Study Stopped
scarce interest of centres
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Large Rectal Adenomas
TEMENDO
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: Recent non-randomized studies suggest that extended endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is equally effective in removing large rectal adenomas as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). If equally effective, ESD might be a more cost-effective approach as this strategy does not require expensive equipment, general anesthesia and hospital admission. Furthermore, ESD appears to be associated with fewer complications. In a randomized trial we will compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of TEM and ESD for the resection of large rectal adenomas. Study design: 15 centers will participate in this multicenter randomized trial comparing TEM versus ESD. Study population: Patients with a large rectal adenoma (≥2cm), located between 2 and 15 cm from the anal verge. Invasive cancer is excluded by histopathology and endoscopic ultrasonography. Patients must be in a health condition that permits general anesthesia. Interventions: Patients will be randomized between a. TEM: under general anesthesia b. ESD under sedation
- 1.a TEM tube will be inserted in the rectum. With specialized instruments the adenoma will be dissected en bloc by a full thickness excision, after which the patient will be admitted to the hospital.
- 2.an endoscope will be inserted into the rectum and the submucosa underneath the lesion will be injected with saline to lift the adenoma. With an endoscopic knife (Insulated Tip Knife, Olympus or Water Jet, Erbe) the lesion will be resected through the submucosal plane in an eb-bloc fashion, after which the patient will be observed for at least 24h in-hospital.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedSeptember 8, 2023
September 1, 2023
7.9 years
December 1, 2009
September 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of recurrence at 12 months
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Morbidity, subdivided into major (requiring surgery) and minor (requiring endoscopic or medical intervention)
24 months
Anorectal function
12 months
Disease specific and general quality of life
12 months
Number of days not spent in hospital from initial treatment until 2 years afterwards
12 months
Study Arms (2)
TEM - Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORTEM under general anesthesia
ESD - Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
ACTIVE COMPARATORESD under sedation
Interventions
TEM tube will be inserted in the rectum. With specialized instruments the adenoma will be dissected en bloc by a full thickness excision, after which the patient will be admitted to the hospital.
an endoscope will be inserted into the rectum and the submucosa underneath the lesion will be injected with saline to lift the adenoma. With an endoscopic knife (Insulated Tip Knife, Olympus or Water Jet, Erbe) the lesion will be resected through the submucosal plane in an eb-bloc fashion, after which the patient will be observed for at least 24h in-hospital.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with a large non-pedunculated rectal adenoma (sessile or flat) with a largest diameter of ≥2 cm (estimated by an opened resection snare of 20 or 30 mm).
- The lower and upper borders of the adenoma are located at ≥2 cm and ≤15 cm from the anal verge, respectively.
- During flexible video endoscopy there are no signs of endoscopic suspicion for submucosal invasive cancer (Kudo pit pattern type V; excavated/depressed type morphology; fold convergence; or large smooth nodule \>1 cm in a flat lesion) (33). In case of doubt, patients will undergo EUS as described at (2).
- In case doubt remains after flexible video endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) of the rectal adenoma should exclude invasion into the submucosal layer and exclude pathological lymphadenopathy (lymph nodes \>1 cm). When pathological lymph nodes are present, fine needle aspiration will be performed to exclude lymph node metastasis (N+ disease).
- If not performed already, total colonoscopy will be done to detect and remove all synchronous colonic adenomas or cancers first. Cecal intubation must be confirmed by identification of the appendiceal orifice and ileocecal valve.
- The general health condition of the patient permits general anesthesia (ASA- classification I-III).
- Absence of non-correctable coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \>1,5, or platelet count \<90 × 109/l).
- Patient age of 18 years or older.
You may not qualify if:
- Preoperative histologically detected malignancy
- Previous anorectal surgery
- Contraindications to general anaesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Torino
Torino, TO, 10126, Italy
Related Publications (3)
Repici A, Conio M, De Angelis C, Sapino A, Malesci A, Arezzo A, Hervoso C, Pellicano R, Comunale S, Rizzetto M. Insulated-tip knife endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps unsuitable for standard polypectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1617-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01198.x. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
PMID: 17403075BACKGROUNDBretagnol F, Merrie A, George B, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ. Local excision of rectal tumours by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg. 2007 May;94(5):627-33. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5678.
PMID: 17335125BACKGROUNDBach SP, Hill J, Monson JR, Simson JN, Lane L, Merrie A, Warren B, Mortensen NJ; Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) Collaboration. A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009 Mar;96(3):280-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6456.
PMID: 19224520BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mario Morino, Prof of Surgery
University of Torino
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2009
First Posted
December 2, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
September 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09