NCT00769626

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and costs associated with two different management strategies for patients with acute low back pain who consult their primary care physician. The investigators hypothesize that management using a brief, standardized physical therapy intervention will result in better outcomes than management based on current practice guideline recommendations of watchful waiting for the first 4 weeks following consultation.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2008

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 8, 2008

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 9, 2008

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2009

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

July 18, 2011

Status Verified

October 1, 2008

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

October 8, 2008

Last Update Submit

July 15, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

Low Back PainClinical Practice GuidelinesSpinal ManipulationPhysical Therapy Techniques

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Oswestry Disability Questionnaire Patient Global Rating of Improvement

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire European Quality of Life (EuroQOL) Direct medical costs

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Early Treatment

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Early Treatment

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Usual Care

Interventions

Patients in the usual care group will receive advice and education to remain active and anticipate a favorable prognosis. Patients will also receive medication from the primary care provider consistent with current evidence-based guidelines(acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatories). Consistent with current practice guidelines, patients will be instructed to return to the primary care provider if they are not satisfied with their progress after 4 weeks.

Usual Care

Patients in the early treatment group will receive the usual care intervention (advice and education, and medication consistent with current evidence-based guidelines). Patients will also be referred to physical therapy for 4 sessions over a 3-week period. A standardized protocol will be used in physical therapy including spinal manipulation and trunk strengthening exercises. Patients will be instructed to return to the primary care provider if they are not satisfied with their progress after completion of the 4 sessions.

Early Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Symptoms of pain and/or numbness between the 12th rib and buttocks with or without symptoms into one or both legs, which, in the opinion of the primary care provider, originate from the lumbar region.
  • Age 18 - 60 years
  • Oswestry disability score \> 20%
  • Both of the clinical decision rule criteria: Duration of current symptoms \< 16 days, and patient report of no symptoms (pain, numbness, etc.) distal to the knee since onset.

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior surgery to the lumbosacral spine
  • Current pregnancy
  • Neurogenic LBP defined as the presence of either: a positive straight leg raise test (symptom reproduction at \<450) or reflex, sensory, or strength consistent with lumbar nerve root compression
  • Judgment of the primary care provider of "red flags" of a potentially serious condition including cauda equina syndrome, major or rapidly progressing neurological deficit, fracture, cancer, or infection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Intermountain Healthcare, South Jordan Health Center

South Jordan, Utah, 84095, United States

Location

Intermountain Healthcare Taylorsville Health Center

Taylorsville, Utah, 84118, United States

Location

Intermountain Healthcare West Jordan Health Center

West Jordan, Utah, 84088, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Back PainLow Back Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Julie M Fritz, PhD,PT,ATC

    Intermountain Healthcare, The University of Utah

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Gerard P Brennan, PhD, PT

    Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2008

First Posted

October 9, 2008

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion

September 1, 2009

Study Completion

May 1, 2010

Last Updated

July 18, 2011

Record last verified: 2008-10

Locations