Influence of Ultrasonographic Hydro-dissection With Glucose 5% on Nerve Block Efficiency
Hydro-Echo
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The real-time visualization of a needle and nerve during an ultrasound-guided nerve block can be challenging. These difficulties may partly explain the systemic complications of local anesthetics under ultrasound. Injection of small amounts of a solution around the anesthetized nerve (hydro-dissection) has been proposed to enhance contrast outlining its borders and also to improve the visualization of the needle tip. The glucose solution 5% solution is interesting because it allows, unlike saline, to maintain the motor response with neurostimulation. The hydro-dissection can be particularly useful when one suspect hypoechoic vessels near the nerve to be anesthetized. Thereby, the nerve well demarcated and separated from the vessels, injection of local anesthetic is performed in the circumferential diffusion space (like a small pocket) without redirecting needle. The influence of this hydro-dissection on the nerve block efficiency is unknown. The nerve block quality can be improved because the entire anesthetic is injected in contact with the nerve, but it can also be reduced due to the dilution of the local anesthetic by the glucose solution. In this randomized study, the investigators test the hypothesis that hydro-dissection does not alter the nerve block onset time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedSeptember 23, 2016
September 1, 2016
1 year
January 27, 2010
September 22, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Onset time of sensory blockade (light touch test: total loss of sensation at the two distal phalanges of index)
30 minutes after injection
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Onset time of sensory blockade (cold test at index finger and thenar eminence)
30 minutes after injection
Onset time (light touch test at thenar eminence)
30 minutes after injection
Onset time for motor blockade
30 minutes after injection
Success rate (% of patients with total light touch block at index finger within 30 min evaluation period)
30 minutes after injection
Successful surgical anesthesia
30 minutes after injection
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORmedian nerve block (6 ml lidocaine 1.5 % with adrenalin 1:200000)
median nerve block after hydro-dissection
EXPERIMENTALmedian nerve block (6 ml lidocaine 1.5 % with adrenalin 1:200000) after hydro-dissection (glucose 5% solution)
Interventions
median nerve block performed after hydro-dissection (glucose 5% solution), both using ultrasound guidance
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients with an ASA physical status I-II scheduled for elective ambulatory surgery of the hand or wrist involving the median nerve
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus,
- History of clinical or laboratory evidence of abnormal bleeding,
- Infection at the injection site,
- Allergy to local anesthetic,
- Preexisting central or peripheral muscular or neurological disease (for example: carpal tunnel syndrome)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hopital Fochlead
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital Privé de l'Ouest Parisien
Trappes, 78190, France
Related Publications (1)
Dufour E, Donat N, Jaziri S, Kurdi O, Couturier C, Dreyfus JF, Fischler M. Ultrasound-guided perineural circumferential median nerve block with and without prior dextrose 5% hydrodissection: a prospective randomized double-blinded noninferiority trial. Anesth Analg. 2012 Sep;115(3):728-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31825fa37d. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
PMID: 22745114DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Marc Fischler
Hôpital Foch
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2010
First Posted
January 28, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
September 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09