NCT01033201

Brief Summary

Lung transplantation is indicated when end-stage lung diseases no longer respond to available standard therapy, making life expectancy short and associated with disability. Acute and chronic rejection are common complications following transplantation, indicating screening bronchoscopies and transbronchial biopsies at three month intervals the first two years, in addition to clinically indicated procedures when rejection or infection is suspected. Transbronchial biopsies carry associated risks (bleeding, pneumothorax). Chronic rejection is characterized by progressive obliteration of distal airways (Bronchiolitis Obliterans-BO-). BO requires open lung biopsy for diagnosis. Alternatively, a clinical surrogate (Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome), characterized by decline in Forced Expired Volume in 1 second not explained by acute rejection or infection is used for diagnosis. The new technique of confocal endo-microscopy enables sub-surface visualization of tissue in vivo during bronchoscopic procedures using a probe-based confocal microscope, integrated to a standard endoscope. Bronchiolar and alveolar structures can be visualized at a cellular and nuclear level, and these images can be saved and reviewed. This new technology could potentially identify acute and chronic rejection, thus offering and alternative to transbronchial biopsies. We expect to describe a new alternative to diagnose acute and chronic rejection using confocal microscopy images obtained endoscopically, obviating complications of transbronchial biopsies. Endoscopic confocal endomicroscopy can detect and classify common bronchiolar and alveolar pathological conditions in real time. Specifically, we hypothesize that confocal endomicroscopy images of bronchiolar and alveolar structures during standard bronchoscopy could help to recognize and classify the presence/absence of acute rejection and/or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in lung transplant recipients. This technology could also identify the histological characteristics lung diseases such as interstitial, obstructive or vascular end stage lung diseases, and thus lead to more efficient, safer and more accurate diagnosis of these lung conditions during routine bronchoscopies.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
71

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2008

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2008

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2009

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

January 26, 2012

Status Verified

January 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

December 15, 2009

Last Update Submit

January 25, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Lung rejection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To determine in an unblinded study, the key image features of acute lung rejection and chronic lung rejection (BOS), and estimate which morphologic features best distinguish these conditions.

    One year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • To determine the initial sensitivity and specificity of confocal imaging for the classification of acute lung rejection among lung transplant recipients.

    One year

  • To develop a library of confocal images with the most optimal confocal imaging characteristics of other lung pathologies requiring lung transplantation.

    One year

  • To determine the inter-examiner differences and learning curve for accurate detection of acute rejection as well as the confocal images of other lung pathologies.

    One year

  • To determine in a unblinded pilot study, the key image features of chronic lung rejection as defined by the Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS), and estimate which morphologic features best distinguish this conditions.

    One year

Study Arms (1)

Lung transplant

All lung transplant patients presenting for screening/surveillance and diagnostic bronchoscopies at Mayo Clinic Florida are eligible for participation.

Other: Confocal imaging

Interventions

At the time of the standard of care bronchoscopy, confocal images will be obtained from each consented patient.

Also known as: AlveoloFlex Confocal Miniprobes, Cellvizio-Lung system
Lung transplant

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients scheduled to undergo bronchoscopy either before or after lung transplantation.

You may qualify if:

  • Age above 18 years
  • Any patient undergoing surveillance or clinically indicated bronchoscopies during or after lung transplantation
  • Any patient undergoing bronchoscopy prior lung transplant

You may not qualify if:

  • Unwilling to consent
  • Unable to safely tolerate a bronchoscopic procedure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • St Croix CM, Leelavanichkul K, Watkins SC. Intravital fluorescence microscopy in pulmonary research. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006 Sep 15;58(7):834-40. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.07.007. Epub 2006 Aug 11.

    PMID: 16996641BACKGROUND
  • Herth FJ, Eberhardt R, Ernst A. The future of bronchoscopy in diagnosing, staging and treatment of lung cancer. Respiration. 2006;73(4):399-409. doi: 10.1159/000093369.

