survival (OS) in ATM Negative Patients
Survival follow up from randomisation till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the Overall Study Population
Tumour assessments carried out at baseline, 28 days before randomisation then every 8 weeks until week 40, after week 40 assessments will be carried out every 16 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the ATM Negative Patients
Tumour assessments carried out at baseline, 28 days before randomisation then every 8 weeks until week 40, after week 40 assessments will be carried out every 16 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 27 months
Percentage Change in Tumour Size at Week 8 in the Overall Study Population
Tumour scans done at Baseline and week 8
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALOlaparib + paclitaxel
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORpaclitaxel + placebo
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer that has progressed following first line-therapy
- Confirmed ATM protein status by IHC archival tumour sample
- At least one lesion (measurable and/or non-measurable) that can be accurately assessed by imaging (CT/MRI) at baseline and follow up visits
You may not qualify if:
- More than one prior chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of gastric cancer in the metastatic or recurrent setting
- Any previous treatment with a PARP inhibitor, including olaparib
- Patients with second primary cancer, except; adequately treated non melanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in situ cancer of the cervix, or other solid tumours curatively treated with no evidence of disease for \>5 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (7)
Research Site
Goyang-si, 410-769, South Korea
Research Site
Jeonnam, 519-763, South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, 03722, South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, 134-791, South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, 137-701, South Korea
Research Site
Taegu, 705-035, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Chan KH, Rutazanaa D, Wray C, Thosani N, Yang V, Cen P. Promising Response of Olaparib in Patient With Germline ATM-Mutated Metastatic Gastric Cancer. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2024 Jan-Dec;12:23247096241240176. doi: 10.1177/23247096241240176.
PMID: 38504422DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anitra Fielding
- Organization
- AstraZeneca
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jane Robertson, BSc, MBCHB, MD
AstraZeneca
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yung-Jue Bang, MD
Seoul National University Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2010
First Posted
February 5, 2010
Study Start
February 2, 2010
Primary Completion
May 11, 2012
Study Completion
June 29, 2023
Last Updated
July 20, 2023
Results First Posted
April 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
- Access Criteria
- When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.