NCT00956709

Brief Summary

Ropivacaine 0.5% and 0.5% in levobupivacaïne are used in regional anesthesia for major surgery of the foot. The literature does not highlight a significant difference in terms of onset of action between these two molecules to block the sciatic nerve \[4\]. Our hypothesis is that this lack of difference is due to the use of a neurostimulator for locating the injection site (indiscriminate nature of the anatomical approach to the sciatic nerve). Indeed, the sensitivity of neurostimulation is low compared with ultrasound \[58\] and ultrasound, for accurate visualization of the deposit of the local anesthetic around the nerve to improve the quality of the block and reduce the onset of action of local anesthetic \[46, 47\]. The investigators propose to make a comparative trial between levobupivacaïne 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% under the control of the ultrasound as part of a sciatic nerve block. The use of ultrasound will reduce the variability of results because the changes would be linked exclusively to the local anesthetic. The investigators test the hypothesis that levobupivacaïne gives better results in terms of onset of action than ropivacaine.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2008

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2008

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 10, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 11, 2009

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2011

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

October 5, 2016

Status Verified

October 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

August 10, 2009

Results QC Date

July 7, 2014

Last Update Submit

October 3, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare the Onset of Action of Ropivacaine 0.5% and levobupivacaïne 0.5 % for Sciatic Nerve Block Guided in Major Surgery of the Foot

    72 hours

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Evaluate the Relative Position of the Tibial and Contigent Fibulaire Common in the Sciatic Nerve.

    72 hours

  • Duration of Motor Sciatic Block (h)

    72 hours

  • Duration of Sensory Sciatic Block (h)

    72 hours

Study Arms (2)

Levobupivacaïne 0,5 %

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: levobupivacaïne 0,5 %

Ropivacaïne 0,5%

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: ropivacaïne 0,5 %

Interventions

20mL de levobupivacaïne 0,5 % 20mL de ropivacaïne 0,5 %

Levobupivacaïne 0,5 %

20mL de ropivacaïne 0,5 %

Ropivacaïne 0,5%

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with unilateral major surgery of the foot: hallux valgus (not ambulatory), claw toes, fusion-Astragalo calcaneum, complex syntheses of tarsus-aged over 18 years .
  • Male and female
  • ASA 1 or 2
  • Insured Social
  • Informed Consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Diabetes
  • Intoxication-alcoholic chronic
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Hemostasis disorders
  • Hepatic failure
  • Chronic pain syndrome

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nantes University Hospital

Nantes, 44093, France

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Pham Dang
Organization
CHU de Nantes

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2009

First Posted

August 11, 2009

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion

November 1, 2011

Study Completion

November 1, 2011

Last Updated

October 5, 2016

Results First Posted

August 1, 2014

Record last verified: 2016-10

Locations