XLIF® vs. MAS®TLIF for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With or Without Central Stenosis.
A Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Evaluation of the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of XLIF® Compared With MAS® TLIF for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With or Without Central Stenosis
1 other identifier
observational
55
1 country
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine differences in the XLIF and TLIF procedures with respect to perioperative variables in adult patients with low-grade symptomatic spondylolisthesis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Nov 2009
Longer than P75 for all trials
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 24, 2025
December 1, 2025
5.3 years
December 1, 2009
December 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The average improvement in clinical function (ODI) at 24 months compared with baseline, for each procedure.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The average improvement in pain (VAS) at 24 months compared with baseline, for each procedure.
24 months
Study Arms (2)
XLIF
This group will have the XLIF procedure done.
MAS TLIF
This group will have the MAS TLIF procedure done.
Eligibility Criteria
Study population will consist of patients from participating site locations.
You may qualify if:
- \- Male and female patients who are at least 18 years of age;
- \- Patients who present with symptomatic Grade I or II degenerative spondylolisthesis at 1 or 2 contiguous lumbar levels between L1 and L5 and are surgical candidates for interbody lumbar fusion surgery; symptoms should include radiculopathy and/or neurogenic claudication with or without back pain;
- \- Patients who have been unresponsive to at least 6 months of conservative treatments or exhibit progressive neurological symptoms in the face of conservative treatment;
- \- Patients who understand the conditions of enrollment and are willing to sign an informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Patients with lumbar pathologies requiring treatment at more than 2 levels;
- \- Patients who have had previous lumbar fusion surgery;
- \- Patients with lytic spondylolisthesis or a defect of the pars interarticularis;
- \- Patients with radiographic confirmation of Grade IV facet joint disease or degeneration;
- \- Patients with non-contained or extruded herniated nucleus pulposus
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NuVasivelead
Study Sites (9)
St. Vincent-Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32204, United States
Celebration Florida Hospital
Kissimmee, Florida, 34747, United States
St. Joseph's/Candler Health System
Savannah, Georgia, 31405, United States
Northwest Orthopaedic Specialists, P.S.
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003, United States
Orthopaedic Clinic-Riverside Campus, University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55454, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
The Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Spine and Sports Institute
Richland, Washington, 99352, United States
Northwest Orthopaedic Specialists, P.S.
Spokane, Washington, 99208, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2009
First Posted
December 3, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12