Comparison of the Success Rate of Two Approaches for Obturator Nerve Block in TURB (Conventional Pubic Approach [Labat Technique] and Inguinal Approach)

NCT01080599 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 4-2009-0137
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 100
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the success rate of two approaches for obturator nerve block in TURB (conventional pubic approach \[Labat technique\] and inguinal approach.

Conditions

Nerve Block

Keywords

obturator nerve block in TURB

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Assessment of obturator sign during using nerve stimulator and operation

Study Arms (2)

conventional pubic approach

EXPERIMENTAL

Procedure: obturator nerve block

inguinal approach

EXPERIMENTAL

Procedure: obturator nerve block

Interventions

obturator nerve block PROCEDURE

conventional pubic approach; inguinal approach

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Scheduled to undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor during combined spinal anesthesia and obturator nerve block were included in the clinical study

You may not qualify if:

• Patients with advanced cardiac and respiratory insufficiency
• Allergy to local anesthetics
• Preexisting neurologic deficits
• Prior operation involving the hip and the inguinal region and bleeding tendency were excluded.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Yonsei University: lead

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: March 2, 2010
• First Posted: March 4, 2010
• Study Start: June 1, 2009
• Primary Completion: January 1, 2010
• Study Completion: February 1, 2010
• Last Updated: March 4, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-03