    PMID: 16775411BACKGROUND
  • Trulock EP, Christie JD, Edwards LB, Boucek MM, Aurora P, Taylor DO, Dobbels F, Rahmel AO, Keck BM, Hertz MI. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-fourth official adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report-2007. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Aug;26(8):782-95. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.06.003. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17692782BACKGROUND
  • Moffatt SD, Demers P, Robbins RC, Doyle R, Wienacker A, Henig N, Theodore J, Reitz BA, Whyte RI. Lung transplantation: a decade of experience. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Feb;24(2):145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.10.020.

    PMID: 15701428BACKGROUND
  • Sibley RK, Berry GJ, Tazelaar HD, Kraemer MR, Theodore J, Marshall SE, Billingham ME, Starnes VA. The role of transbronchial biopsies in the management of lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Mar-Apr;12(2):308-24.

    PMID: 8476904BACKGROUND
  • Bowdish ME, Arcasoy SM, Wilt JS, Conte JV, Davis RD, Garrity ER, Hertz ML, Orens JB, Rosengard BR, Barr ML. Surrogate markers and risk factors for chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Am J Transplant. 2004 Jul;4(7):1171-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00483.x.

    PMID: 15196078BACKGROUND
  • Colombat M, Groussard O, Lautrette A, Thabut G, Marrash-Chahla R, Brugiere O, Mal H, Leseche G, Fournier M, Degott C. Analysis of the different histologic lesions observed in transbronchial biopsy for the diagnosis of acute rejection. Clinicopathologic correlations during the first 6 months after lung transplantation. Hum Pathol. 2005 Apr;36(4):387-94. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.01.022.

    PMID: 15892000BACKGROUND
  • Khalifah AP, Hachem RR, Chakinala MM, Yusen RD, Aloush A, Patterson GA, Mohanakumar T, Trulock EP, Walter MJ. Minimal acute rejection after lung transplantation: a risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Am J Transplant. 2005 Aug;5(8):2022-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00953.x.

    PMID: 15996255BACKGROUND
  • Hachem RR, Yusen RD, Chakinala MM, Meyers BF, Lynch JP, Aloush AA, Patterson GA, Trulock EP. A randomized controlled trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Oct;26(10):1012-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.07.027.

    PMID: 17919621BACKGROUND
  • Tazelaar HD, Nilsson FN, Rinaldi M, Murtaugh P, McDougall JC, McGregor CG. The sensitivity of transbronchial biopsy for the diagnosis of acute lung rejection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993 Apr;105(4):674-8.

    PMID: 8469001BACKGROUND
  • Yousem SA, Berry GJ, Cagle PT, Chamberlain D, Husain AN, Hruban RH, Marchevsky A, Ohori NP, Ritter J, Stewart S, Tazelaar HD. Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996 Jan;15(1 Pt 1):1-15.

    PMID: 8820078BACKGROUND
  • Estenne M, Maurer JR, Boehler A, Egan JJ, Frost A, Hertz M, Mallory GB, Snell GI, Yousem S. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome 2001: an update of the diagnostic criteria. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002 Mar;21(3):297-310. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(02)00398-4. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11897517BACKGROUND
  • Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M, Gnaendiger J, Enders M, Delaney P, Polglase A, McLaren W, Janell D, Thomas S, Nafe B, Galle PR, Neurath MF. Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology. 2004 Sep;127(3):706-13. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.06.050.

    PMID: 15362025BACKGROUND
  • Thiberville L, Moreno-Swirc S, Vercauteren T, Peltier E, Cave C, Bourg Heckly G. In vivo imaging of the bronchial wall microstructure using fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan 1;175(1):22-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200605-684OC. Epub 2006 Oct 5.

    PMID: 17023733BACKGROUND
  • Pacurariu RI. Low incidence of side effects following intravenous fluorescein angiography. Ann Ophthalmol. 1982 Jan;14(1):32-6.

    PMID: 7125438BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2009

First Posted

December 16, 2009

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion

March 1, 2011

Study Completion

March 1, 2011

Last Updated

January 26, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-01

Locations