Safety and Efficacy Study of Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Chronic Burkholderia Species Infection
Phase 3b Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Two-Part Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Continuous Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) in Subjects With Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and Chronic Burkholderia Species Infection
1 other identifier
interventional
102
2 countries
35
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study was to determine if an experimental drug called Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) was safe and effective to treat Burkholderia lung infections in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function, and the revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) was used to assess quality of life. The CFQ-R is a validated, patient-reported outcome tool used to measure health-related quality of life for children and adults with CF. The study consisted of a 24-week randomized phase, and a 24-week open-label phase. Primary and secondary efficacy analyses were conducted for the 24-week randomized phase only. Safety data were collected for both the randomized and open-label phases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Feb 2010
35 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 11, 2014
CompletedMarch 11, 2014
February 1, 2014
1.6 years
January 28, 2010
March 8, 2013
February 7, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
AUCave of Relative Change in FEV1 % Predicted From Baseline to Week 24
The relative change (AUCave) in FEV1 % predicted from baseline to Week 24 was analyzed. FEV1 % predicted is defined as FEV1 % of the patient divided by the average FEV1 % in the population for any person of similar age, sex and body composition. AUCave is the calculated area under the curve corrected for baseline and adjusted by the number of days on study through Week 24.
Baseline to Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Total Number of Systemic and/or Inhaled Antibiotic Courses for Respiratory Events
Baseline to Week 24
AUCave of Change in CFQ-R RSS Scores From Baseline to Week 24
Baseline to Week 24
AUCave of Relative Change From Baseline to Week 24 in FEV1
Baseline to Week 24
AUCave of Relative Change From Baseline to Week 24 in FVC
Baseline to Week 24
AUCave of Relative Change From Baseline to Week 24 in FEF25-75
Baseline to Week 24
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
AZLI
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were randomized to receive AZLI for up to 24 weeks and may have continued to receive AZLI during the open-label phase for up to an additional 24 weeks.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants were randomized to receive placebo to match AZLI for up to 24 weeks and may have switched to AZLI during the open-label phase for up to 24 weeks.
Interventions
Aztreonam for inhalation solution (AZLI; 75 mg aztreonam/52.5 mg lysine monohydrate) was administered three times a day, with at least 4 hours between doses, using the investigational nebulizer.
Placebo to match AZLI (lactose and sodium chloride) was administered three times a day, with at least 4 hours between doses, using the investigational nebulizer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female ≥ 6 years of age
- Subjects with CF as diagnosed by one of the following:
- Documented sweat chloride ≥ 60 milliequivalent (mEq)/L by quantitative pilocarpine iontophoresis test
- Documented sweat sodium ≥ 60 mmol/L
- Two well-characterized genetic mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene
- Abnormal nasal potential difference (NPD) with accompanying symptoms characteristic of CF
- Chronic infection with Burkholderia spp. defined by:
- One sputum (or bronchoalveolar lavage) culture positive for Burkholderia spp. within 6 months prior to baseline assessment,
- At least 50% of sputum (or bronchoalveolar lavage) cultures collected at least one month apart over the previous 12 months prior to baseline assessment positive for Burkholderia spp. (minimum of 2 positive cultures), and
- At least one positive sputum (or bronchoalveolar lavage) culture (obtained at any point in time) confirmed to be Burkholderia spp. by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) Burkholderia cepacia Research Laboratory and Repository at the University of Michigan (or equivalent Canadian reference laboratory).
- Concomitant aerosolized antibiotic treatment: subjects receiving intermittent (alternating month on/month off) aerosolized antibiotic treatment were eligible, but must have been at least 1 week into their off-treatment cycle at the time of baseline assessment. Subjects receiving continuous aerosolized antibiotic treatment were eligible without restriction on their aerosolized antibiotic treatment.
- Chest radiograph, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (most recent, obtained within 90 days of screening) without significant acute findings (eg, infiltrates \[lobar or diffuse interstitial\], pleural effusion, pneumothorax), and no significant intercurrent illness; chronic, stable findings (eg, chronic scarring or atelectasis) were allowed.
- Subjects (and parent/guardian as required) must have been able to provide written informed consent/assent prior to any study-related procedures,
- Ability to perform reproducible pulmonary function tests
- Sexually active females of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective method of contraception during heterosexual intercourse throughout the study period and for 30 days following discontinuation of study drug. A highly effective method of birth control was defined as a method that would result in a low failure rate (ie, less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly, such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices (IUDs), or a vasectomized partner.
You may not qualify if:
- Administration of any investigational drug or use of any investigational device within 28 days of randomization/baseline and within six half-lives of the investigational drug (whichever is longer)
- Administration of AZLI treatment within the 28 days prior to randomization/baseline
- Known local or systemic hypersensitivity to monobactam antibiotics
- History of lung transplantation
- Abnormal renal or hepatic function results at most recent test within the previous 90 days, defined as:
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 5 times the upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
- Serum creatinine \> 2 times ULN
- Known portal hypertension or complications of CF hepatopathy
- Positive urine pregnancy test (confirmed by serum pregnancy test) at screening; all women of childbearing potential were tested
- Any female of childbearing potential who was lactating or not practicing a highly effective method of birth control as defined in the protocol
- Any serious or active medical or psychiatric illness which, in the opinion of the investigator, would have interfered with subject treatment, assessment or compliance with the protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gilead Scienceslead
Study Sites (35)
Unknown Facility
Mobile, Alabama, 36608, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, 80206, United States
Unknown Facility
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102, United States
Unknown Facility
Wilmington, Delaware, 19803, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
Unknown Facility
Glenview, Illinois, 60025, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Unknown Facility
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States
Unknown Facility
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Unknown Facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89107, United States
Unknown Facility
Morristown, New Jersey, 07962, United States
Unknown Facility
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903, United States
Unknown Facility
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
Unknown Facility
New Hyde Park, New York, 11040, United States
Unknown Facility
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Unknown Facility
Akron, Ohio, 44308, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States
Unknown Facility
Toledo, Ohio, 43606, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Unknown Facility
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15201, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbia, South Carolina, 29203, United States
Unknown Facility
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
Unknown Facility
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53201, United States
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trial Disclosures
- Organization
- Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mark Bresnik, MD
Gilead Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2010
First Posted
February 1, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 11, 2014
Results First Posted
March 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02