Evaluation of Objective Perimetry Using Pupillometer
Objective Perimetry in Normal Subjects,Glaucoma Patients and Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients .
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective perimetry can better monitor visual field defects in RP and Glaucoma patients than conventional subjective perimetry.The PLR ( Pupil Light Reflex ) of the short and long wave ratio should be significantly higher in areas of visual field defects in RP and Glaucoma patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Nov 2009
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedNovember 19, 2014
November 1, 2014
3.2 years
November 29, 2009
November 18, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
PLR response amplitude and latency
Not defined yet
Study Arms (2)
Glaucoma
Glaucoma Patients with visual field defects
Retinitis Pigmentosa
Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients with visual field defects
Eligibility Criteria
primary care clinic
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-75
- Sign on informed consent
- Papillary response to light.
- Groups of : Normal , Glaucoma patients with early glaucoma damage on HVF (nasal step ect. ), Glaucoma patients with advanced glaucoma damage on HVF (arcuate , tubular vision ) and RP patients (Early VF damage , ring scotoma ) .
- Refractive correction up to -3.5 D.
You may not qualify if:
- Cloudy corneas.
- Surgical intraocular ophthalmic procedure within the past 30 days.
- Nonreactive pupils.
- Synechia of the iris to the lens after surgery or inflammation .
- Neovascularization.
- Iris coloboma.
- Sphincter damage due to ischemia or trauma (tears of sphincter or diffuse damage to muscle).
- Sphincter damage due to high intraocular pressure .
- Iris tumor or cyst .
- Ectropion uvea .
- Adie's pupil .
- Optic neuropathy with the potential for producing a positive RAPD (Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect ).
- Chronic use of myotics or mydriatics.
- Systemic Medication which affect on papillary response .
- Any condition preventing accurate measurement or examination of the pupils.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sheba Medical Center
Tel Litwinsky, Israel, 52621, Israel
Related Publications (5)
Yoshitomi T, Matsui T, Tanakadate A, Ishikawa S. Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients. J Neuroophthalmol. 1999 Jun;19(2):89-99.
PMID: 10380129BACKGROUNDKalaboukhova L, Fridhammar V, Lindblom B. Relative afferent pupillary defect in glaucoma: a pupillometric study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Aug;85(5):519-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00863.x. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
PMID: 17573859BACKGROUNDKardon RH. Pupil perimetry. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1992 Oct;3(5):565-70. doi: 10.1097/00055735-199210000-00002.
PMID: 10147922BACKGROUNDKardon RH, Kirkali PA, Thompson HS. Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects. Ophthalmology. 1991 Apr;98(4):485-95; discussion 495-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32267-x.
PMID: 2052302BACKGROUNDSkaat A, Sher I, Kolker A, Elyasiv S, Rosenfeld E, Mhajna M, Melamed S, Belkin M, Rotenstreich Y. Pupillometer-based objective chromatic perimetry in normal eyes and patients with retinal photoreceptor dystrophies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Apr 17;54(4):2761-70. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11127.
PMID: 23482470DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ygal Rotenstreich, MD
Sheba Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Electrophysiology Clinic, Goldschleger Eye Institute
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2009
First Posted
December 1, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 19, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11